nocobase-data-analysis
Query and analyze business data in NocoBase via MCP. Use when users want current counts, grouped breakdowns, owner/source distributions, or business summaries across collections, with main data source first and fallback discovery to other enabled data sources.
What this skill does
# Goal
Use NocoBase MCP tools to locate the right collection, query business data safely, and produce reliable summaries or grouped analysis.
# Prerequisite
- NocoBase MCP must already be reachable and authenticated.
- If MCP returns authentication errors such as `Auth required`, stop and ask the user to refresh MCP authentication before continuing.
# Default strategy
1. Inspect the data source path first.
2. Prefer the `main` data source.
3. If the target collection is not in `main`, inspect other enabled data sources.
4. Once the collection is located, use that `dataSource` explicitly in every subsequent `resource_*` call.
5. Prefer `resource_query` for counts and grouped analysis only after confirming the query parameter contract.
6. Fall back to `resource_list` plus manual counting when query results are suspicious or need cross-checking.
Useful references:
- `references/analysis-patterns.md` for common business analysis shapes
- `references/metric-checklist.md` for metric definition and scope checks
- `references/entity-mapping.md` for mapping business terms to collections and fields
# Data source discovery
- If the user explicitly names a data source, use it directly.
- Otherwise start with `main`.
- When the target collection is not found in `main`, call `data_sources:list_enabled` and inspect other enabled data sources one by one.
- If multiple data sources contain the same collection name:
- default to `main` when `main` is one of them;
- otherwise present the candidates and explain which one you are using.
- In the final answer, state which data source was used.
# Collection discovery
- If the user gives a collection name, verify it exists before querying.
- If the user uses business terms such as "leads", "users", "orders", or "opportunities", inspect collection metadata to map the business term to the actual collection name.
- Prefer `collections:listMeta` for a fast overview.
- Then use `collections:get` with `appends: ["fields"]` when you need exact field names, relation targets, or enum options.
- Use `references/entity-mapping.md` as a reusable heuristic for common business nouns and likely field categories.
# Query contract checks
Before using `resource_query`, verify the request shape matches the real backend contract:
- `measures[].aggregation`, not `aggregate`
- `orders[].order`, not `direction`
- `field` should usually be passed as a field path array such as `["id"]` or `["owner", "nickname"]`
- Use `alias` whenever the result will be referenced in output or `having`
Correct examples:
```json
{
"resource": "lead",
"dataSource": "main",
"measures": [
{ "aggregation": "count", "field": ["id"], "alias": "lead_count" }
]
}
```
```json
{
"resource": "lead",
"dataSource": "main",
"dimensions": [
{ "field": ["status"], "alias": "status" }
],
"measures": [
{ "aggregation": "count", "field": ["id"], "alias": "lead_count" }
],
"orders": [
{ "field": ["status"], "alias": "status", "order": "asc" }
]
}
```
# Recommended workflow
## 1. Confirm reachability
- Use `auth:check`.
- If authentication fails, stop.
## 2. Find the collection
- First inspect `main`.
- If not found, inspect other enabled data sources.
- Read fields before querying if field names or relations are uncertain.
## 3. Start with simple counts
- Use `resource_query` with a single `count(id)` measure.
- Keep the first query minimal so you can validate the result shape quickly.
## 4. Add grouped analysis
Common grouped views:
- by status
- by owner
- by source
- by department
- by created date or month
For relation labels, use field paths such as:
- `["owner", "nickname"]`
- `["mainDepartment", "title"]`
## 5. Cross-check when needed
Re-check with `resource_list` when:
- the grouped rows look duplicated unexpectedly;
- the numeric result looks like record IDs instead of counts;
- totals do not match between summary and grouped output;
- the collection may be affected by ACL scope or hidden filters.
When cross-checking:
- fetch enough rows to cover the visible dataset or use pagination;
- count and group manually from the returned records;
- compare the manual result with `resource_query`.
## 6. Present the result
Report:
- the collection used;
- the data source used;
- the total count;
- the key grouped breakdowns;
- any caveat such as ACL scope, null values, or fallback to manual verification.
# Analysis entry points
Classify the user request before querying:
- `overview` for current totals and main distributions
- `distribution` for grouped counts by status, owner, source, team, or department
- `funnel` for stage-based business progression
- `trend` for date or month-based change over time
- `ranking` for top owners, sources, accounts, or products
- `quality-check` for missing values, null-heavy fields, suspicious statuses, or orphaned relations
Use `references/analysis-patterns.md` for the recommended query shapes for each pattern.
# Metric definition checks
Before returning an answer, verify the metric scope:
- what time range is included
- which time field drives the range
- whether the metric is total count, distinct count, sum, or average
- whether archived, inactive, null, or other terminal states should be included
- whether grouped totals reconcile with the grand total
Use `references/metric-checklist.md` when the user request is ambiguous or the metric may be interpreted in more than one way.
# Common pitfalls
- Do not assume the collection is in `main`; check `main` first, then search other enabled data sources.
- Do not omit `dataSource` after the collection has been located.
- Do not use `aggregate` in query measures; the backend expects `aggregation`.
- Do not use `direction` in query orders; the backend expects `order`.
- Do not assume suspicious aggregate output is correct.
- If a "count" result looks like `36`, `54`, `80`, or another plausible record ID, verify whether aggregation was actually applied.
- Relation label grouping requires the real relation path and target field, not guessed labels.
# Verification checklist
- MCP is authenticated.
- The collection exists in the chosen data source.
- The fields used in `dimensions`, `measures`, `orders`, and `filter` actually exist.
- `resource_query` uses `aggregation` and `order`.
- Summary totals match grouped totals, or any mismatch is explained.
- The final answer states the data source and any verification fallback used.
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.