issue-reporting
Helps users report issues with GTM skills — incorrect advice, broken activation, missing context, or unexpected behavior. Guides through gathering the right details (skill name, prompt used, actual vs expected output, context files present) and generates a properly formatted GitHub issue. Use when users say: 'this skill gave wrong advice', 'report a bug', 'file an issue', 'skill isn't working', 'wrong output', 'skill didn't activate', 'bad recommendation', 'incorrect behavior', or 'something is broken'.
What this skill does
# Issue Reporting
## Workspace Context
Read bootstrap context before asking questions: `strategy/brand.md` for brand, audience, offer, channels, tools, constraints, and metrics; `about/me.md` for personal voice; `content/ideas.md` and `content/calendar.md` for content planning. Use legacy product-marketing context files only as fallback. Save generated drafts to `content/<platform>/drafts/YYYY-MM-DD_short-topic-slug.md`, and route durable learnings back to `strategy/brand.md`, `about/me.md`, or `content/ideas.md`.
## Operating Contract
This skill is self-contained for its frontmatter scope: use its local instructions, references, scripts, and assets as the playbook; ask only for missing task-specific inputs; hand off to adjacent skills instead of expanding scope; and return an actionable artifact, decision, plan, draft, or diagnostic.
Help users report problems with GTM skills clearly and completely so maintainers can fix them fast.
## When This Skill Activates
- User says a skill gave wrong or harmful advice
- User says a skill isn't activating when it should
- User says their brand context wasn't applied
- User says output format is wrong or unexpected
- User wants to report a bug or file an issue
- User says "something is broken" about a skill
## Step 1 — Identify the Problem
Ask the user what went wrong. Determine:
1. **Which skill** — get the exact skill name (e.g. `seo-and-aeo-strategy`, `copywriting-core`)
2. **What they asked** — the exact prompt or task they gave Claude
3. **What happened** — the actual output or behavior
4. **What they expected** — what should have happened instead
If the user is vague ("it gave bad advice"), ask specifically what was incorrect and why.
## Step 2 — Gather Context
Check the user's project for context that helps diagnose the issue:
### Context files
Check if these exist and note their presence:
- `strategy/brand.md` — brand positioning, messaging, audience
- `about/me.md` — personal voice, writing style
- `CLAUDE.md` — AI instructions
Missing context files are the **most common cause** of "wrong advice" bugs. If `strategy/brand.md` or `about/me.md` are missing, tell the user:
> "The skill may have given generic advice because your brand context files are missing. Run `/bootstrap` to set them up. If the skill still gives wrong advice after that, then it's a real bug worth reporting."
### Plugin version
Check `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` for the current version number.
### Installation method
Ask how they installed the plugin (Claude Code, Cowork, Skills CLI, git clone, submodule).
## Step 3 — Classify the Issue
Categorize into one of these types:
| Type | Description | Common cause |
|---|---|---|
| Wrong advice | Skill produced incorrect or harmful recommendations | Outdated framework, wrong domain assumptions |
| Not activating | Skill should have triggered but didn't | Description mismatch, trigger phrase gap |
| Wrong activation | Skill triggered when it shouldn't have | Overly broad description |
| Missing context | Brand/voice not applied to output | Context files missing or not read |
| Bad format | Output structure is wrong | Skill template issue |
| Crash/error | Skill fails mid-execution | Syntax error in skill, bad reference path |
## Step 4 — Generate the Issue
Compose a GitHub issue using the bug report template. Format it so the user can copy-paste or click through:
**Direct link** (pre-fills the template):
```
https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin/issues/new?template=bug_report.yml
```
**Formatted issue body** (if they prefer to paste manually):
```markdown
**Skill**: [skill-name]
**Type**: [category from Step 3]
**Plugin Version**: [version]
**Installation**: [method]
### What I asked
[exact prompt]
### What happened
[actual output — include relevant excerpt]
### What I expected
[expected behavior]
### Context files present
- [ ] strategy/brand.md
- [ ] about/me.md
- [ ] CLAUDE.md
### Steps to reproduce
1. [step-by-step if applicable]
### Impact
[Critical / High / Medium / Low]
```
## Step 5 — Offer Next Steps
After generating the issue:
1. Give them the direct link to file it: `https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin/issues/new?template=bug_report.yml`
2. If the problem is missing context files, suggest running `/bootstrap` first
3. If it's clearly a skill bug, encourage them to file it — it helps improve the plugin for everyone
4. Thank them for reporting — contributors who file clear issues are invaluable
## Important
- Never dismiss user frustration — if they think the advice is wrong, take it seriously
- Don't try to fix the skill yourself — this skill is for *reporting*, not patching
- Be specific in the issue — vague reports like "it didn't work" are hard to act on
- Include the actual output when possible — maintainers need to see what went wrong
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.