Jira Orchestration Workflow
This skill should be used when the user asks to "orchestrate jira", "work on issue", "complete jira ticket", "development workflow", "jira automation", "issue lifecycle", "work on story", "fix bug ticket", or needs guidance on coordinating development work through Jira with multi-agent orchestration patterns.
What this skill does
# Jira Orchestration Workflow Execute 6-phase protocol for coordinating Jira-based development work with multi-agent orchestration. ## When to Use - Starting work on Jira issues (Bug, Story, Task, Epic) - Automating development workflows - Tracking progress and linking commits/PRs - Coordinating multi-agent work ## The 6-Phase Protocol **EXPLORE → PLAN → CODE → TEST → FIX → COMMIT** Each phase must complete validation gates before proceeding. ### Phase 1: EXPLORE - Fetch issue details, acceptance criteria, linked issues - Analyze affected codebase areas and dependencies - Agents: requirements-analyzer, dependency-mapper - Outputs: Issue analysis, affected files, dependency map, risk assessment - Jira: Transition to "In Progress", add analysis comment, log effort ### Phase 2: PLAN - Design solution, break into subtasks, create task DAG - Plan file changes, define success criteria - Agents (by type): Bug→triage-agent; Story→requirements-analyzer; Task→task-enricher; Epic→epic-decomposer - Outputs: Implementation plan, test plan, rollback strategy - Jira: Create sub-tasks, add plan comment, update estimate ### Phase 3: CODE - Execute DAG tasks in parallel - Implement changes, add docs and error handling - Agents (by tech): Frontend→requirements-analyzer; Backend→requirements-analyzer; DevOps→infrastructure-orchestrator - Outputs: Code changes, configs, migration scripts - Jira: Add progress comments, log time spent, flag blockers ### Phase 4: TEST - Run unit/integration/E2E tests, verify acceptance criteria - Agents: test-strategist, qa-ticket-reviewer, test-strategist - Outputs: Test results, coverage, performance metrics - Jira: Add test results, attach reports - Failure: Return to FIX, do NOT complete issue ### Phase 5: FIX - Debug failures, address code review feedback - Re-run tests until passing (max 3 iterations before escalation) - Agents: hypothesis-debugger, review-orchestrator, code-quality-enforcer - Loop: Return to TEST after fixes ### Phase 6: COMMIT - Create PR with issue key, link to Jira, request review - Format: `[ISSUE-KEY] description\n\nResolves: ISSUE-KEY` - Agents: commit-orchestrator, pr-creator, documentation-hub - Jira: Add PR link, transition to "In Review" ## Agent Selection | Issue Type | Primary | Secondary | |-----------|---------|-----------| | Bug | triage-agent, hypothesis-debugger | root-cause-analyzer, test-strategist | | Story | requirements-analyzer, code-architect | requirements-analyzer | | Task | task-enricher | technology-specific | | Epic | epic-decomposer | split into stories first | | Spike | requirements-analyzer, requirements-analyzer | domain experts | By Technology: Frontend→react-specialist; Backend→api-specialist; DevOps→infrastructure-orchestrator; Mobile→mobile-developer By Priority: Blocker→triage-agent + escalate; Critical→senior agents + extended thinking; High→standard selection; Medium/Low→optimize for efficiency ## Blocker Handling **Mark blocker when:** Missing requirements, dependencies, technical limits, security concerns, breaking changes. **Immediate:** Add "Blocked" label, create detailed comment, link blocking issue, notify stakeholders. **Escalate when:** Persists >4 hours, beyond agent authority, security vulnerability, breaking changes, customer impact, legal/compliance questions. **Process:** Pause, document context, create Jira comment, tag humans, transition to "Waiting for Support". ## Human Involvement **Always required:** Security changes, breaking API/DB changes, infrastructure, customer-facing features, compliance. **Optional (post-review):** Bug fixes, docs, tests, refactoring. ## Progress Tracking **Update Jira at:** Phase transitions, blockers, test failures, PR creation, hourly. **Status format:** ``` ## Progress - Phase: [NAME] - Completed: [items] - In Progress: [items] (X%) - Blocked: [items] ([reason]) - Next: [steps] - Time Spent: Xh Ym ``` **Metrics:** Velocity (story points/sprint), Cycle Time (In Progress→Done), Lead Time (creation→completion), Work Log (time/phase). ## Best Practices - Never skip phases (critical validations at each) - Checkpoint between phases for recovery - Run independent tasks in parallel - Use 3-5 agents minimum, 13 maximum - Frequent Jira updates: comments, work logs, links, labels, components - Quality gates: All tests passing, >80% coverage, no vulnerabilities, docs updated, human review ## Workflows by Issue Type **Bug:** EXPLORE (reproduce)→PLAN (fix design)→CODE→TEST (add regression)→FIX→COMMIT **Story:** EXPLORE→PLAN (subtasks)→CODE (parallel)→TEST (E2E)→FIX→COMMIT **Epic:** Decompose into Stories, execute each Story workflow, integrate results ## PR/Commit Format **PR Title:** `[ISSUE-KEY] Brief description` **Commit:** ``` [ISSUE-KEY] description Changes: - item1 - item2 Resolves: ISSUE-KEY ``` **Branch:** `[type]/[issue-key]-[description]` (e.g., feature/PROJ-123-auth) **Smart commits:** `[ISSUE-KEY] #comment text` | `#time 2h 30m` | `#transition In Review` ## Quality Gates - [ ] All tests passing (unit, integration, E2E) - [ ] Coverage >80% - [ ] No security vulnerabilities - [ ] No breaking changes (or documented) - [ ] Documentation updated - [ ] PR created and linked - [ ] Human review requested - [ ] Acceptance criteria met ## Example: Bug Fix **Issue:** PROJ-123 "Login timeout after 5 minutes" | Phase | Activity | Agents | |-------|----------|--------| | EXPLORE | Analyze auth code, identify JWT expiry | requirements-analyzer, security-specialist | | PLAN | Design fix: extend expiry, fix cleanup | triage-agent | | CODE | Update JWT config, implement refresh | requirements-analyzer, security-specialist | | TEST | Unit/integration/manual tests | test-strategist, qa-ticket-reviewer | | FIX | No fixes needed | - | | COMMIT | Create PR, link to PROJ-123 | commit-orchestrator | ## Integration Works with: jira (API), git-workflows (branches/PRs), orchestration-patterns (agent coordination), testing (test execution), debugging (root cause analysis).
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.