industry-pe-ratios
Retrieve industry-specific P/E ratios using Octagon MCP. Use when comparing company valuations to specific industry peers, analyzing sub-sector valuations, and understanding niche market valuations beyond broad sector averages.
What this skill does
# Industry P/E Ratios
Retrieve price-to-earnings ratios by specific industry and exchange using the Octagon MCP server.
## Prerequisites
Ensure Octagon MCP is configured in your AI agent (Cursor, Claude Desktop, Windsurf, etc.). See [references/mcp-setup.md](references/mcp-setup.md) for installation instructions.
## Workflow
### 1. Identify Parameters
Determine your query parameters:
- **Date**: Specific date for the data
- **Exchange**: NYSE, NASDAQ, etc.
- **Industry**: Semiconductors, Software, Biotechnology, etc.
### 2. Execute Query via Octagon MCP
Use the `octagon-agent` tool with a natural language prompt:
```
Retrieve the latest industry P/E ratios for <DATE>, filtered by exchange <EXCHANGE> and industry <INDUSTRY>.
```
**MCP Call Format:**
```json
{
"server": "octagon-mcp",
"toolName": "octagon-agent",
"arguments": {
"prompt": "Retrieve the latest industry P/E ratios for 2025-02-03, filtered by exchange NYSE and industry Semiconductors."
}
}
```
### 3. Expected Output
The agent returns industry P/E data:
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Industry | Semiconductors |
| Exchange | NYSE |
| P/E Ratio | 12.47 |
| Date | 2025-02-03 |
| Example Company | ON Semiconductor (ON) |
**Data Sources**: octagon-companies-agent, octagon-financials-agent, octagon-sec-agent, octagon-web-search-agent
### 4. Interpret Results
See [references/interpreting-results.md](references/interpreting-results.md) for guidance on:
- Comparing company P/E to industry P/E
- Industry vs. sector differences
- Cross-industry analysis
- Peer group valuation
## Example Queries
**Specific Industry and Exchange:**
```
Retrieve the latest industry P/E ratios for 2025-02-03, filtered by exchange NYSE and industry Semiconductors.
```
**NASDAQ Industry:**
```
Get P/E ratios for the Software industry on NASDAQ.
```
**Industry Comparison:**
```
Compare P/E ratios for Semiconductors, Software, and Internet industries.
```
**Historical Trend:**
```
What is the historical P/E trend for the Biotechnology industry?
```
**Peer Analysis:**
```
What are the P/E ratios for companies in the Electric Vehicles industry?
```
## Industry vs. Sector
### Hierarchy
```
Sector (Broad) → Industry (Specific) → Sub-Industry (Niche)
```
### Example
| Level | Example |
|-------|---------|
| Sector | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors |
| Sub-Industry | Memory Chips |
### Why Industry Matters
| Comparison | Purpose |
|------------|---------|
| Sector P/E | Broad market context |
| Industry P/E | Peer group benchmark |
| Company P/E | Specific valuation |
## Common Industries
### Technology Sector Industries
| Industry | Typical P/E Range |
|----------|-------------------|
| Semiconductors | 15-35 |
| Software | 25-50 |
| IT Services | 18-30 |
| Hardware | 15-25 |
| Internet | 30-60 |
### Healthcare Sector Industries
| Industry | Typical P/E Range |
|----------|-------------------|
| Biotechnology | 20-40 (or N/A) |
| Pharmaceuticals | 15-25 |
| Medical Devices | 25-40 |
| Healthcare Services | 18-28 |
| Health Insurance | 12-20 |
### Financial Sector Industries
| Industry | Typical P/E Range |
|----------|-------------------|
| Banks | 10-15 |
| Insurance | 10-18 |
| Asset Management | 12-20 |
| REITs | 15-25 |
| Fintech | 25-50 |
### Consumer Sector Industries
| Industry | Typical P/E Range |
|----------|-------------------|
| Retail | 15-25 |
| Restaurants | 20-35 |
| Apparel | 15-25 |
| Automotive | 8-15 |
| E-commerce | 30-60 |
### Industrial Sector Industries
| Industry | Typical P/E Range |
|----------|-------------------|
| Aerospace & Defense | 18-25 |
| Machinery | 15-22 |
| Transportation | 12-20 |
| Construction | 12-18 |
| Electrical Equipment | 18-28 |
## Using Industry P/E for Analysis
### Company Valuation Context
| Comparison | Interpretation |
|------------|----------------|
| Company P/E < Industry P/E | Potential value or concerns |
| Company P/E = Industry P/E | Fairly valued vs. peers |
| Company P/E > Industry P/E | Premium for quality/growth |
### Premium/Discount Calculation
```
Premium/Discount = (Company P/E - Industry P/E) / Industry P/E × 100%
```
### Example
- Company P/E: 18
- Industry P/E (Semiconductors): 12.47
- Premium: (18 - 12.47) / 12.47 = +44.3% (trading at premium)
## Peer Group Analysis
### Defining Peer Groups
| Approach | Method |
|----------|--------|
| Same Industry | Direct competitors |
| Similar Size | Market cap range |
| Similar Growth | Growth rate bands |
| Similar Model | Business model match |
### Peer Comparison Framework
| Metric | Compare |
|--------|---------|
| P/E vs. Industry | Relative value |
| Growth vs. Industry | Growth premium |
| Margins vs. Industry | Quality premium |
| Size vs. Industry | Scale premium |
## Industry Characteristics
### High P/E Industries
| Industry | Why Higher P/E |
|----------|----------------|
| Software | Recurring revenue, scalability |
| Biotech | Pipeline optionality |
| E-commerce | Growth potential |
| Cloud | Secular growth trend |
### Low P/E Industries
| Industry | Why Lower P/E |
|----------|----------------|
| Banks | Cyclical, regulated |
| Insurance | Mature, capital-intensive |
| Utilities | Slow growth, stable |
| Commodities | Cyclical, price-takers |
## Exchange Considerations
### NYSE vs. NASDAQ
| Exchange | Industry Mix |
|----------|--------------|
| NYSE | More diversified, traditional |
| NASDAQ | Tech-heavy, growth-oriented |
### Same Industry, Different Exchange
| Consideration | Impact |
|---------------|--------|
| Different companies | Different P/E averages |
| Liquidity differences | Valuation premiums |
| Listing requirements | Company quality |
## Common Use Cases
### Stock Valuation
```
Is AMD's P/E reasonable compared to the Semiconductor industry?
```
### Industry Selection
```
Which industries have the most attractive valuations?
```
### Peer Benchmarking
```
How does NVDA's valuation compare to semiconductor peers?
```
### M&A Analysis
```
What P/E is typical for Software industry acquisitions?
```
## Analysis Tips
1. **Use industry, not just sector**: More precise comparison.
2. **Consider growth rates**: Higher growth justifies higher P/E.
3. **Check profitability mix**: Loss-making companies distort averages.
4. **Compare apples to apples**: Same business model.
5. **Adjust for size**: Large-caps often command premiums.
6. **Look at sub-industries**: Even more precise comparisons.
## Integration with Other Skills
| Skill | Combined Use |
|-------|--------------|
| sector-pe-ratios | Industry vs. sector context |
| financial-metrics-analysis | Company P/E details |
| income-statement | Earnings driving P/E |
| stock-performance | Price trends within industry |
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.