ln-514-test-log-analyzer
Analyzes application logs: classifies errors, checks log quality, maps stack traces to source. Use when logs need review after test runs or during development.
What this skill does
> **Paths:** File paths (`references/`, `../ln-*`) are relative to this skill directory.
# Test Log Analyzer
**Type:** L3 Worker
**Category:** 5XX Quality
Two-layer analysis of application logs. Node.js script handles collection and quantitative analysis; AI handles classification, quality assessment, and fix recommendations.
## Inputs
No required inputs. Runs in current project directory, auto-detects log sources.
Optional `args` — caller instructions (natural language): time window, expected errors, test context. Example: `"review logs for last 30min, auth 401 errors expected from negative tests"`.
## Purpose & Scope
- Analyze application logs (after test runs, during development, or on demand)
- Classify errors into 4 categories: Real Bug, Test Artifact, Expected Behavior, Operational Warning
- Assess log quality: noisiness, completeness, level correctness, format, structured logging
- Map stack traces to source files; provide fix recommendations
- Report findings for quality verdict (only Real Bugs block)
- **No status changes or task creation** — report only
## When to Use
- Analyze application logs in any project (default: last 1h)
- After test runs to classify errors and assess log quality
- Can be invoked with context instructions: `Skill(skill: "ln-514-test-log-analyzer", args: "review last 30min, 401 errors expected")`
## Workflow
### Phase 0: Parse Instructions
If `args` provided — extract: time window (default: 1h), expected errors list, test context.
If no `args` — use defaults (last 1h, no expected errors).
### Phase 1: Log Source Detection and Script Execution
Read target project files if they exist: `docs/project/infrastructure.md`, `docs/project/runbook.md`
1) Check if `scripts/analyze_test_logs.mjs` exists in target project. If missing, copy from `references/scripts/analyze_test_logs.mjs`.
2) Detect log source mode (auto-detection priority: docker → file → loki):
| Mode | Detection | Source |
|------|-----------|--------|
| `docker` | `docker compose ps` returns running containers | `docker compose logs --since {window}` |
| `file` | `.log` files exist, or `tests/manual/results/` has output | File paths from infrastructure.md or `*.log` glob |
| `loki` | `LOKI_URL` env var or `environment_state.json` observability section | Loki HTTP query_range API |
3) Run script: `node scripts/analyze_test_logs.mjs --mode {detected} [options]`
4) If no log sources found → return `NO_LOG_SOURCES` status, skip to Phase 5.
**Level-based error detection (CRITICAL):**
When constructing Loki queries or grep commands to scan for errors, ALWAYS filter by the **parsed level field**, NOT by text matching the word "error" in the full log line. Logger names like `uvicorn.error` contain "error" as part of the name but log at INFO level — text matching produces false positives.
| Log format | Correct error filter | Wrong filter |
|------------|---------------------|--------------|
| Pipe-delimited (`ts \| LEVEL \| ...`) | `\| ERROR` or `\| CRITICAL` (match level field position) | `grep -i error` (matches logger names) |
| Loki structured | `{service_name="X"} \| level="ERROR"` or `\| pattern` extraction | `{service_name="X"} \|= "error"` |
| Key=value (`level=ERROR msg=...`) | `level=ERROR` or `level=FATAL` | `\|~ "(?i)error"` |
| Docker logs (local) | `grep -E '\| ERROR \| \| CRITICAL '` | `grep -iE 'error\|exception'` |
The `analyze_test_logs.mjs` script handles this correctly via structured regex parsers. These rules apply to **ad-hoc Loki/grep queries** constructed during analysis.
