literature-review
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).
What this skill does
# Literature Review
## Overview
Conduct systematic, comprehensive literature reviews following rigorous academic methodology. Search multiple literature databases, synthesize findings thematically, verify all citations for accuracy, and generate professional output documents in markdown and PDF formats.
This skill integrates with multiple scientific skills for database access (gget, bioservices, datacommons-client) and provides specialized tools for citation verification, result aggregation, and document generation.
## When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Conducting a systematic literature review for research or publication
- Synthesizing current knowledge on a specific topic across multiple sources
- Performing meta-analysis or scoping reviews
- Writing the literature review section of a research paper or thesis
- Investigating the state of the art in a research domain
- Identifying research gaps and future directions
- Requiring verified citations and professional formatting
## Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
**⚠️ MANDATORY: Every literature review MUST include at least 1-2 AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill.**
This is not optional. Literature reviews without visual elements are incomplete. Before finalizing any document:
1. Generate at minimum ONE schematic or diagram (e.g., PRISMA flow diagram for systematic reviews)
2. Prefer 2-3 figures for comprehensive reviews (search strategy flowchart, thematic synthesis diagram, conceptual framework)
**How to generate figures:**
- Use the **scientific-schematics** skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
**How to generate schematics:**
```bash
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
```
The AI will automatically:
- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
- Review and refine through multiple iterations
- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
- Save outputs in the figures/ directory
**When to add schematics:**
- PRISMA flow diagrams for systematic reviews
- Literature search strategy flowcharts
- Thematic synthesis diagrams
- Research gap visualization maps
- Citation network diagrams
- Conceptual framework illustrations
- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization
For detailed guidance on creating schematics, refer to the scientific-schematics skill documentation.
---
## Core Workflow
Literature reviews follow a structured, multi-phase workflow:
### Phase 1: Planning and Scoping
1. **Define Research Question**: Use PICO framework (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) for clinical/biomedical reviews
- Example: "What is the efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 (I) for treating sickle cell disease (P) compared to standard care (C)?"
2. **Establish Scope and Objectives**:
- Define clear, specific research questions
- Determine review type (narrative, systematic, scoping, meta-analysis)
- Set boundaries (time period, geographic scope, study types)
3. **Develop Search Strategy**:
- Identify 2-4 main concepts from research question
- List synonyms, abbreviations, and related terms for each concept
- Plan Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) to combine terms
- Select minimum 3 complementary databases
4. **Set Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria**:
- Date range (e.g., last 10 years: 2015-2024)
- Language (typically English, or specify multilingual)
- Publication types (peer-reviewed, preprints, reviews)
- Study designs (RCTs, observational, in vitro, etc.)
- Document all criteria clearly
### Phase 2: Systematic Literature Search
1. **Multi-Database Search**:
Select databases appropriate for the domain:
**Biomedical & Life Sciences:**
- Use `gget` skill: `gget search pubmed "search terms"` for PubMed/PMC
- Use `gget` skill: `gget search biorxiv "search terms"` for preprints
- Use `bioservices` skill for ChEMBL, KEGG, UniProt, etc.
**General Scientific Literature:**
- Search arXiv via direct API (preprints in physics, math, CS, q-bio)
- Search Semantic Scholar via API (200M+ papers, cross-disciplinary)
- Use Google Scholar for comprehensive coverage (manual or careful scraping)
**Specialized Databases:**
- Use `gget alphafold` for protein structures
- Use `gget cosmic` for cancer genomics
- Use `datacommons-client` for demographic/statistical data
- Use specialized databases as appropriate for the domain
2. **Document Search Parameters**:
```markdown
## Search Strategy
### Database: PubMed
- **Date searched**: 2024-10-25
- **Date range**: 2015-01-01 to 2024-10-25
- **Search string**:
```
("CRISPR"[Title] OR "Cas9"[Title])
AND ("sickle cell"[MeSH] OR "SCD"[Title/Abstract])
AND 2015:2024[Publication Date]
```
- **Results**: 247 articles
```
Repeat for each database searched.
3. **Export and Aggregate Results**:
- Export results in JSON format from each database
- Combine all results into a single file
- Use `scripts/search_databases.py` for post-processing:
```bash
python search_databases.py combined_results.json \
--deduplicate \
--format markdown \
--output aggregated_results.md
```
### Phase 3: Screening and Selection
1. **Deduplication**:
```bash
python search_databases.py results.json --deduplicate --output unique_results.json
```
- Removes duplicates by DOI (primary) or title (fallback)
- Document number of duplicates removed
2. **Title Screening**:
- Review all titles against inclusion/exclusion criteria
- Exclude obviously irrelevant studies
- Document number excluded at this stage
3. **Abstract Screening**:
- Read abstracts of remaining studies
- Apply inclusion/exclusion criteria rigorously
- Document reasons for exclusion
4. **Full-Text Screening**:
- Obtain full texts of remaining studies
- Conduct detailed review against all criteria
- Document specific reasons for exclusion
- Record final number of included studies
5. **Create PRISMA Flow Diagram**:
```
Initial search: n = X
├─ After deduplication: n = Y
├─ After title screening: n = Z
├─ After abstract screening: n = A
└─ Included in review: n = B
```
### Phase 4: Data Extraction and Quality Assessment
1. **Extract Key Data** from each included study:
- Study metadata (authors, year, journal, DOI)
- Study design and methods
- Sample size and population characteristics
- Key findings and results
- Limitations noted by authors
- Funding sources and conflicts of interest
2. **Assess Study Quality**:
- **For RCTs**: Use Cochrane Risk of Bias tool
- **For observational studies**: Use Newcastle-Ottawa Scale
- **For systematic reviews**: Use AMSTAR 2
- Rate each study: High, Moderate, Low, or Very Low quality
- Consider excluding very low-quality studies
3. **Organize by Themes**:
- Identify 3-5 major themes across studies
- Group studies by theme (studies may appear in multiple themes)
- Note patterns, consensus, and controversies
### Phase 5: Synthesis and Analysis
1. **Create Review Document** from template:
```bash
cp assets/review_template.md my_literature_review.md
```
2. **Write Thematic Synthesis** (NOT study-by-study summaries):
- Organize Results section by themes or research questions
- Synthesize findings across multiple studies within each theme
- Compare and contrast different approaches and results
- Identify consensus areas and points of controversy
- Highlight the strongest evidence
Example structure:
```markdown
#### 3.3.1 Theme: CRISPR Delivery Methods
Multiple delivery approaches have been investigated for therapeutic
gene editing. Viral vectors (AAV) were used in 15 studies^1-15^ and
showed highRelated in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.