nelson
Orchestrates multi-agent task execution using a Royal Navy squadron metaphor — from mission planning through parallel work coordination to stand-down. Use when work needs parallel agent orchestration, tight task coordination with quality gates, structured delegation with progress checkpoints, or a documented decision log.
What this skill does
# Nelson
```!
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/nelson/scripts/nelson-data.py" status
```
Execute this workflow for the user's mission.
Write as Nelson's captains would write: concise, elegant, confident. Not eighteenth-century prose — the clear register of an officer who respects the reader's time. The skill's voice sets the example for the admiral's voice.
## 1. Issue Sailing Orders
- Review the user's brief for ambiguity. If the outcome, scope, or constraints are unclear, ask the user to clarify before drafting sailing orders.
- Write one sentence for `outcome`, `metric`, and `deadline`.
- Set constraints: token budget, reliability floor, compliance rules, and forbidden actions.
- Define what is out of scope.
- Define stop criteria and required handoff artifacts.
You MUST read `references/admiralty-templates/sailing-orders.md` and use the sailing-orders template when the user does not provide structure.
Example sailing orders summary:
```
Outcome: Refactor auth module to use JWT tokens
Metric: All 47 auth tests pass, no new dependencies
Deadline: This session
Constraints: Do not modify the public API surface
Out of scope: Migration script for existing sessions
```
**Establish Mission Directory:**
- **New session:** Run `nelson-data.py init` (see "Structured Data Capture" below). The script owns directory creation: it generates an 8-character hex SESSION_ID, creates `.nelson/missions/{YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS}_{SESSION_ID}/` with the `damage-reports/` and `turnover-briefs/` subdirectories, writes `sailing-orders.json`, `mission-log.json`, and `fleet-status.json`, writes `.nelson/.active-{SESSION_ID}` as the session marker, and prints the mission directory path to stdout. Capture that path as `{mission-dir}` for the remainder of this mission. The SESSION_ID is the segment after the last underscore in the directory name. If you need a specific SESSION_ID (e.g., testing or resuming a known id), pass `--session-id <8-hex>`.
- **Resumed session:** First, attempt auto-recovery by running `python3 .claude/skills/nelson/scripts/nelson-data.py recover --missions-dir .nelson/missions`. If this finds an active mission with handoff packets, use the structured recovery briefing to resume directly. Otherwise, if you know the SESSION_ID, read `.nelson/.active-{SESSION_ID}` to recover the mission path. Set that path as `{mission-dir}`. If you cannot determine your SESSION_ID (e.g., after a full restart), list `.nelson/missions/` and present the options to the user for selection. Set the chosen directory as `{mission-dir}`. Recover state per `references/damage-control/session-resumption.md` (prefer JSON files, fall back to quarterdeck report prose).
All mission artifacts — captain's log, quarterdeck reports, damage reports, and turnover briefs — are written inside `{mission-dir}`.
**Structured Data Capture:** Run the `nelson-data.py` script located in the skill's directory (e.g., `python3 .claude/skills/nelson/scripts/nelson-data.py init --outcome "..." --metric "..." --deadline "..."`). If installed globally, it may be in `~/.claude/skills/nelson/scripts/`. `init` creates the mission directory, the initial JSON files (`sailing-orders.json`, `mission-log.json`, `fleet-status.json` with initial phase `SAILING_ORDERS`), and the `.nelson/.active-{SESSION_ID}` marker in one atomic step. See `references/structured-data.md` for the full argument list.
**Phase Advance:** After structured data capture, advance the mission phase from SAILING_ORDERS to ESTIMATE:
```bash
python3 .claude/skills/nelson/scripts/nelson-phase.py advance --mission-dir {mission-dir}
```
**Session Hygiene:** Execute session hygiene per `references/damage-control/session-hygiene.md`. Skip this step when resuming an interrupted session.
**The Estimate opt-in:** Before proceeding, ask the user:
> *"Shall I carry out The Estimate before drafting the Battle Plan? I would recommend it for this mission — [brief reason]."*
Give an honest recommendation. For straightforward missions with clear scope in a single subsystem, proceed without the Estimate. For complex, ambiguous, or multi-system missions, recommend conducting it. If the user accepts, proceed to Step 2. If the user declines, record the decision and skip to Step 3:
```bash
python3 .claude/skills/nelson/scripts/nelson-data.py skip-estimate \
--mission-dir {mission-dir} --reason "[one-line rationale]"
python3 .claude/skills/nelson/scripts/nelson-phase.py advance --mission-dir {mission-dir}
python3 .claude/skills/nelson/scripts/nelson-phase.py advance --mission-dir {mission-dir}
```
The first `advance` moves from SAILING_ORDERS to ESTIMATE. The second `advance` moves from ESTIMATE to BATTLE_PLAN; the exit validator accepts the transition because `skip-estimate` has already recorded the opt-out in `sailing-orders.json`.
## 2. Conduct The Estimate
Read `references/the-estimate.md` for the full thought process, and use `references/admiralty-templates/estimate.md` as the scaffold. Work through seven questions that turn a mission brief into a plan worth executing:
1. **Reconnaissance** — What is the terrain? What are we working with?
2. **Intent** — What are we really trying to achieve, and why?
3. **Effects** — What changes must occur to fulfil the intent?
4. **Terrain** — Where in the codebase does each effect land?
5. **Forces** — What agents, models, and context do we need?
6. **Coordination** — What depends on what? What runs in parallel?
7. **Control** — Where are the quality gates and intervention points?
**Q1 dispatches Explore sub-agents.** Send one or more Explore agents into the codebase with a scouting brief derived from the Sailing Orders; synthesise their findings into the Reconnaissance section. Q1 must follow the Explorer discipline rules in `references/the-estimate.md` (multiple focused dispatches, structured summaries, no raw file contents).
**Q2–Q3 and Q4–Q7 are delegated in two separate sub-agent dispatches** so Q2–Q7 reasoning does not consume admiral context. The first dispatch (Estimate-Drafter) produces commander's intent and effects after Q1 and before Checkpoint 2; the second dispatch (Estimate-Planner) produces terrain, forces, coordination, and control after Checkpoint 2 approves intent and effects. Both subagents inherit the admiral's model; The Estimate phase is exempt from cost-savings model selection. See `references/the-estimate.md` for the briefing contents and dispatch templates.
**Two checkpoints bracket the analytical work.** After Q1, present findings to the user and invite correction or reframing. After Q3, present intent and effects for substantive approval before planning *how*. Q4-Q7 flow from approved effects and are the admiral's professional judgement — work through them without interrupting the user. Collapse both checkpoints into a single final review only when all three conditions hold: sailing orders specify outcome, metric, and deadline; Q1 reveals no surprises; the work lands in a single subsystem. See `references/the-estimate.md` for full checkpoint discipline.
Each effect in §3 must carry **commander's guidance** (how to do it) and **acceptance criteria** (what must be true when done). Criteria flow through to captains and are verified at stand-down; captains choose the verification method per criterion (test, type-check, lint, review, visual).
Write the estimate to `{mission-dir}/estimate.md` with one H2 section per question. Split to `{mission-dir}/estimate/0N-name.md` only when a section grows unwieldy.
**Phase Advance:** After the user approves the final estimate, advance from ESTIMATE to BATTLE_PLAN:
```bash
python3 .claude/skills/nelson/scripts/nelson-phase.py advance --mission-dir {mission-dir}
```
## 3. Draft Battle Plan
When The Estimate has been conducted, the Battle Plan inherits the analytical work: terrain, forces, coordination, and control are already decided. The Battle Plan step is operational — it turns approved effects into task assignments. When the EstiRelated in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.