### Phase 2: 4-Category Error Classification
Classify each error group from script JSON output:
| Category | Action | Criteria |
|----------|--------|----------|
| **Real Bug** | Fix | Unexpected crash, data loss, broken pipeline |
| **Test Artifact** | Skip | From test scripts, deliberate error-path validation |
| **Expected Behavior** | Skip | Rate limiting, input validation, auth failures from invalid tokens |
| **Operational Warning** | Monitor | Clock drift, resource pressure, temporary unavailability |
**Test artifact detection heuristics:**
- Test name contains: `invalid`, `error`, `fail`, `reject`, `unauthorized`, `forbidden`, `not_found`, `bad_request`, `timeout`
- Test asserts non-2xx status codes (4xx, 5xx)
- Test uses `pytest.raises`, `expect(...).rejects`, `assertThrows`, `should.throw`
- Errors correlate with test execution timestamps from regression test output
- Patterns matching `tests/manual/` scripts
**Error taxonomy per** `references/error_taxonomy.md` **(9 categories: CRASH, TIMEOUT, AUTH, DB, NETWORK, VALIDATION, CONFIG, RESOURCE, UNSUPPORTED_API).**
### Phase 3: Log Quality Assessment
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/error_taxonomy.md` (per-level criteria table + level correctness reference)
**Step 1: Detect configured log level.** Check in order:
1. `LOG_LEVEL` / `LOGLEVEL` env var (`.env`, `docker-compose.yml`, `infrastructure.md`)
2. Framework config: Python `logging.conf` / Django `LOGGING` / Node `LOG_LEVEL`
3. Default: assume `INFO` if not detected
Configured level determines WHICH levels appear in logs, but each level has its own noise threshold regardless.
**Step 2: Assess 6 quality dimensions:**
| Dimension | What to Check | Signal |
|-----------|---------------|--------|
| **Noisiness** | Per-level noise thresholds from `error_taxonomy.md` section 4: TRACE (zero in prod), DEBUG (>50% monopoly), INFO (>30%), WARNING (>1% of total), ERROR (>0.1% of total) | `NOISY: {level} template "{msg}" at {ratio}%` |
| **Completeness & Traceability** | Critical operations missing log entries + traceability gaps (see table below) | `MISSING: No log for {operation}` / `TRACEABILITY_GAP: {type} in {file}:{line}` |
| **Level correctness** | Per-level criteria from `error_taxonomy.md` section 4: content, anti-patterns, library rule | `WRONG_LEVEL: should be {level}` |
| **Structured logging** | Missing trace_id/request_id/user context; unstructured plaintext | `UNSTRUCTURED: lacks {field}` |
| **Sensitivity** | PII/secrets/tokens/passwords in log messages | `SENSITIVE: {type} exposure` |
| **Context richness** | Errors without actionable context (order_id, user_id, operation) | `LOW_CONTEXT: lacks context` |
**Traceability gap detection** — scan source code for operations without INFO-level logging:
| Operation Type | Expected Log | Where to Add |
|---------------|-------------|--------------|
| Incoming request handling | Request received + response status | Entry/exit of route handler |
| External API call | Request sent + response status + duration | Before/after HTTP client call |
| DB write (INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE) | Operation + affected entity + count | Before/after ORM/query call |
| Auth decision | Result (allow/deny) + reason | After auth check |
| State transition | Old state → new state + trigger | At transition point |
| Background job | Start + complete/fail + duration | Entry/exit of job handler |
| File/resource operation | Open/close + path + size | At I/O operation |
**Log Format Quality** (10-criterion checklist per `references/log_analysis_output_format.md`):
| # | Criterion | Check |
|---|-----------|-------|
| 1 | Dual format | JSON in prod, readable in dev |
| 2 | Timestamp | Consistent, timezone-aware |
| 3 | Level field | Present, uppercase |
| 4 | Trace/Correlation ID | Present in every entry, async-safe |
| 5 | Service name | Identifies source service |
| 6 | Source location | module:line + function |
| 7 | Extra context | Structured fields, not string interpolation |
| 8 | PII redaction | Passwords, API keys, emails handled |
| 9 | Noise suppression | Duplicate filters, third-party suppressed |
| 10 | Parseability | Dev: pipe-delimited; prod: valid JSON per line |
Score: passed criteria / 10.
### Phase 4: Stack Trace Mapping + Fix Recommendations
For each Real Bug:
1) Extract stack trace frames; identify origin frame (first frame in project code, not in node_modules/site-packages)
2) Map to source Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.