market-research
Use this skill when the user needs to size a market, analyze competitors, calculate TAM/SAM/SOM, or validate a business idea. Covers market sizing, competitive analysis frameworks, napkin math, and bottom-up revenue estimation.
What this skill does
# Market Research & Competitive Analysis Markets matter more than ideas. This skill helps you evaluate whether your market is worth entering — and how to validate demand before you build. ## Core Principles - A mediocre product in a great market beats a brilliant product in a dead one. - All market sizing is wrong. The goal is order-of-magnitude clarity, not decimal precision. - Competitors are evidence that demand exists. Zero competitors is a warning sign, not an advantage. - The best solo-founder markets have high pain, fragmented incumbents, and willingness to pay — not the biggest TAM. - Research is only useful if it changes a decision. Every analysis should end with a clear recommendation. --- ## Early Validation: Before You Build Anything ### Finding Your First 10 People to Talk To Before doing market sizing, validate that real people have this problem. **Method 1: Cold Outreach (Fastest — 1-2 weeks)** - LinkedIn: Search for your ICP's job title → send connection request with a note - Twitter/X: Search hashtags related to the problem → DM active posters - Reddit: Find niche subreddits → comment helpfully → DM engaged users - Email: Find company websites of target customers → reach out to founders/decision-makers **Cold outreach template:** ``` Subject: Quick question about [problem area] Hi [Name], I'm researching how [ICP role] handles [specific problem]. I noticed you [signal that they have this problem — e.g., posted about it, work in relevant role, use a competing tool]. Would you be open to a 15-minute call this week? I'm not selling anything — just trying to understand the problem better before I build a solution. Happy to share what I learn from the research as a thank you. [Your name] ``` **Method 2: Communities (Higher quality — 2-4 weeks)** - Indie Hackers: Search for threads where your ICP discusses the problem - Facebook Groups: Search for niche groups (e.g., "Freelance Copywriters", "SaaS Founders") - Slack communities: Industry-specific channels, FounderPath, etc. - Discord: More engaged than most channels for technical audiences **Method 3: Landing Page Test (Lowest effort — 2-3 weeks)** 1. Build a simple landing page describing the problem you solve (use Lovable or Claude Code) 2. Drive 100-200 visits via communities, social posts, or $100-200 in ads 3. Measure: Signups / Visitors = interest rate 4. Below 5% signup rate → positioning is unclear or demand is weak ### After 5 Conversations, Ask Yourself - Did 3+ people independently describe the same pain? → Demand likely real - Would they pay? Did anyone name a price unprompted? → Market likely exists - Do they already use 2+ workarounds? → Problem is acute - Did you learn something that surprised you? → Explore it in conversations 6-10 **Decision threshold:** - 3+ people confirm the problem AND 2+ say they'd pay → proceed to market sizing and build - Mixed signals after 10 conversations → either pivot your hypothesis or try a different ICP segment - Nobody cares after 10 conversations → this isn't a real problem. Pick a different idea. ### Avoiding Analysis Paralysis 5 conversations reveal 80% of what you need to know. The other 20% you learn by building and shipping. Don't wait for certainty — it never comes. --- ## Market Sizing (Napkin Math That Matters) **Tell AI:** ``` Help me size the market for my SaaS idea: - Product: [what it does] - Target customer: [who — job title, company size, industry] - Problem it solves: [the pain point] Do a bottom-up calculation: 1. Estimate how many potential buyers exist (use industry data, LinkedIn job title counts) 2. Multiply by a realistic price point for this type of tool 3. Apply a 1-3% capture rate for a new entrant 4. Tell me: does this math support a solo-founder business ($200K-500K ARR)? ``` ### Bottom-Up (The Only Method That Matters for Solo Founders) ``` 1. How many potential buyers exist? [Industry size] × [% that match your ICP] Example: 500,000 US marketing agencies × 12% that are 5-20 person = 60,000 2. What will each pay annually? [Price point] × [12 months] Example: $49/month × 12 = $588/year 3. Realistic addressable market: [Buyers] × [Annual price] × [Capture rate] Example: 60,000 × $588 × 2% = $705,600/year achievable 4. Sanity check: Does that number fund the business you want? Solo founder needs $200K-$500K ARR to replace income + reinvest. If max realistic capture is $100K, the market is too small. ``` ### Top-Down (Sanity Check Only) ``` TAM = Total market revenue (all possible buyers globally) SAM = Segment you can serve (geography, vertical, size) SOM = What you can realistically capture in 3 years Rule of thumb: SOM is 1-5% of SAM for a new entrant. If SOM doesn't fund your business, stop here. ``` ### Volume Estimation Sources - Government data: Census Bureau, BLS (industry counts) - Industry reports: IBISWorld, Statista (skim free summaries) - LinkedIn: Search ICP job titles → count results - Job boards: Volume of relevant roles = proxy for market size - Competitor traffic: SimilarWeb free tier → estimate active users - Subreddits/communities: Member counts = demand signal --- ## Competitive Analysis **Tell AI:** ``` Analyze the competitive landscape for my product: - My product: [what it does] - My target customer: [who] - Known competitors: [list any you know, or "not sure"] For each competitor, find: pricing, target audience, strengths, weaknesses (check G2/Capterra