ln-634-test-coverage-auditor
Identifies missing tests for unique critical local logic: money, auth, permissions, data integrity, algorithms, and domain rules. Use when auditing critical logic coverage gaps.
What this skill does
> **Paths:** File paths (`references/`, `../ln-*`) are relative to this skill directory.
# Critical Logic Coverage Auditor (L3 Worker)
**Type:** L3 Worker
Specialized worker identifying missing tests for unique critical local logic.
## Purpose & Scope
- Audit **Critical Logic Coverage** (Category 4: High Priority)
- Identify untested unique local logic only
- Classify by category (Money, Auth/Permissions, Data Integrity, Algorithms, Domain Rules)
- Emit `ADD_MISSING` findings for missing high-value tests
- Do not recommend tests just to increase coverage percentage
- Calculate compliance score (X/10)
## Inputs
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/audit_worker_core_contract.md`.
Tool policy: follow host AGENTS.md MCP preferences; load `references/mcp_tool_preferences.md` and `references/mcp_integration_patterns.md` only when host policy is absent or MCP behavior is unclear.
Receives `contextStore` with: `tech_stack`, `testFilesMetadata`, `codebase_root`, `output_dir`.
**Domain-aware:** Supports `domain_mode` + `current_domain` (see `audit_output_schema.md#domain-aware-worker-output`).
Use `hex-graph` first when hotspots materially improve coverage-gap discovery. Use `hex-line` first for local code and test reads when available. If MCP is unavailable, unsupported, or not indexed, continue with built-in `Read/Grep/Glob/Bash` and state the fallback in the report.
## Workflow
Detection policy: use two-layer detection (candidate scan, then context verification); load `references/two_layer_detection.md` only when the verification method is ambiguous.
1) **Parse context** -- extract fields, determine `scan_path` (domain-aware if specified)
ELSE:
scan_path = codebase_root
domain_name = null
```
2) **Identify critical local logic in scan_path** (not entire codebase)
- Scan production code in `scan_path` for money/auth/permission/data/algorithm/domain-rule keywords
- All Grep/Glob patterns use `scan_path` (not codebase_root)
- Example: `Grep(pattern="payment|refund|discount", path=scan_path)`
3) **Check test coverage for each critical path (Layer 1)**
- Search ALL test files for coverage (tests may be in different location than production code)
- Match by function name, module name, or test description
3b) **Context Analysis (Layer 2 -- MANDATORY):** For each gap candidate, ask:
- Is this function already covered by E2E/integration test? -> **downgrade to LOW**
- Is this a helper function with <10 lines called from tested code? -> **skip**
- Is keyword match a false positive (e.g., `paymentIcon()` is UI, not payment logic)? -> **skip**
4) **Collect missing tests**
- Tag each finding with `domain: domain_name` (if domain-aware)
- Set `action: "ADD_MISSING"` for every confirmed finding
5) **Calculate Score:** Count violations by severity, calculate compliance score (X/10)
6) **Write Report:** Build full markdown report in memory per `references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md`, write to `{output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.md` (or `{output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.md` if domain-aware) in single Write call
7) **Return Summary:** Return minimal summary to coordinator (see Output Format)
## Critical Local Logic Classification
### 1. Money Flows (Priority 20+)
**What:** Any code handling financial transactions
**Examples:**
- Payment processing (`/payment`, `processPayment()`)
- Discounts/promotions (`calculateDiscount()`, `applyPromoCode()`)
- Tax calculations (`calculateTax()`, `getTaxRate()`)
- Refunds (`processRefund()`, `/refund`)
- Invoices/billing (`generateInvoice()`, `createBill()`)
- Currency conversion (`convertCurrency()`)
**Min Priority:** 20
**Why Critical:** Money loss, fraud, legal compliance
### 2. Auth & Permissions (Priority 20+)
**What:** Local authentication, authorization, permission, and security decisions
**Examples:**
- Login/logout (`/login`, `authenticate()`)
