Claude
Skills
Sign in
Back

human-writing

Included with Lifetime
$97 forever

Research-backed principles for writing prose that avoids AI tells. Apply when writing articles, blog posts, emails, marketing copy, social media, or any prose content. Covers vocabulary, structure, tone, rhythm, and craft techniques that make writing feel authentically human. Not for code, commit messages, or technical documentation.

Writing & Docs

What this skill does


**User request**: $ARGUMENTS

Apply these research-backed writing principles to the current task. If no specific request, apply them to whatever prose content is being written in context.

## The Core Insight

**The fundamental problem is statistical uniformity.** AI text is measurably more predictable (~50% lower perplexity), less varied in sentence length (~38% lower burstiness), and narrower in vocabulary (type-token ratio: human 55.3 vs AI 45.5). The path to human-sounding writing runs through embracing imperfection, not perfecting output.

**The single most reliable tell is uniformity.** Human writing is messy, varied, and surprising. AI writing is smooth, consistent, and predictable.

## The 10-20-70 Rule

Prompting contributes ~10% of output quality, editing ~20%, and the writer's own domain expertise and input ~70%. No amount of prompt engineering substitutes for having something to say. Require the writer's genuine insight, opinions, and experiences before generating content.

## Hierarchy of Impact

From highest to lowest impact on making writing sound human:

| Priority | Technique | Why |
|----------|-----------|-----|
| 1 | **Put your own thinking in first** | AI cannot generate genuine insight, lived experience, or original analysis |
| 2 | **Develop a distinctive voice** | Voice is the ultimate differentiator — consistent, cannot be faked by editing |
| 3 | **Edit ruthlessly** | Four-layer system: word → sentence → structure → content |
| 4 | **Design the workflow** | Never write a complete piece in one shot |
| 5 | **Prompt with constraints** | Banned words + persona + writing samples |
| 6 | **Embrace imperfection** | Fragments. Tangents. Opinions. Rough edges make writing alive. |

## Vocabulary Kill-List

Avoid these words when *writing* — they are statistically flagged as AI-generated across peer-reviewed studies of millions of documents. (Reviewers reading existing prose should judge by density and clustering rather than single instances; see [ai-tells-and-fingerprints.md](references/ai-tells-and-fingerprints.md) and the writing-reviewer agent's frequency-aware threshold.)

**Nouns**: delve, tapestry, landscape, realm, testament, journey, insight, resilience, ecosystem, milestone, prowess, utilization

**Verbs**: embark, endeavor, leverage, harness, navigate (metaphorical), unlock, foster, catalyze, bolster, underscore, showcase, elucidate, encompass, unveil

**Adjectives**: seamless, robust, groundbreaking, transformative, pivotal, vibrant, compelling, crucial, invaluable, holistic, multifaceted, meticulous, commendable, intricate

**Adverbs**: seamlessly, meticulously, notably, profoundly, predominantly, subsequently, thereby, ultimately, moreover, furthermore

**Phrases**: "ever-evolving landscape," "in today's fast-paced world," "as we navigate the complexities," "It isn't just X, it's Y," "it's important to note," "it's worth noting that," "without further ado," "in conclusion," "at the heart of"

**Puffery / promotional drift**: "breathtaking," "stunning," "must-see," "must-visit," "iconic," "world-class," "rich cultural tapestry," "hidden gem"

**False intensifiers**: "genuinely," "truly," "actually" (when used to simulate conviction)

**Era-tracked vocabulary**: AI vocabulary shifts over time — "delve" peaked 2023–early 2024 then declined, while "align with" / "fostering" / "showcasing" rose with later models. For era-specific lists (GPT-4 era vs GPT-4o era) and the snapshot date, see [ai-tells-and-fingerprints.md § Era-tracked vocabulary](references/ai-tells-and-fingerprints.md).

