n8n-validation-expert
Interpret validation errors and guide fixing them. Use when encountering validation errors, validation warnings, false positives, operator structure issues, or need help understanding validation results. Also use when asking about validation profiles, error types, the validation loop process, or auto-fix capabilities. Consult this skill whenever a validate_node or validate_workflow call returns errors or warnings — it knows which warnings are false positives and which errors need real fixes.
What this skill does
# n8n Validation Expert
Expert guide for interpreting and fixing n8n validation errors.
---
## Validation Philosophy
**Validate early, validate often**
Validation is typically iterative:
- Expect validation feedback loops
- Usually 2-3 validate → fix cycles
- Average: 23s thinking about errors, 58s fixing them
**Key insight**: Validation is an iterative process, not one-shot!
---
## Error Severity Levels
### 1. Errors (Must Fix)
**Blocks workflow execution** - Must be resolved before activation
**Types**:
- `missing_required` - Required field not provided
- `invalid_value` - Value doesn't match allowed options
- `type_mismatch` - Wrong data type (string instead of number)
- `invalid_reference` - Referenced node doesn't exist
- `invalid_expression` - Expression syntax error
**Example**:
```json
{
"type": "missing_required",
"property": "channel",
"message": "Channel name is required",
"fix": "Provide a channel name (lowercase, no spaces, 1-80 characters)"
}
```
### 2. Warnings (Should Fix)
**Doesn't block execution** - Workflow can be activated but may have issues
**Types**:
- `best_practice` - Recommended but not required
- `deprecated` - Using old API/feature
- `performance` - Potential performance issue
**Example**:
```json
{
"type": "best_practice",
"property": "errorHandling",
"message": "Slack API can have rate limits",
"suggestion": "Add onError: 'continueRegularOutput' with retryOnFail"
}
```
### 3. Suggestions (Optional)
**Nice to have** - Improvements that could enhance workflow
**Types**:
- `optimization` - Could be more efficient
- `alternative` - Better way to achieve same result
---
## The Validation Loop
### Pattern from Telemetry
**7,841 occurrences** of this pattern:
```
1. Configure node
↓
2. validate_node (23 seconds thinking about errors)
↓
3. Read error messages carefully
↓
4. Fix errors
↓
5. validate_node again (58 seconds fixing)
↓
6. Repeat until valid (usually 2-3 iterations)
```
### Example
```javascript
// Iteration 1
let config = {
resource: "channel",
operation: "create"
};
const result1 = validate_node({
nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
config,
profile: "runtime"
});
// → Error: Missing "name"
// ⏱️ 23 seconds thinking...
// Iteration 2
config.name = "general";
const result2 = validate_node({
nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
config,
profile: "runtime"
});
// → Error: Missing "text"
// ⏱️ 58 seconds fixing...
// Iteration 3
config.text = "Hello!";
const result3 = validate_node({
nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
config,
profile: "runtime"
});
