implementation-wrapup
Complete a feature branch with test verification and PR creation. Triggers: "finish up", "create a PR", "wrap up the feature". Also invoked by iterative:implementing after all tasks are complete.
What this skill does
# Implementation Wrapup
Completes development with verification, optional review, and PR creation.
## When to Use
- After `iterative:implementing` skill completes all tasks
- When you're ready to create a PR
- When you want to finish a feature branch
- Can be invoked standalone on any branch
## Workflow
### Phase 1: Final Verification
1. Run full test suite. If tests fail, stop and report failures.
2. Check for uncommitted changes — commit or stash.
### Phase 2: Optional Code Review
When invoked from `iterative:implementing`, skip this phase — all code reviews are already complete.
When invoked standalone:
1. Present an interactive choice to the user — `AskUserQuestion` (Claude Code) or `request_user_input` (Codex): A) Full code review (recommended), B) Skip review.
2. If review: invoke `code-review` skill (1+ rounds).
3. Continue when review complete or skipped.
### Phase 3: Context Summary
1. Determine base branch (main/master/develop).
2. Check if in worktree.
3. Report: N commits, files changed, branch info.
### Phase 4: Present Options
Present an interactive choice to the user:
- A) Push + PR (recommended) — creates new PR, or shows existing if one exists
- B) Push only
- C) Keep branch, don't push
- D) Discard work (typed confirmation required)
### Phase 5: Execute
**Option A — Push + PR:** Push branch with `-u`, run `gh pr create`. If PR exists, show existing PR URL. If no PR, create one following repo conventions. Return PR URL.
**Option B — Push only:** Push branch, report remote URL.
**Option C — Keep:** Report branch preserved locally.
**Option D — Discard:** Require typed confirmation ("discard [branch-name]"). Delete branch (and worktree if applicable).
### Phase 6: Cleanup
1. If in worktree and work done, offer removal.
2. Switch to base branch if not in worktree.
## Safeguards
- **Never skip test verification** - tests must pass before any option
- **Never push with failing tests** - stop and report failures
- **Never discard without typed confirmation** - require exact branch name
- **git push prompts user** - not pre-approved, user confirms before pushing
## PR Description
When creating a PR:
- Follow repo conventions from AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md
- If no conventions: use conventional commits style
- Generate description from commit messages
- Keep title succinct and descriptive
## Output Format
```markdown
## Implementation Wrapup
### Verification
- Tests: PASS (N tests)
- Uncommitted changes: None / Committed
### Code Review
- Status: Completed / Skipped
- Issues addressed: N
### Summary
- Branch: feature/my-feature
- Base: main
- Commits: N
- Files changed: M
### Options
A) Push + Create PR (recommended)
B) Push only
C) Keep branch locally
D) Discard work
What would you like to do?
```
## After Completion
Returns:
- PR URL (if created)
- Branch status
- Cleanup status (worktree removed if applicable)
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.