independent-research
Use when about to ask the user a factual question, propose a solution, diagnose an error, or choose between approaches. Triggers on: 'Do you have X installed?', 'What version?', 'Is X configured?', 'We should...', 'The fix is...', 'Options: 1...', 'Based on my understanding...', 'I believe X supports...'. Before deciding anything, spin up parallel subagents to WebSearch for current docs, community solutions, framework best practices, and GitHub issues. Your memory is stale โ verify everything.
What this skill does
# Independent Research Research-driven investigation. Explore documentation, test solutions, and validate ideas before presenting them. ## Critical Rules ๐จ **NEVER ASK FACTUAL QUESTIONS YOU CAN ANSWER YOURSELF.** If a command, config file, or web search can answer it, use that. Only ask users about preferences and priorities. ๐จ **VALIDATE BEFORE PRESENTING.** Test commands, verify syntax, check documentation. Never present untested recommendations. ## Lazy Question Detection If you catch yourself about to ask any of these, STOP. Answer it yourself. | Lazy Question | What To Do Instead | |---|---| | "Do you have X installed?" | Run `which X` or `X --version` | | "What version of X?" | Run `X --version` | | "Is X configured?" | Check the config file | | "What OS are you using?" | Run `uname -a` | | "Which tool do you use for X?" | Check `which`/`where`, look at project config | | "Was this working before?" | Check git log, recent changes | | "Do you want me to..." | Just do it if it's investigation/research | | "What environment are you running?" | Check env vars, config files, runtime versions | | "Have you tried X?" | Try it yourself first | ## Anti-pattern ### โ Asking Instead of Investigating ``` โบ NX project graph failed โ Node.js v24 compatibility issue. โบ Do you have nvm/fnm/volta installed? Was this working on a different Node version? ``` The user doesn't need to answer this. You have bash. ```bash which nvm; which fnm; which volta node --version cat .nvmrc 2>/dev/null cat package.json | grep -A2 '"engines"' git log --oneline -20 ``` ## Premature Decision Detection If you catch yourself about to recommend, diagnose, or decide without having researched, STOP. | Premature Decision Signal | What To Do Instead | |---|---| | "We should downgrade/upgrade X" | Spin up parallel subagents: one to WebSearch the error + framework version, one to fetch the framework's migration/compatibility docs, one to search GitHub issues for the exact error | | "The fix is to..." | Search for the exact error message first. Find the GitHub issue. Read the fix. Don't guess from memory | | "This is a known issue with X" | Prove it. Fetch the GitHub issue URL, the changelog entry, the docs page. If you can't link to it, you're guessing | | "Options: 1. X, 2. Y" | Before presenting options, WebSearch for what the framework/community actually recommends. Check migration guides, official docs, recent blog posts | | "I believe X supports Y" / "Based on my understanding" | That's stale memory. WebFetch the actual docs page. Check the release notes. Verify the version compatibility matrix | | Choosing between tools/versions/approaches | Launch parallel subagents: one per approach, each researching current docs, community consensus, and known issues | | Error you haven't seen before | WebSearch the exact error message in quotes. Check GitHub issues. Check Stack Overflow. Check the framework's Discord/discussions | | Recommending a config change | Fetch the framework's current configuration docs. Don't rely on what you remember the API being | ๐จ **Be paranoid that you're missing a better solution.** Your training data is stale. Libraries release weekly. Frameworks ship breaking changes. The answer you "know" may be outdated. Launch subagents to verify in parallel โ it costs seconds and saves hours of wrong-direction work. ๐จ **Concrete actions, not vague research:** - **WebSearch** the exact error message, the framework + version, the specific compatibility question - **WebFetch** the official docs page, the changelog, the migration guide - **Launch parallel subagents** when multiple angles need investigating simultaneously - **Check GitHub issues** for the exact error โ someone has probably hit this before - **Read the actual release notes** โ don't guess what version supports what ## When to Ask vs Research **Research yourself (facts):** - What's installed, what version, what's configured - Whether something is compatible - What the error means - What solutions exist **Ask the user (preferences):** - Which approach they prefer - What their priorities are - Design decisions with multiple valid options - Business context you can't infer ## Mandatory Checklist Before asking the user a question: 1. [ ] Verify this is a preference/priority question, NOT a factual question 2. [ ] Verify you cannot answer it with a command, config file read, or web search 3. [ ] Verify you have already tried to answer it yourself Do not ask until all checks pass. ๐จ **REMEMBER: Every lazy question wastes the user's time and signals incompetence. If you can look it up, look it up.**
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.