lindy-migration-deep-dive
Advanced migration strategies for moving to Lindy AI from other platforms. Use when migrating from Zapier, Make, n8n, custom automations, or consolidating fragmented agent systems. Trigger with phrases like "lindy migration", "migrate to lindy", "zapier to lindy", "switch to lindy", "consolidate automations".
What this skill does
# Lindy Migration Deep Dive ## Overview Migrate existing automation workflows from Zapier, Make (Integromat), n8n, LangChain, or custom code to Lindy AI. Key insight: Lindy replaces rigid rule-based automations with AI agents that can reason, adapt, and handle ambiguity — so migration is a redesign opportunity, not a 1:1 translation. ## Prerequisites - Inventory of existing automations (source platform) - Lindy workspace ready with required integrations authorized - Migration timeline approved - Rollback plan defined for customer-facing workflows ## Migration Source Comparison | Source Platform | Lindy Equivalent | Key Difference | |----------------|-----------------|----------------| | **Zapier Zap** | Lindy Agent | AI reasoning replaces rigid if/then | | **Make Scenario** | Lindy Agent | No-code builder instead of module chains | | **n8n Workflow** | Lindy Agent | Managed infra, no self-hosting | | **LangChain Agent** | Lindy Agent Step | No-code, managed, no Python needed | | **Custom code** | HTTP Request + Run Code | Less code, AI fills gaps | ## Instructions ### Step 1: Inventory Source Automations For each existing automation, document: | Field | Example | |-------|---------| | **Name** | Support Email Triage | | **Trigger** | New email in [email protected] | | **Steps** | 1. Parse email 2. Classify 3. Route to channel | | **Integrations** | Gmail, Slack, Sheets | | **Frequency** | ~50 runs/day | | **Complexity** | Medium (3 steps, 1 condition) | ### Step 2: Classify Migration Complexity | Complexity | Criteria | Migration Approach | Time | |-----------|---------|-------------------|------| | **Simple** | 1-3 steps, no conditions | Build from scratch in Lindy | 30 min | | **Medium** | 4-8 steps, conditions | Natural language description to Agent Builder | 1-2 hours | | **Complex** | 9+ steps, multi-branch, loops | Redesign as multi-agent society | 1-2 days | | **Custom code** | Python/JS logic | Run Code action + HTTP Request | 2-4 hours | ### Step 3: Migration Strategy by Source **From Zapier**: ``` Zapier Pattern → Lindy Pattern ──────────────────────────────── Trigger (New Email) → Trigger (Email Received) Filter Step → Trigger Filter (more efficient) Formatter → AI Prompt field mode (AI does formatting) Lookup → Knowledge Base search or HTTP Request Multi-step Zap → Single agent with conditions Paths → Conditions (natural language branching) ``` **From Make (Integromat)**: ``` Make Pattern → Lindy Pattern ──────────────────────────────── Scenario → Agent workflow Module → Action step Router → Conditions Iterator → Loop Aggregator → Run Code action (consolidation logic) Error Handler → Agent prompt error instructions ``` **From n8n**: ``` n8n Pattern → Lindy Pattern ──────────────────────────────── Trigger Node → Trigger Function Node → Run Code (Python/JS) HTTP Request Node → HTTP Request action IF Node → Condition Merge Node → Agent step (AI merges intelligently) ``` **From LangChain/Custom Code**: ``` LangChain Pattern → Lindy Pattern ──────────────────────────────── Agent → Agent Step with skills Tool → Action or HTTP Request Memory → Lindy Memory (persistent) Chain → Workflow steps Vector Store → Knowledge Base Retrieval Chain → Knowledge Base + AI Prompt ``` ### Step 4: Execute Migration (Phased) **Phase 1: Internal-Only Agents (Days 1-3)** 1. Migrate non-customer-facing automations first 2. Build in Lindy using natural language description 3. Test with real data for 48 hours 4. Compare output quality to source automation 5. Decommission source automation after verification **Phase 2: Low-Risk Customer-Facing (Days 4-7)** 1. Build Lindy agent alongside existing automation (parallel run) 2. Route 10% of traffic to Lindy agent 3. Compare results for 48 hours 4. Gradually increase to 50%, then 100% 5. Monitor task success rate and response quality **Phase 3: Critical Workflows (Days 8-14)** 1. Build Lindy agent as exact replacement 2. Test extensively with staging data 3. Schedule cutover during low-traffic window 4. Keep source automation pausable (not deleted) for 7 days 5. Monitor closely for 48 hours post-cutover ### Step 5: Redesign Opportunities Migration is a chance to improve, not just replicate: | Old Pattern | Lindy Improvement | |------------|-------------------| | Rigid if/then classification | AI classifies naturally, handles edge cases | | Template-based email responses | AI generates contextual, personalized responses | | Multiple automations for variations | Single agent with conditions handles all | | Manual data transformation | Run Code action or AI handles transformation | | No error handling | Agent prompt includes fallback behavior | ### Step 6: Validate and Cutover ```bash # Post-migration validation checklist echo "=== Migration Validation ===" # 1. Task completion rate echo "Check: Agent Tasks tab - expect >95% success rate" # 2. Response quality echo "Check: Compare 10 agent outputs to old automation outputs" # 3. Trigger coverage echo "Check: All events triggering correctly (no missed events)" # 4. Performance echo "Check: Task duration within acceptable range" # 5. Cost echo "Check: Credit consumption within budget" ``` ## Migration Checklist - [ ] Source system inventory complete - [ ] Each automation classified by complexity - [ ] Lindy integrations authorized - [ ] Phase 1 (internal) agents migrated and verified - [ ] Phase 2 (low-risk) agents running in parallel - [ ] Phase 3 (critical) agents tested with staging data - [ ] Cutover window scheduled - [ ] Rollback procedure tested - [ ] Source automations paused (not deleted) - [ ] 7-day post-cutover monitoring complete - [ ] Source automations decommissioned ## Error Handling | Issue | Cause | Solution | |-------|-------|----------| | Output quality lower | AI prompt needs tuning | Add few-shot examples to agent prompt | | Missing edge cases | Source had specific rules | Add condition branches or prompt instructions | | Higher cost than expected | Overuse of large models | Right-size models per step | | Integration auth fails | OAuth not set up in Lindy | Authorize integrations before migration | | Data format mismatch | Different field names | Map fields in Run Code action | ## Resources - [Lindy Templates](https://docs.lindy.ai/fundamentals/lindy-101/templates) - [Lindy Agent Builder](https://www.lindy.ai/blog/ai-agent-tutorial) - [Lindy Documentation](https://docs.lindy.ai) - [Lindy vs n8n](https://www.lindy.ai/blog/n8n-ai-agents) ## Next Steps This completes the Flagship tier. Review Standard and Pro skills for comprehensive Lindy mastery.
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.