hire
Interactive hiring wizard to set up a new AI team member. Guides the user through role design via conversation, generates agent identity files, and optionally sets up performance reviews. Use when the user wants to hire, add, or set up a new AI agent, team member, or assistant. Triggers on phrases like "hire", "add an agent", "I need help with X" (implying a new role), or "/hire".
What this skill does
# hire
Set up a new AI team member through a guided conversation. Not a config generator - a hiring process.
## When to Use
User says something like:
- "I want to hire a new agent"
- "I need help with X" (where X implies a new agent role)
- "Let's add someone to the team"
- `/hire`
## The Interview
### 3 core questions, asked one at a time:
**Q1: "What do you need help with?"**
Let them describe the problem, not a job title. "I'm drowning in code reviews" beats "I need a code reviewer."
- Listen for: scope, implied autonomy level, implied tools needed
**Q2: "What's their personality? Formal, casual, blunt, cautious, creative?"**
Or frame it as: "If this were a human colleague, what would they be like?"
- Listen for: communication style, vibe, how they interact
**Q3: "What should they never do?"**
The red lines. This is where trust gets defined.
- Listen for: boundaries, safety constraints, access limits
### Q4: Dynamic (optional)
After Q1-Q3, assess whether anything is ambiguous or needs clarification. If so, ask ONE follow-up question tailored to what's unclear. Examples:
- "You mentioned monitoring - should they alert you immediately or batch updates?"
- "They'll need access to your codebase - any repos that are off-limits?"
- "You said 'casual' - are we talking friendly-professional or meme-level casual?"
If Q1-Q3 were clear enough, skip Q4 entirely.
## Summary Card
After the interview, present a summary:
```
๐ฏ Role: [one-line description]
๐ง Name: [suggested name from naming taxonomy]
๐ค Model: [selected model] ([tier])
โก Personality: [2-3 word vibe]
๐ง Tools: [inferred from conversation]
๐ซ Boundaries: [key red lines]
๐ค Autonomy: [inferred level: high/medium/low]
```
Then ask: **"Want to tweak anything, or are we good?"**
## Model Selection
Before finalizing, select an appropriate model for the agent.
### Step 1: Discover available models
Run `openclaw models list` or check the gateway config to see what's configured.
### Step 2: Categorize by tier
Map discovered models to capability tiers:
| Tier | Models (examples) | Best for |
|------|-------------------|----------|
| **reasoning** | claude-opus-*, gpt-5*, gpt-4o, deepseek-r1 | Strategy, advisory, complex analysis, architecture |
| **balanced** | claude-sonnet-*, gpt-4-turbo, gpt-4o-mini | Research, writing, general tasks |
| **fast** | claude-haiku-*, gpt-3.5*, local/ollama | High volume, simple tasks, drafts |
| **code** | codex-*, claude-sonnet-*, deepseek-coder | Coding, refactoring, tests |
Use pattern matching on model names - don't hardcode specific versions.
### Step 3: Match role to tier
Based on the interview:
- Heavy reasoning/advisory/strategy โ reasoning tier
- Research/writing/creative โ balanced tier
- Code-focused โ code tier (or balanced if not available)
- High-volume/monitoring โ fast tier
### Step 4: Select and confirm
Pick the best available model for the role. In the summary card, add:
```
๐ค Model: [selected model] ([tier] - [brief reason])
```
If multiple good options exist or you're unsure, ask:
"For a [role type] role, I'd suggest [model] (good balance of capability and cost). Or [alternative] if you want [deeper reasoning / faster responses / lower cost]. Preference?"
### Notes
- Don't assume any specific provider - work with what's available
- Cheaper is better when capability is sufficient
- The user's default model isn't always right for every agent
- If only one model is available, use it and note it in the summary
## Optional Extras
After the summary is confirmed, offer:
1. **"Want to set up periodic performance reviews?"**
- If yes: ask preferred frequency (weekly, biweekly, monthly)
- Create a cron job that triggers a review conversation
- Review covers: what went well, what's not working, scope/permission adjustments
- At the end of each review, ask: "Want to keep this schedule, change frequency, or stop reviews?"
2. **Onboarding assignment** (if relevant to the role)
- Suggest a small first task to test the new agent
- Something real but low-stakes, so the user can see them in action
## What to Generate
Create an agent directory at `agents/<name>/` with:
### Always unique (generated fresh):
- **AGENTS.md** - Role definition, responsibilities, operational rules, what they do freely vs ask first
- **IDENTITY.md** - Name, emoji, creature type, vibe, core principles
### Start from template, customize based on interview:
- **SOUL.md** - Base from workspace SOUL.md template, customize vibe/boundaries sections
- **TOOLS.md** - Populated with inferred tools and access notes
- **HEARTBEAT.md** - Empty or with initial periodic tasks if relevant to role
### Symlink to shared (default, opinionated):
- **USER.md** โ `../../USER.md` (they need to know who they work for)
- **MEMORY.md** โ `../../MEMORY.md` (shared team context)
Mention to the user: "I've linked USER.md and MEMORY.md so they know who you are and share team context. You can change this later if you want them more isolated."
## Naming
Use craft/role-based names. Check TOOLS.md for the full naming taxonomy:
- Research: Scout, Observer, Surveyor
- Writing: Scribe, Editor, Chronicler
- Code: Smith, Artisan, Engineer
- Analysis: Analyst, Assessor, Arbiter
- Creative: Muse, Artisan
- Oversight: Auditor, Reviewer, Warden
Check existing agents to avoid name conflicts. Suggest a name that fits the role, but let the user override.
## Team Awareness
Before generating, check `agents/` for existing team members. Note:
- Potential overlaps with existing roles
- Gaps this new hire fills
- How they'll interact with existing agents
Mention any relevant observations: "You already have Scout for research - this new role would focus specifically on..."
## After Setup
1. Tell the user what was created and where
2. **Automatically update the OpenClaw config via gateway `config.patch`** (do not ask the user to run a manual command). You must:
- Add the new agent entry to `agents.list` using this format:
```json
{
"id": "<name>",
"workspace": "/home/lars/clawd/agents/<name>",
"model": "<selected-model>"
}
```
- Add the new agent ID to the **main agent's** `subagents.allowAgents` array
- Preserve all existing agents and fields (arrays replace on patch)
**Required flow:**
1) Fetch config + hash
```bash
openclaw gateway call config.get --params '{}'
```
2) Build the updated `agents.list` array (existing entries + new agent) and update the `main` agent's `subagents.allowAgents` (existing list + new id).
3) Apply with `config.patch`:
```bash
openclaw gateway call config.patch --params '{
"raw": "{\n agents: {\n list: [ /* full list with new agent + updated main allowAgents */ ]\n }\n}\n",
"baseHash": "<hash-from-config.get>",
"restartDelayMs": 1000
}'
```
3. If monthly reviews were requested, confirm the cron schedule
4. Update any team roster if one exists
## Important
- This is a CONVERSATION, not a form. Be natural.
- Infer as much as possible from context. Don't ask what you can figure out.
- The user might not know what they want exactly. Help them figure it out.
- Keep the whole process under 5 minutes for the simple case.
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context โ no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes โ information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development โ guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.