landscape-mapping
Gate 2 - Surface Decision Points, Intersections, alternatives, and initial Knowns/Unknowns
What this skill does
# Gate 2: Landscape Mapping **Purpose:** Map the structure of the decision before gathering evidence. **Announce:** "Moving to Landscape Gate - let's map the decision structure." ## Entry Criteria - Thesis Gate completed - Decision statement is clear - Weight confirmed ## Process ### 1. Surface Alternatives Always include "do nothing" as an explicit option. Ask: - What are the options we're considering? - Are there options we haven't considered? - What would a contrarian suggest? Document each alternative with a brief description. ### 2. Identify Decision Points For each alternative, surface the underlying assumptions and choices. **Decision Point format:** - Statement: "We assume [X]" or "We would choose [Y]" - Type: *assumption* (we believe) or *choice* (we decide) - Confidence: *high / medium / low / unknown* Ask probing questions one at a time: - What has to be true for this to work? - What are we assuming about the market/customers/technology? - What choices does this lock us into? ### 3. Map Decision Intersections Identify relationships between Decision Points: - **Depends on**: If A is wrong, B doesn't matter - **Conflicts with**: A and B can't both be true - **Reinforces**: A being true strengthens B ### 4. Initial Knowns/Unknowns Categorize what we know: - **Known**: We have reliable information - **Unknown-Knowable**: We could find out with research - **Unknown-Unknowable**: Cannot be determined; must assume ## Depth by Weight | Aspect | Light | Medium | Complete | |--------|-------|--------|----------| | Alternatives | 2-3 + do nothing | 4-5 + do nothing | 5-6+ + creative options | | Decision Points | Surface (3-5) | Thorough (6-10) | Comprehensive (10+) | | Intersections | Note obvious | Map dependencies | Full analysis | | Knowns/Unknowns | Quick categorization | Standard matrix | Detailed with confidence | **Light:** Quick alternative generation. Surface-level Decision Points. Note obvious intersections only. **Medium:** Thorough alternative exploration. Full Decision Point mapping. Standard intersection analysis. **Complete:** Generate creative/unconventional alternatives. Comprehensive Decision Points. Full intersection mapping with relationship types. ## Upgrade Detection **Suggest upgrading if:** - More alternatives emerge than expected for the weight level - Decision Points reveal unexpected complexity - Multiple conflicting intersections surface - User expresses uncertainty about key assumptions **Upgrade prompt:** ``` ⚠️ This decision is more complex than initially appeared - [X alternatives emerged / multiple conflicting assumptions / etc.] Current: [Weight] (~X min remaining) Suggested: [Higher Weight] (~Y min remaining) The deeper analysis would help us [specific benefit]. Continue at current depth, or upgrade? ``` ## Output Update decision artifact with: ```markdown ## Landscape Gate Summary ### Alternatives 1. **[Option A]**: [description] 2. **[Option B]**: [description] 3. **Do nothing**: [what happens] ### Decision Points | ID | Statement | Type | Confidence | Alternative | |----|-----------|------|------------|-------------| | DP1 | [assumption/choice] | assumption | medium | Option A | | DP2 | [assumption/choice] | choice | high | Option A | | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ### Decision Intersections - DP1 **depends on** DP3 - DP2 **conflicts with** DP5 - DP4 **reinforces** DP1 ### Knowns/Unknowns **Known:** - [fact with source] **Unknown-Knowable:** - [question we can research] **Unknown-Unknowable:** - [thing we must assume] ``` ## Exit Criteria - All realistic alternatives documented (including "do nothing") - Decision Points surfaced for each alternative (depth per weight) - Intersections mapped (depth per weight) - Knowns/Unknowns categorized ## Bias Watch Watch for: - **Anchoring** - Over-weighting the first option considered - **Confirmation bias** - Only surfacing assumptions that support preferred option - **Groupthink** - Missing alternatives that challenge consensus ## Next Gate Proceed to: `deliberate-decisions:deep-research`
Related in General
modeling-omnistudio-epc-catalog
IncludedSalesforce Industries CME EPC product-modeling skill for Product2-based catalog creation. Use when creating EPC products, configuring product attributes, building offer bundles with Product Child Items, or reviewing EPC DataPack JSON metadata for product catalog changes. TRIGGER when: user creates or updates Product2 EPC records, AttributeAssignment payloads, AttributeMetadata/AttributeDefaultValues, Offer bundles, or ProductChildItem relationships. DO NOT TRIGGER when: designing OmniScripts/FlexCards/Integration Procedures (use building-omnistudio-omniscript, building-omnistudio-flexcard, or building-omnistudio-integration-procedure), implementing Apex business logic (use generating-apex), or troubleshooting deployment pipelines (use deploying-metadata).
relationship-science-coach
IncludedUse this skill for direct, practical adult relationship coaching: couples conflict, repair, trust, marriage, dating, flirting, attachment patterns, emotional connection, sex, desire differences, eroticism, kink negotiation, affection, love languages, breakups, and long-term passion. Draw on Gottman, EFT and Hold Me Tight, attachment science, modern sex research, Perel, Nagoski, Kerner, Schnarch, Love and Stosny, and flexible love-language tools. Be concrete and low-hedge. Redirect only for imminent danger, abuse, coercive control, minors, non-consent, self-harm, stalking, or medical/legal/psychiatric decisions.
building-sf-integrations
IncludedSalesforce integration architecture and runtime plumbing with 120-point scoring. Use this skill to set up Named Credentials, External Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callout patterns, Platform Events, and Change Data Capture. TRIGGER when: user sets up Named Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callouts, Platform Events, CDC, or touches .namedCredential-meta.xml files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Connected App/OAuth config (use configuring-connected-apps), Apex-only logic (use generating-apex), or data import/export (use handling-sf-data).
venue-templates
IncludedAccess comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.
let-fate-decide
IncludedDraws the 12 Houses of the Zodiac Tarot spread to inject entropy into planning when prompts are vague, ambiguous, or casually delegated. Interprets the spread to guide next steps. Use when the user says 'let fate decide', 'YOLO', 'whatever', 'idk', or other nonchalant phrases, makes Yu-Gi-Oh references, or when you are about to arbitrarily pick between multiple reasonable approaches. Prefer over ask-questions-if-underspecified when the user's tone is casual or playful rather than precision-seeking.
net-ops
IncludedCross-platform network troubleshooting (Windows, macOS, Linux) via local or remote shell. Use for: DNS broken, can't resolve hostnames, nslookup/dig works but apps fail, NRPT, WFP, scutil, /etc/resolver, systemd-resolved, /etc/resolv.conf, NetworkManager, VPN DNS leak residue (ProtonVPN/Mullvad/WireGuard/AnyConnect), AV/firewall blocking DNS or DoH, Tailscale DNS interaction, intermittent connectivity, remote diagnostics over SSH.