measure-experiment-results
Documents the results of a completed experiment or A/B test with statistical analysis, learnings, and recommendations. Use after experiments conclude to communicate findings, inform decisions, and build organizational knowledge.
What this skill does
<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 --> # Experiment Results An experiment results document captures what happened when you tested a hypothesis, including statistical outcomes, segment analysis, learnings, and clear recommendations. Good results documentation turns individual experiments into organizational knowledge that improves future decision-making. ## When to Use - After an A/B test or experiment reaches statistical significance - When an experiment is ended early (for any reason) - To communicate findings to stakeholders who weren't involved - During decision-making about whether to ship, iterate, or kill a feature - To build a repository of learnings that inform future experiments ## Instructions When asked to document experiment results, follow these steps: 1. **Summarize the Experiment** Provide context: what was tested, when it ran, how much traffic it received. Link to the original experiment design document if one exists. 2. **Restate the Hypothesis** Remind readers what you believed would happen and why. This frames the results interpretation. 3. **Present Primary Results** Show the primary metric outcome clearly: what were the values for control and treatment? Include statistical significance (p-value), confidence intervals, and sample sizes. Be honest about whether results are conclusive. 4. **Analyze Secondary Metrics** Present guardrail metrics that ensure you didn't cause unintended harm. Note any secondary metrics that moved unexpectedly.both positive and negative. 5. **Segment the Data** Look for differential effects across user segments (platform, tenure, plan type, etc.). Sometimes overall results mask important segment-level insights. 6. **Extract Learnings** What did you learn beyond the numbers? Include surprising findings, questions raised, and implications for the product hypothesis. Negative results are valuable learnings. 7. **Make a Recommendation** Be clear: should we ship, iterate, or kill? Support the recommendation with the evidence. If the decision is nuanced, explain the trade-offs. 8. **Define Next Steps** Specify what happens now.engineering work to ship, follow-up experiments, metrics to continue monitoring, or documentation to update. ## Output Format Use the template in `references/TEMPLATE.md` to structure the output. ## Quality Checklist Before finalizing, verify: - [ ] Statistical methods and significance are clearly stated - [ ] Confidence intervals are included (not just p-values) - [ ] Segment analysis checked for differential effects - [ ] Secondary/guardrail metrics are reported - [ ] Learnings go beyond just the numbers - [ ] Recommendation is clear and actionable - [ ] Negative or inconclusive results are reported honestly ## Examples See `references/EXAMPLE.md` for a completed example.
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.