Implementing Features
Execute specification-driven implementation with automatic quality gates, multi-agent orchestration, and progress tracking. Use when building features from specs, fixing bugs with test coverage, or refactoring with validation.
What this skill does
# Implementing Features I help you execute production-quality implementations with auto-detected language standards, intelligent agent orchestration, and specification integration. ## When to Use Me **Auto-activate when:** - Invoked via `/quaestor:implement` slash command - User mentions "build [specific feature]" or "fix [specific bug]" with context - Continuing implementation after planning phase is complete - User says "continue implementation" or "resume implementing" - Coordinating multi-agent implementation of an active specification **Do NOT auto-activate when:** - User says only "implement" or "implement it" (slash command handles this) - User is still in planning/research phase - Request is vague without feature details ## Supporting Files This skill uses several supporting files for detailed workflows: - **@WORKFLOW.md** - 4-phase implementation process (Discovery → Planning → Implementation → Validation) - **@AGENTS.md** - Agent orchestration strategies and coordination patterns - **@QUALITY.md** - Language-specific quality standards and validation gates - **@SPECS.md** - Specification integration and tracking protocols ## My Process I follow a structured 4-phase workflow to ensure quality and completeness: ### Phase 1: Discovery & Research 🔍 **Specification Integration:** - Check `.quaestor/specs/active/` for in-progress work - Search `.quaestor/specs/draft/` for matching specifications - Move draft spec → active folder (if space available, max 3) - Update spec status → "in_progress" **Research Protocol:** - Analyze codebase patterns & conventions - Identify dependencies & integration points - Determine required agents based on task requirements **See @WORKFLOW.md Phase 1 for complete discovery process** ### Phase 2: Planning & Approval 📋 **Present Implementation Strategy:** - Architecture decisions & trade-offs - File changes & new components required - Quality gates & validation approach - Risk assessment & mitigation **MANDATORY: Get user approval before proceeding** **See @WORKFLOW.md Phase 2 for planning details** ### Phase 3: Implementation ⚡ **Agent Orchestration:** - **Multi-file operations** → Use researcher + implementer agents - **System refactoring** → Use architect + refactorer agents - **Test creation** → Use qa agent for comprehensive coverage - **Security implementation** → Use security + implementer agents **Quality Cycle** (every 3 edits): ``` Execute → Validate → Fix (if ❌) → Continue ``` **See @AGENTS.md for complete agent coordination strategies** ### Phase 4: Validation & Completion ✅ **Quality Validation:** 1. Detect project language (Python, Rust, JS/TS, Go, or Generic) 2. Load language-specific standards from @QUALITY.md 3. Run validation pipeline for detected language 4. Fix any issues and re-validate **Completion Criteria:** - ✅ All tests passing - ✅ Zero linting errors - ✅ Type checking clean (if applicable) - ✅ Documentation complete - ✅ Specification status updated **See @QUALITY.md for dispatch to language-specific standards:** - `@languages/PYTHON.md` - Python projects - `@languages/RUST.md` - Rust projects - `@languages/JAVASCRIPT.md` - JS/TS projects - `@languages/GO.md` - Go projects - `@languages/GENERIC.md` - Other languages ## Auto-Intelligence ### Project Detection - **Language**: Auto-detect → Python|Rust|JS|Generic standards - **Scope**: Assess changes → Single-file|Multi-file|System-wide - **Context**: Identify requirements → architecture|security|testing|refactoring ### Execution Strategy - **System-wide**: Comprehensive planning with multiple agent coordination - **Feature Development**: Iterative implementation with testing - **Bug Fixes**: Focused resolution with validation ## Agent Coordination **I coordinate with specialized agents based on task requirements:** - **workflow-coordinator** - First! Validates workflow state and ensures planning phase completed - **implementer** - Builds features according to specification - **architect** - Designs system architecture when needed - **security** - Reviews auth, encryption, or access control - **qa** - Creates comprehensive tests alongside implementation - **refactorer** - Ensures consistency across multiple files - **researcher** - Maps dependencies for multi-file changes **See @AGENTS.md for agent chaining patterns and coordination strategies** ## Specification Integration **Auto-Update Protocol:** **Pre-Implementation:** - Check `.quaestor/specs/draft/` for matching spec ID - Move spec from draft/ → active/ (max 3 active) - Declare: "Working on Spec: [ID] - [Title]" - Update phase status in spec file **Post-Implementation:** - Update phase status → "completed" - Track acceptance criteria completion - Move spec to completed/ when all phases done - Create git commit with spec reference **See @SPECS.md for complete specification integration details** ## Quality Gates **Code Quality Checkpoints:** - Function exceeds 50 lines → Use refactorer agent to break into smaller functions - Nesting depth exceeds 3 → Use refactorer agent to simplify logic - Circular dependencies detected → Use architect agent to review design - Performance implications unclear → Use implementer agent to add measurements **See @QUALITY.md for language-specific quality gates and standards** ## Success Criteria - ✅ Workflow coordinator validates planning phase completed - ✅ Specification identified and moved to active/ - ✅ User approval obtained for implementation strategy - ✅ All quality gates passed (linting, tests, type checking) - ✅ Documentation updated - ✅ Specification status updated and tracked - ✅ Ready for review phase ## Final Response When implementation is complete: ``` Implementation complete. All quality gates passed. Specification [ID] updated to completed status. Ready for review and PR creation. ``` **See @WORKFLOW.md for complete workflow details** --- *Intelligent implementation with agent orchestration, quality gates, and specification tracking*
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.