- Token refresh (`/refresh-token`, `refreshAccessToken()`)
- Password reset (`/forgot-password`, `resetPassword()`)
- Permissions/RBAC (`checkPermission()`, `hasRole()`)
- Encryption/hashing (custom crypto orchestration or policy, NOT library behavior such as bcrypt/argon2)
- API key validation (`validateApiKey()`)
**Min Priority:** 20
**Why Critical:** Security breach, data leak, unauthorized access
### 3. Data Integrity (Priority 15+)
**What:** CRUD operations, transactions, validation
**Examples:**
- Critical CRUD (`createUser()`, `deleteOrder()`, `updateProduct()`)
- Database transactions (`withTransaction()`)
- Data validation (custom validators, NOT framework defaults)
- Data migrations (`runMigration()`)
- Unique constraints (`checkDuplicateEmail()`)
**Min Priority:** 15
**Why Critical:** Data corruption, lost data, inconsistent state
### 4. Algorithms & Domain Rules (Priority 15+)
**What:** Local calculations, branching rules, state transitions, and algorithms that encode project-specific behavior
**Examples:**
- Ranking/scoring algorithms
- Eligibility rules
- Domain state transitions
- Custom validation rules beyond framework defaults
- Import/export transformations
**Min Priority:** 15
**Why Critical:** Wrong product behavior, bad decisions, corrupted business state
## Audit Rules
### 1. Identify Critical Local Logic
**Process:**
- Scan codebase for money-related keywords: `payment`, `refund`, `discount`, `tax`, `price`, `currency`
- Scan for auth/permission keywords: `auth`, `login`, `password`, `token`, `permission`, `role`, `policy`
- Scan for data keywords: `transaction`, `validation`, `migration`, `constraint`
- Scan for algorithms/domain rules: `score`, `rank`, `eligibility`, `state`, `workflow`, `rule`
- Exclude framework defaults, generated behavior, and library primitives; `ln-631` owns product-vs-platform test focus for existing tests
### 2. Check Test Coverage
**For each critical path:**
- Search test files for matching test name/description
- If NO test found -> add to missing tests list
- If test found but inadequate (only positive, no edge cases) -> add to gaps list
### 3. Categorize Gaps
**Severity by Priority:**
- **CRITICAL:** Priority 20+ (Money, Security)
- **HIGH:** Priority 15-19 (Data, Core Flows)
- **MEDIUM:** Priority 10-14 (Important but not critical)
- **Downgrade when:** Function already covered by E2E test -> LOW. Helper with <10 lines called from tested code -> skip
### 4. Provide Justification
**For each missing test:**
- Explain WHY it's critical (money loss, security breach, etc.)
- Suggest test type (E2E, Integration, Unit)
- Set action to `ADD_MISSING`
- Estimate effort (S/M/L)
## Scoring Algorithm
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/audit_scoring.md`.
**Severity mapping by Priority:**
- Priority 20+ (Money, Security) missing test -> CRITICAL
- Priority 15-19 (Data Integrity, Core Flows) missing test -> HIGH
- Priority 10-14 (Important) missing test -> MEDIUM
- Priority <10 (Nice-to-have) -> LOW
## Output Format
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md`.
Write JSON summary per `references/audit_summary_contract.md`. In managed mode the caller passes both `runId` and `summaryArtifactPath`; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.
Write report to `{output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.md` (global) or `{output_dir}/ln-634--{identifier}.md` (domain-aware) with `category: "Critical Logic Coverage"` and checks: money_logic_coverage, auth_permission_coverage, data_integrity_coverage, algorithm_domain_rule_coverage.
Return summary per `references/audit_summary_contract.md`.
When `summaryArtifactPath` is absent, write the standalone runtime summary under `.hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/evaluation-worker/{worker}--{identifier}.json` and optionally echo the same summary in structured output.
```
Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/ln-634--{identifier}.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.