// → Valid! ✅
```
**This is normal!** Don't be discouraged by multiple iterations.
---
## Validation Profiles
Choose the right profile for your stage:
### minimal
**Use when**: Quick checks during editing
**Validates**:
- Only required fields
- Basic structure
**Pros**: Fastest, most permissive
**Cons**: May miss issues
### runtime (RECOMMENDED)
**Use when**: Pre-deployment validation
**Validates**:
- Required fields
- Value types
- Allowed values
- Basic dependencies
**Pros**: Balanced, catches real errors
**Cons**: Some edge cases missed
**This is the recommended profile for most use cases**
### ai-friendly
**Use when**: AI-generated configurations
**Validates**:
- Same as runtime
- Reduces false positives
- More tolerant of minor issues
**Pros**: Less noisy for AI workflows
**Cons**: May allow some questionable configs
### strict
**Use when**: Production deployment, critical workflows
**Validates**:
- Everything
- Best practices
- Performance concerns
- Security issues
**Pros**: Maximum safety
**Cons**: Many warnings, some false positives
---
## Common Error Types
### 1. missing_required
**What it means**: A required field is not provided
**How to fix**:
1. Use `get_node` to see required fields
2. Add the missing field to your configuration
3. Provide an appropriate value
**Example**:
```javascript
// Error
{
"type": "missing_required",
"property": "channel",
"message": "Channel name is required"
}
// Fix
config.channel = "#general";
```
### 2. invalid_value
**What it means**: Value doesn't match allowed options
**How to fix**:
1. Check error message for allowed values
2. Use `get_node` to see options
3. Update to a valid value
**Example**:
```javascript
// Error
{
"type": "invalid_value",
"property": "operation",
"message": "Operation must be one of: post, update, delete",
"current": "send"
}
// Fix
config.operation = "post"; // Use valid operation
```
### 3. type_mismatch
**What it means**: Wrong data type for field
**How to fix**:
1. Check expected type in error message
2. Convert value to correct type
**Example**:
```javascript
// Error
{
"type": "type_mismatch",
"property": "limit",
"message": "Expected number, got string",
"current": "100"
}
// Fix
config.limit = 100; // Number, not string
```
### 4. invalid_expression
**What it means**: Expression syntax error
**How to fix**:
1. Use n8n Expression Syntax skill
2. Check for missing `{{}}` or typos
3. Verify node/field references
**Example**:
```javascript
// Error
{
"type": "invalid_expression",
"property": "text",
"message": "Invalid expression: $json.name",
"current": "$json.name"
}
// Fix
config.text = "={{$json.name}}"; // Add {{}}
```
### 5. invalid_reference
**What it means**: Referenced node doesn't exist
**How to fix**:
1. Check node name spelling
2. Verify node exists in workflow
3. Update reference to correct name
**Example**:
```javascript
// Error
{
"type": "invalid_reference",
"property": "expression",
"message": "Node 'HTTP Requets' does not exist",
"current": "={{$node['HTTP Requets'].json.data}}"
}
// Fix - correct typo
config.expression = "={{$node['HTTP Request'].json.data}}";
```
### 6. patchNodeField Errors
**What it means**: A `patchNodeField` operation failed during `n8n_update_partial_workflow`
The `patchNodeField` operation is strict by design — it errors instead of silently continuing when something is wrong. This catches mistakes early but means you need to handle these specific error cases.
**Error: Find string not found**
The patch's `find` value doesn't exist in the target field. This usually means the content was already changed, or the find string has a typo.
```
patchNodeField: find string not found in field "parameters.jsCode"
```
**How to fix**: Double-check the exact string. Use `n8n_get_workflow` to inspect the current field value. Whitespace and line endings matter — if unsure, use `regex: true` with `\s+` for flexible whitespace matching.
**Error: Ambiguous match (multiple occurrences)**
The find string appears more than once in the field. Without `replaceAll: true`, this is treated as ambiguous and rejected.
```
patchNodeField: find string matches 3 times in field "parameters.jsCode" — set replaceAll: true to replace all, or use a more specific find string
```
**How to fix**: Either set `replaceAll: true` if you want to replace all occurrences, or make your find string more specific to match only the intended location.
**Error: Invalid regex pattern**
When `regex: true`, the pattern is validated for correctness and safety.
```
patchNodeField: invalid or unsafe regex pattern
```
**How to fix**: Check regex syntax. Nested quantifiers like `(a+)+` and overlapping alternations like `(\w|\d)+` are rejected as ReDoS risks. Simplify the pattern.
---
## Auto-Sanitization System
### What It Does
**Automatically fixes common operator structure issues** on ANY workflow update
**Runs when**:
- `n8n_create_workflow`
- `n8n_update_partial_workflow`
- Any workflow save operation
### What It Fixes
#### 1. Binary Operators (Two Values)
**Operators**: equals, notEquals, contains, notContains, greaterThan, lessThan, startsWith, endsWith
**Fix**: Removes `singleValue` property (binary operators compare two values)
**Before**:
```javascript
{
"type": "boolean",
"operation": "equals",
"singleValue": true // ❌ Wrong!
}
```
**AfterRelated in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.