newsletter-creation-curation
Industry-adaptive B2B newsletter creation with stage, role, and geography-aware workflows
What this skill does
# Newsletter Creation & Curation Skill
Use this skill to create B2B newsletters that match business context, not generic content templates.
Deep strategic guidance is in `PLAYBOOK.md`.
Use this file as the executable operating manual.
---
## Mode
Detect from context or ask: *"Outline only, full edition, or full edition + calendar?"*
| Mode | What you get | Best for |
|------|-------------|----------|
| `quick` | Edition outline + 3 lead story angles, no writing | Planning, editorial direction |
| `standard` | Full newsletter edition, all sections written | Publishing this week |
| `deep` | Full edition + 4-week content calendar + audience segmentation recommendations | Launching or systematizing a newsletter |
**Default: `standard`** — use `quick` if they're still deciding what to write. Use `deep` if they're building a newsletter from scratch or scaling.
---
## Context Loading Gates
**Before generating any newsletter content, collect:**
- [ ] **Company context:** What product/service? Who is the ICP?
- [ ] **Newsletter goal:** Lead gen / thought leadership / personal brand / category ownership
- [ ] **Industry vertical:** Sales Tech / HR Tech / Fintech / Operations Tech
- [ ] **Company stage:** Series A / Series B / Series C+
- [ ] **Role:** Founder / VP-Director / PMM-Content / Enterprise employee
- [ ] **Geography:** US-first / India-first
- [ ] **Prior issues:** Any existing issues to maintain consistency and voice?
- [ ] **Approval constraints:** Does this need legal/brand/manager review?
**Structured intake — answer all 5 dimensions before proceeding:**
```
Goal: [lead_gen | thought_leadership | personal_brand | category_ownership]
Industry: [sales_tech | hr_tech | fintech | ops_tech]
Stage: [series_a | series_b | series_c_plus]
Role: [founder | vp_director | pmm_content | enterprise_employee]
Geography: [us_first | india_first]
```
---
## Phase 1: Context Analysis
Before drafting, reason through:
1. **Template match:** Which industry template best fits? (Sales Tech = data-heavy; HR Tech = research-led; Fintech = compliance-aware; Ops Tech = practical)
2. **Cadence match:** Series A = weekly/bi-weekly for simplicity; Series B = weekly with process; Series C+ = media-grade weekly with pillars
3. **Role constraints:** Founder = direct POV allowed; Employee = approval checkpoint required before final draft
4. **Geography adjustments:** India-first = IST timing + local examples; US-first = EST/PST + US benchmarks
5. **Goal-content alignment:** Lead gen needs a clear conversion CTA; thought leadership needs original insight, not general content
Output one-line strategy statement:
> `For [ICP], we publish [cadence] to achieve [goal] with [format].`
---
## Phase 2: Issue Blueprint
Before writing full draft, produce an issue blueprint:
```markdown
## Issue Blueprint
**Strategy:** For [ICP], [cadence] to achieve [goal].
**Industry tone:** [tactical/research-led/compliance-aware/practical]
**Approval required:** [yes/no — who]
**Sections:**
1. Subject lines (3 options) — [~words each]
2. Hook — [target ~75 words]
3. Core insight — [target ~200 words]
4. Actionable playbook — [target ~150 words, 3-5 steps]
5. CTA — [1 sentence, singular action]
```
Get confirmation or proceed to draft.
---
## Phase 3: Full Issue Draft
Generate complete publish-ready draft. Required structure — every issue:
### Subject Line Options (3 required)
Produce 3 distinct angles:
- A: Curiosity/open loop ("The metric most [ICP] ignore")
- B: Specific + benefit ("How [Company type] achieves [X] in [timeframe]")
- C: Contrarian/bold ("Stop [common behavior]. Do this instead.")
### Hook
- First 2 sentences must earn the read
- Lead with the problem + stakes
- Target: busy reader can extract the point in 60 seconds
### Core Insight
- One primary takeaway per issue — not three
- Support with: data, framework, or named pattern
- Include specific numbers or named examples wherever possible
### Actionable Playbook
- 3-5 steps or checklist items
- Each step must be implementable, not just conceptual
- Series A = simpler steps; Series C+ = more sophisticated process
### CTA
- ONE measurable action only
- Options: reply with [X], click [link], share [asset], book [demo]
- Never use vague CTAs ("Learn more")
---
## Phase 4: Refinement Checklist
Run before delivering:
- [ ] `Clarity`: Can a busy reader extract value in 60 seconds?
- [ ] `Specificity`: Does each section include concrete guidance or evidence?
- [ ] `Relevance`: Does tone match industry and role constraints?
- [ ] `Compliance`: For fintech/employee-led, is a legal/manager review step included?
- [ ] `Consistency`: Does voice align with prior issues (if any were provided)?
- [ ] `CTA`: Is there exactly ONE measurable CTA — not two, not zero?
---
## Phase 5: Self-Critique Pass (REQUIRED)
After completing the draft, evaluate:
- [ ] Does the subject line A option create genuine curiosity without being clickbait?
- [ ] Does the hook deliver a problem + stakes in the first 2 sentences?
- [ ] Is the core insight something subscribers couldn't get from a generic AI prompt?
- [ ] Does the playbook have steps that are specific to this audience, not generic "tips"?
- [ ] Is the CTA actually measurable — i.e., can they track whether it worked?
- [ ] For fintech/employee contexts: is there an explicit approval checkpoint?
Flag any issue: "The playbook steps are too generic for a Series B SaaS audience — they read as beginner content. Revised to assume existing process maturity."
---
## Iteration Protocol
After delivering the draft:
1. Ask: "Does the hook earn the read? Does the playbook feel actionable for your audience?"
2. If hook is weak → rewrite using a different angle (data-led, story-led, or contrarian)
3. If playbook is too generic → ask for a specific example from their own experience to ground it
4. For next issue: "Want me to save these content themes so the next issue builds on this one?"
---
## Output Structure
```markdown
## Newsletter Issue: [Name] — Issue #[X] — [Date]
**Strategy:** For [ICP], [cadence] to achieve [goal].
---
### Subject Line Options
A) [Curiosity/open loop]
B) [Specific + benefit]
C) [Contrarian/bold]
**Recommended:** [A/B/C] — [reason]
---
### Hook
[2-3 sentences — problem + stakes]
---
### Core Insight
[200-300 words — data, framework, or named pattern]
---
### Actionable Playbook
1. [Step]
2. [Step]
3. [Step]
---
### CTA
[Single measurable action]
---
### Distribution Plan
- **Send time:** [Day, Time, Timezone]
- **LinkedIn amplification:** [Post angle / hook]
- **Secondary channel:** [Platform + angle]
### KPI Targets
- Open rate goal: [%]
- CTR goal: [%]
- Primary metric: [SQLs / subscribers / replies]
### Approval Required
[Yes — [who] | No]
### Self-Critique Notes
[Issues flagged + revisions made]
```
---
## Playbook Map (Deep Dives in `PLAYBOOK.md`)
- Sales Tech strategy: `SECTION A`
- HR Tech strategy: `SECTION B`
- Fintech strategy: `SECTION C`
- Operations Tech strategy: `SECTION D`
- Role approvals and geography tactics: `CROSS-CUTTING: UNIVERSAL FRAMEWORKS`
---
*Skill by Brian Wagner | AI Marketing Architect | brianrwagner.com*
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.