## Four-Layer Editing System

Apply in order from surface to substance:

### Layer 1: Word-Level
Search-replace or delete kill-list vocabulary on sight. Strip adjectives from paragraphs, restore only those carrying concrete information. "Robust system" → "handles 10k req/s without data loss."

### Layer 2: Sentence-Level
Read only the first few words of consecutive sentences — wherever three or more follow the same pattern, cut or combine. Vary sentence length deliberately: short for punch, long for nuance. The contrast creates impact. Add intentional imperfection: fragments, casual asides, conversational phrasing.

### Layer 3: Structural
Eliminate meta-commentary ("In this section, we will..."). Kill recap conclusions that only repeat earlier points. Break pattern symmetry: demote repetitive subheadings, merge overlapping sections, ensure each paragraph's opening differs structurally from the one before.

### Layer 4: Content
Add lived experience: anecdotes, firsthand observations, specific failures. Ground in specifics — ask of every sentence: "Could this fit any topic?" If yes, it needs grounding. Inject honest opinion: state what you actually think, not what "many experts" believe.

### Final Check
**Read aloud.** Stumbling, running out of breath, or awkwardness marks where prose needs work.

## Seven Craft Fundamentals AI Structurally Cannot Produce

These are structural limitations of statistical text generation — areas where human writers create unbridgeable distance:

1. **Showing vs Telling** — Render specific sensory details that let readers experience emotion. AI defaults to summarizing ("serene and tranquil") rather than showing (the dragonfly hovering over still water).

2. **Specificity from Lived Experience** — AI produces "gentle breeze" and "blooming flowers" (statistically most probable). Replace generic descriptions with observations nobody else has made. Name the cafe, the specific dish, the particular moment.

3. **Strategic Omission** — AI tends toward completeness and closure. Resonant writing lives in what's left unsaid. A character dodging a question reveals more than any direct statement. Trained to produce text, not withhold it.

4. **Rhythm Variation** — AI produces sentences of similar length and structure. Use rhythm deliberately: shorten sentences as tension rises. Drop a short sentence after several long ones. Like that.

5. **Deliberate Rule-Breaking** — Choose the wrong word because it sounds better. Let a fragment hang. Incomplete sentences. For emphasis. Because sometimes a complete sentence kills the moment.

6. **Humor** — Classified as an "AI-complete problem." Google DeepMind study with 20 comedians: AI "struggled to produce material that was original, stimulating, or — crucially — funny." Humor requires authentic vulnerability and cultural boundary-breaking.

7. **Genuine Insight** — AI provides summaries; humans provide analysis. Keep asking "Why?" iteratively. Data shows the "what" — insight tells the "why."

## Structural Anti-Patterns

| Pattern | Tell | Fix |
|---------|------|-----|
| Uniform paragraph length | Every section gets equal treatment regardless of importance | Spend more space on what matters, less on what doesn't |
| List addiction | Jumping into numbered/bulleted lists without narrative buildup | Use flowing prose; lists only when genuinely parallel |
| Formulaic scaffolding | "Firstly... Secondly... Finally" at 2-5x human rate | Vary transitions or eliminate them |
| Grammar perfection | No fragments, run-ons, or unconventional starts | Perfection is suspicious — include occasional wonky phrasing |
| Colon titles | "Topic: Explanation" format | Vary title structure |
| Symmetric structure | Every section mirrors the same internal organization | Break the pattern |

## Punctuation and Formatting Rules

- **Em-dashes (—) and en-dashes (–)**: One of the most reliable AI tells. ChatGPT uses 8 per 573 words; Deepseek 9 per 555 words. Ban them entirely — use commas, periods, parentheses, or colons instead.
- **Curly quotation marks (" " ' ')**: ChatGPT and DeepSeek tend to produce curly quotes; Gemini and Claude tend to produce straight ("..." '...'). Curly quotes alone are not proof (word processors and typesetting tools auto-curl them) — but in combination with other tells they raise confidence. Prefer straight quotes for first-draft AI output; let the editor decide if curling is app

Related in Writing & Docs