legal-contract-negotiation-review
Analyze counterparty contract changes against agreement/schedules, flag conflicts, and produce severity-rated counterpositions.
What this skill does
# Legal Contract Negotiation Review ## Purpose Analyze counterparty contract changes against agreement/schedules, flag conflicts, and produce severity-rated counterpositions. ## Routing - Use when: Use for contract markups, last-minute deal term demands, or clause-by-clause negotiation defense work. - Do not use when: Do not use for pure legal research questions that do not require document comparison. - Outputs: Clause matrix, severity-ranked recommendations, counter-language, and a written negotiation brief. - Success criteria: Finds cross-document conflicts, produces actionable counterpositions, and writes the report artifact. ## Trigger Examples ### Positive - Use the legal-contract-negotiation-review skill for this request. - Help me with legal contract negotiation review. - Use for contract markups, last-minute deal term demands, or clause-by-clause negotiation defense work. - Legal Contract Negotiation Review: provide an actionable result. ### Negative - Do not use for pure legal research questions that do not require document comparison. - Do not use legal-contract-negotiation-review for unrelated requests. - This request is outside legal contract negotiation review scope. - This is conceptual discussion only; no tool workflow is needed. ## Parameters | Name | Type | Required | Description | |---|---|---|---| | agreement_path | string | No | Optional explicit path to the main agreement (DOCX/PDF/TXT) | | disclosure_schedules_path | string | No | Optional explicit path to disclosure schedules or side letter | | counterparty_changes_path | string | No | Optional explicit path to counterparty redline or demand letter | | client_side | select | No | Which side you represent | | output_report_path | string | No | Where to write the negotiation analysis markdown | | output_docx_path | string | No | Optional path for a clean revised DOCX draft | ## Runtime Prompt - Current runtime prompt length: 2482 characters. - Runtime prompt is defined directly in `../legal-contract-negotiation-review.json`.
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.