insforge-integrations
Use when wiring an external auth provider (Clerk, Auth0, WorkOS, Kinde, Stytch, Better Auth) into InsForge for JWT-based RLS, or when adding the OKX x402 payment facilitator for onchain pay-per-use billing.
What this skill does
# InsForge Integrations
This skill covers integrating **third-party providers** with InsForge. Currently two categories are supported: **auth providers** (RLS via JWT claims) and **payment facilitators** (x402 HTTP payment protocol). Each provider has its own guide under this directory.
## Auth Providers
| Provider | Guide | When to use |
|----------|-------|-------------|
| [Clerk](references/clerk.md) | Clerk JWT Templates + InsForge RLS | Clerk signs tokens directly via JWT Template — no server-side signing needed |
| [Auth0](references/auth0.md) | Auth0 Actions + InsForge RLS | Auth0 uses a post-login Action to embed claims into the access token |
| [WorkOS](references/workos.md) | WorkOS AuthKit + InsForge RLS | WorkOS AuthKit middleware + server-side JWT signing with `jsonwebtoken` |
| [Kinde](references/kinde.md) | Kinde + InsForge RLS | Kinde token customization for InsForge integration |
| [Stytch](references/stytch.md) | Stytch + InsForge RLS | Stytch session tokens for InsForge integration |
| [Better Auth](references/better-auth.md) | Better Auth + InsForge RLS | Self-hosted auth running in your InsForge Postgres — no third-party SaaS, no per-MAU cost |
## Payment Facilitators
| Provider | Guide | When to use |
|----------|-------|-------------|
| [OKX x402](references/okx-x402.md) | OKX as x402 facilitator (USDG on X Layer) | Pay-per-use HTTP endpoints settled onchain with zero gas for the payer |
## Common Patterns
### Auth providers
1. **Provider signs or issues a JWT** containing the user's ID
2. **JWT is passed to InsForge** via `edgeFunctionToken` in `createClient()`
3. **InsForge exposes claims** through `auth.jwt()` in SQL
4. **RLS policies** use a `requesting_user_id()` function to enforce row-level security
### Payment facilitators (x402)
1. **Server returns `402 Payment Required`** with a JSON challenge base64-encoded in `PAYMENT-REQUIRED` header
2. **Client signs an EIP-3009 authorization** using the stablecoin's EIP-712 domain
3. **Server forwards the signed payload** to the facilitator's `/verify` + `/settle` endpoints
4. **Server records the settled payment** in an InsForge table with a realtime trigger for live dashboards
## Choosing a Provider
**Auth**
- **Clerk** — Simplest setup; JWT Template handles signing, no server code needed
- **Auth0** — Flexible; uses post-login Actions for claim injection
- **WorkOS** — Enterprise-focused; AuthKit middleware + server-side JWT signing
- **Kinde** — Developer-friendly; built-in token customization
- **Stytch** — API-first; session-based token flow
- **Better Auth** — Self-hosted in your Postgres; no SaaS vendor; you own the user table. Pairs cleanly with InsForge's Postgres via a connection string + a small bridge route. Requires a one-time `REVOKE` after migrate to seal PostgREST exposure.
**Payment facilitators**
- **OKX x402** — Onchain pay-per-use via USDG on X Layer; zero gas for the payer
## Setup
1. Identify which provider the project uses
2. Read the corresponding reference guide from the tables above
3. Follow the provider-specific setup steps
## Usage Examples
Each provider guide includes full code examples for:
- Provider dashboard configuration (API keys, application settings, etc.)
- Server and client code (JWT utilities for auth; facilitator client + signing utilities for payments)
- Database setup (RLS for auth; payment table + realtime trigger for payments)
- Environment variable setup
Refer to the specific `references/<provider>.md` file for complete examples.
## Best Practices
**Auth**
- All auth provider user IDs are strings (not UUIDs) — always use `TEXT` columns for `user_id`
- Use `requesting_user_id()` instead of `auth.uid()` for RLS policies
- Set `edgeFunctionToken` as an async function (Clerk) or server-signed JWT (Auth0, WorkOS, Kinde, Stytch)
- Always get the JWT secret via `npx @insforge/cli secrets get JWT_SECRET`
**Payment facilitators (x402)**
- Always check the result of the database `insert(...)` after settlement — settlement takes money onchain before the insert runs; a silent DB failure loses the record
- Add `UNIQUE` to the `tx_hash` column to prevent duplicate records from retries
- Verify EIP-712 domain (`name`, `version`) against the token contract's on-chain `DOMAIN_SEPARATOR` — wrong values produce `Invalid Authority` errors
- Use a `MOCK_OKX_FACILITATOR` env flag for local dev so the full flow can be exercised without real funds
## Common Mistakes
**Auth**
| Mistake | Solution |
|---------|----------|
| Using `auth.uid()` for RLS | Use `requesting_user_id()` — third-party IDs are strings, not UUIDs |
| Using UUID columns for `user_id` | Use `TEXT` — all supported providers use string-format IDs |
| Hardcoding the JWT secret | Always retrieve via `npx @insforge/cli secrets get JWT_SECRET` |
| Missing `requesting_user_id()` function | Must be created before RLS policies will work |
**Payments (x402)**
| Mistake | Solution |
|---------|----------|
| Using an OKX exchange trading API key | Create a separate Web3 API key at `web3.okx.com/onchainos/dev-portal` |
| Wrong EIP-712 domain values | Read the token contract's `DOMAIN_SEPARATOR` — for USDG on X Layer use `name: "Global Dollar"`, `version: "1"` |
| Ignoring DB insert error after settlement | Always destructure `{ error }` and log/handle it — money has already moved |
| `MOCK_OKX_FACILITATOR=true` in production | Mock mode is demo-only; it returns fake tx hashes and bypasses verification |
Related in Sales & CRM
process-mapper
IncludedUse when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being worked, and quantify the gap between processing time and total elapsed time. Pairs Lean / Six Sigma / Theory-of-Constraints canon with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a process map, a ranked bottleneck list (with severity + root-cause hypothesis), and a cycle-time analysis (P50, P90, value-add ratio, Little's-Law throughput). Distinct from sales-pipeline, system-reliability (SLO), and strategic-OKR work — this is tactical process documentation for internal operations.
payment-integration
IncludedIntegrate payments with SePay (VietQR), Polar, Stripe, Paddle (MoR subscriptions), Creem.io (licensing). Checkout, webhooks, subscriptions, QR codes, multi-provider orders.
customer-success-manager
IncludedMonitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success
sales-engineer
IncludedAnalyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.
customer-success-manager
IncludedMonitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success
sales-engineer
IncludedAnalyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.