lit-review-assistant
Search, summarize, and synthesize economics literature
What this skill does
# Literature Review Assistant
## Purpose
This skill helps economists conduct literature reviews by structuring searches, summarizing papers, and synthesizing findings. It provides templates for organizing literature and identifying research gaps.
## When to Use
- Starting a literature review for a new project
- Finding related work for a paper's introduction
- Synthesizing existing evidence on a topic
- Identifying gaps in the literature
## Instructions
### Step 1: Define the Research Domain
Ask the user:
1. What is your specific research question?
2. What's the scope? (Narrow field survey vs. cross-disciplinary review)
3. What databases do you have access to? (JSTOR, EconLit, Google Scholar, NBER)
4. What time period is relevant?
5. Are there seminal papers to start from?
### Step 2: Structure the Search
Help define search terms:
1. **Primary terms**: Core concepts (e.g., "minimum wage", "employment")
2. **Methodological filters**: (RCT, IV, difference-in-differences)
3. **Outcome terms**: What effects are measured
4. **Geographic/temporal scope**: If relevant
### Step 3: Organize and Synthesize
Create a structured summary for each paper:
- Citation
- Research question
- Data and methods
- Key findings
- Limitations
- How it relates to user's project
### Step 4: Identify Patterns and Gaps
- What do papers agree on?
- Where are disagreements?
- What questions remain unanswered?
- What methods haven't been applied?
## Example Output: Literature Summary Template
```markdown
# Literature Review: [TOPIC]
## Search Strategy
**Databases:** EconLit, NBER, Google Scholar, SSRN
**Date range:** 2010-2024
**Search terms:**
- ("minimum wage" OR "wage floor") AND (employment OR jobs)
- ("minimum wage") AND ("difference-in-differences" OR "DiD")
**Inclusion criteria:**
- Peer-reviewed or NBER working papers
- Focused on [specific outcome]
- Uses causal identification strategy
---
## Seminal Papers
### Card and Krueger (1994)
**Citation:** Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1994). Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. *American Economic Review*, 84(4), 772-793.
**Research Question:** What is the effect of minimum wage increases on employment?
**Data & Method:**
- DiD comparing NJ (treatment) to PA (control)
- Survey of fast-food restaurants before/after NJ minimum wage increase
**Key Findings:**
- No negative employment effect found
- Employment slightly increased in NJ relative to PA
**Contribution:** Challenged conventional view; pioneered quasi-experimental methods in labor economics
**Limitations:**
- Single state, short time horizon
- Potential survey response bias
---
### Cengiz et al. (2019)
**Citation:** Cengiz, D., Dube, A., Lindner, A., & Zipperer, B. (2019). The Effect of Minimum Wages on Low-Wage Jobs. *Quarterly Journal of Economics*, 134(3), 1405-1454.
**Research Question:** Do minimum wage increases destroy jobs or compress the wage distribution?
**Data & Method:**
- Bunching estimator using 138 minimum wage events
- Examine employment distribution around minimum wage
**Key Findings:**
- Jobs below the new minimum wage disappear
- But replaced by jobs just above the minimum
- No significant overall employment loss
**Contribution:** Novel bunching methodology; large-scale evidence
---
## Synthesis: What We Know
| Finding | Evidence Quality | Consensus Level |
|---------|-----------------|-----------------|
| Small minimum wage increases have minimal employment effects | Strong (multiple RCTs/quasi-experiments) | High |
| Effects may be heterogeneous by region | Medium | Growing |
| Large increases (e.g., $15) less studied | Limited | Low |
## Research Gaps
1. **Mechanism:** How do firms absorb higher labor costs? (Prices, profits, productivity?)
2. **Long-run effects:** Most studies focus on 1-2 years
3. **Geographic heterogeneity:** Do effects differ in low vs. high cost-of-living areas?
4. **Spillovers:** Effects on workers earning above minimum wage
## Connection to Your Project
Your study of [SPECIFIC QUESTION] can contribute by:
- [How your work fills a gap]
- [What new data/method you bring]
```
## Paper Summary Template
```markdown
## [Author(s)] ([Year])
**Title:** [Full title]
**Published in:** [Journal/Working Paper Series]
**Research Question:** [One sentence]
**Data:**
- Source: [Dataset name]
- Period: [Years]
- Sample: [N observations, unit of analysis]
**Identification Strategy:** [Method in one sentence]
**Main Findings:**
1. [Key result 1 with magnitude]
2. [Key result 2]
3. [Robustness/heterogeneity]
**Limitations:**
- [Main concern 1]
- [Main concern 2]
**Relevance to your project:** [One sentence on how it connects]
**Key quote:** "[Most important direct quote]" (p. XX)
```
## Search Strategy Tips
### Google Scholar Operators
- `"exact phrase"` - Exact matching
- `author:surname` - Papers by specific author
- `source:journal` - Papers in specific journal
- `-exclude` - Exclude terms
- `[year]..[year]` - Date range
### Finding Seminal Papers
1. Check citations in recent survey papers
2. Look for papers with 1000+ citations
3. Check JEL codes in EconLit
4. Review "related articles" in Google Scholar
### Building Citation Networks
1. Start with 2-3 seminal papers
2. Check what recent papers cite them (forward citations)
3. Check their references (backward citations)
4. Identify clusters of related work
## Best Practices
1. **Use reference managers** (Zotero, Mendeley, BibDesk)
2. **Create annotated bibliographies** as you read
3. **Track search queries** for reproducibility
4. **Update regularly** before submission
5. **Balance breadth and depth** - cover field but focus on closest work
## Common Pitfalls
- ❌ Only citing papers that support your argument
- ❌ Not engaging with contradictory findings
- ❌ Confusing correlation with causation when summarizing
- ❌ Citing papers you haven't actually read
- ❌ Missing important recent papers
## References
- [EconLit](https://www.aeaweb.org/econlit/) - Authoritative economics database
- [NBER Working Papers](https://www.nber.org/papers) - Latest research
- [IDEAS/RePEc](https://ideas.repec.org/) - Free economics papers
- [Connected Papers](https://www.connectedpapers.com/) - Visual citation networks
## Changelog
### v1.0.0
- Initial release with templates and search strategies
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.