reviews for complaints). Then build a 2x2 positioning matrix showing where I could differentiate. ``` ### Substitute Mapping Every product competes with four types: 1. **Direct competitors** — Same solution, same audience (Basecamp vs. Asana) 2. **Indirect competitors** — Different solution, same problem (spreadsheets vs. project tool) 3. **DIY / manual process** — They do it by hand (Post-its, email threads) 4. **Do nothing** — They tolerate the pain (this is your real enemy) ### Competitor Research Template For each direct competitor: ``` ## [Competitor Name] **What they do**: One sentence. **Target audience**: Who they sell to. **Pricing**: Tiers and price points. **Strengths**: 2-3 things they do well. **Weaknesses**: 2-3 gaps, complaints, or underserved areas. **Positioning**: Homepage headline — how they describe themselves. **Traffic/Scale**: Monthly visits (SimilarWeb), review count (G2/Capterra). ### Where You Win What specific thing will you do 10x better? ``` ### Research Sources - **Pricing**: Visit their pricing page. Screenshot it. - **Positioning**: Read their homepage headline and subheadline. - **Weaknesses**: G2, Capterra, Product Hunt, Reddit threads, Twitter complaints. - **Traffic**: SimilarWeb (free tier). - **Features**: Their docs/changelog reveal what they've built and haven't. - **Hiring**: Job postings reveal strategic direction. ### Competitive Positioning Matrix Build a 2×2 matrix with the two dimensions your ICP cares most about: ``` Example axes: X: Simple ←————→ Powerful Y: Cheap ←————→ Premium Plot competitors on this grid. Find the empty quadrant. That's your positioning opportunity. ``` --- ## Solo-Founder Market Fit Assessment Score each criterion 1-5. Minimum viable total: 25/40. | Criterion | Score | Notes | |-----------|-------|-------| | **Pain intensity** — Hair-on-fire problem? | /5 | 5 = actively searching for a fix | | **Willingness to pay** — Already pay for substitutes? | /5 | 5 = pay $50+/mo for something worse | | **Reachable audience** — Can you find and contact them? | /5 | 5 = concentrated in known communities | | **Fragmented competition** — No dominant monopoly? | /5 | 5 = many small players, no clear winner | | **Small enough for solo** — Can one person serve this? | /5 | 5 = low support burden, self-serve viable | | **Recurring need** — Will they use it monthly? | /5 | 5 = daily/weekly active use | | **Your unfair advantage** — Domain expertise or distribution? | /5 | 5 = deep insider knowledge | | **Te
Related in General
modeling-omnistudio-epc-catalog
IncludedSalesforce Industries CME EPC product-modeling skill for Product2-based catalog creation. Use when creating EPC products, configuring product attributes, building offer bundles with Product Child Items, or reviewing EPC DataPack JSON metadata for product catalog changes. TRIGGER when: user creates or updates Product2 EPC records, AttributeAssignment payloads, AttributeMetadata/AttributeDefaultValues, Offer bundles, or ProductChildItem relationships. DO NOT TRIGGER when: designing OmniScripts/FlexCards/Integration Procedures (use building-omnistudio-omniscript, building-omnistudio-flexcard, or building-omnistudio-integration-procedure), implementing Apex business logic (use generating-apex), or troubleshooting deployment pipelines (use deploying-metadata).
relationship-science-coach
IncludedUse this skill for direct, practical adult relationship coaching: couples conflict, repair, trust, marriage, dating, flirting, attachment patterns, emotional connection, sex, desire differences, eroticism, kink negotiation, affection, love languages, breakups, and long-term passion. Draw on Gottman, EFT and Hold Me Tight, attachment science, modern sex research, Perel, Nagoski, Kerner, Schnarch, Love and Stosny, and flexible love-language tools. Be concrete and low-hedge. Redirect only for imminent danger, abuse, coercive control, minors, non-consent, self-harm, stalking, or medical/legal/psychiatric decisions.
building-sf-integrations
IncludedSalesforce integration architecture and runtime plumbing with 120-point scoring. Use this skill to set up Named Credentials, External Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callout patterns, Platform Events, and Change Data Capture. TRIGGER when: user sets up Named Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callouts, Platform Events, CDC, or touches .namedCredential-meta.xml files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Connected App/OAuth config (use configuring-connected-apps), Apex-only logic (use generating-apex), or data import/export (use handling-sf-data).
venue-templates
IncludedAccess comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.
let-fate-decide
IncludedDraws the 12 Houses of the Zodiac Tarot spread to inject entropy into planning when prompts are vague, ambiguous, or casually delegated. Interprets the spread to guide next steps. Use when the user says 'let fate decide', 'YOLO', 'whatever', 'idk', or other nonchalant phrases, makes Yu-Gi-Oh references, or when you are about to arbitrarily pick between multiple reasonable approaches. Prefer over ask-questions-if-underspecified when the user's tone is casual or playful rather than precision-seeking.
net-ops
IncludedCross-platform network troubleshooting (Windows, macOS, Linux) via local or remote shell. Use for: DNS broken, can't resolve hostnames, nslookup/dig works but apps fail, NRPT, WFP, scutil, /etc/resolver, systemd-resolved, /etc/resolv.conf, NetworkManager, VPN DNS leak residue (ProtonVPN/Mullvad/WireGuard/AnyConnect), AV/firewall blocking DNS or DoH, Tailscale DNS interaction, intermittent connectivity, remote diagnostics over SSH.