openspec-proposal-creation
Creates structured change proposals with specification deltas for new features, breaking changes, or architecture updates. Use when planning features, creating proposals, speccing changes, introducing new capabilities, or starting development workflows. Triggers include "openspec proposal", "create proposal", "plan change", "spec feature", "new capability", "add feature planning", "design spec".
What this skill does
# Specification Proposal Creation
Creates comprehensive change proposals following spec-driven development methodology.
## Quick Start
Creating a spec proposal involves three main outputs:
1. **proposal.md** - Why, what, and impact summary
2. **tasks.md** - Numbered implementation checklist
3. **spec-delta.md** - Formal requirement changes (ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED)
**Basic workflow**: Generate change ID → scaffold directories → draft proposal → create spec deltas → validate structure
## Workflow
Copy this checklist and track progress:
```
Proposal Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Review existing specifications
- [ ] Step 2: Generate unique change ID
- [ ] Step 3: Scaffold directory structure
- [ ] Step 4: Draft proposal.md (Why/What/Impact)
- [ ] Step 5: Create tasks.md implementation checklist
- [ ] Step 6: Write spec deltas with EARS format
- [ ] Step 7: Validate proposal structure
- [ ] Step 8: Present for user approval
```
### Step 1: Review existing specifications
Before creating a proposal, understand the current state:
```bash
# List all existing specs
find spec/specs -name "spec.md" -type f
# List active changes to avoid conflicts
find spec/changes -maxdepth 1 -type d -not -path "*/archive"
# Search for related requirements
grep -r "### Requirement:" spec/specs/
```
### Step 2: Generate unique change ID
Choose a descriptive, URL-safe identifier:
**Format**: `add-<feature>`, `fix-<issue>`, `update-<component>`, `remove-<feature>`
**Examples**:
- `add-user-authentication`
- `fix-payment-validation`
- `update-api-rate-limits`
- `remove-legacy-endpoints`
**Validation**: Check for conflicts:
```bash
ls spec/changes/ | grep -i "<proposed-id>"
```
### Step 3: Scaffold directory structure
Create the change folder with standard structure:
```bash
# Replace {change-id} with actual ID
mkdir -p spec/changes/{change-id}/specs/{capability-name}
```
**Example**:
```bash
mkdir -p spec/changes/add-user-auth/specs/authentication
```
### Step 4: Draft proposal.md
Use the template at [templates/proposal.md](templates/proposal.md) as starting point.
**Required sections**:
- **Why**: Problem or opportunity driving this change
- **What Changes**: Bullet list of modifications
- **Impact**: Affected specs, code, APIs, users
**Tone**: Clear, concise, decision-focused. Avoid unnecessary background.
### Step 5: Create tasks.md implementation checklist
Break implementation into concrete, testable tasks. Use the template at [templates/tasks.md](templates/tasks.md).
**Format**:
```markdown
# Implementation Tasks
1. [First concrete task]
2. [Second concrete task]
3. [Test task]
4. [Documentation task]
```
**Best practices**:
- Each task is independently completable
- Include testing and validation tasks
- Order by dependencies (database before API, etc.)
- 5-15 tasks is typical; split if more needed
### Step 6: Write spec deltas with EARS format
This is the most critical step. Spec deltas use **EARS format** (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax).
**For complete EARS guidelines**, see [reference/EARS_FORMAT.md](reference/EARS_FORMAT.md)
**Delta operations**:
- `## ADDED Requirements` - New capabilities
- `## MODIFIED Requirements` - Changed behavior (include full updated text)
- `## REMOVED Requirements` - Deprecated features
**Basic requirement structure**:
```markdown
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: User Login
WHEN a user submits valid credentials,
the system SHALL authenticate the user and create a session.
#### Scenario: Successful Login
GIVEN a user with email "[email protected]" and password "correct123"
WHEN the user submits the login form
THEN the system creates an authenticated session
AND redirects to the dashboard
```
**For validation patterns**, see [reference/VALIDATION_PATTERNS.md](reference/VALIDATION_PATTERNS.md)
### Step 7: Validate proposal structure
Run these checks before presenting to user:
```markdown
Structure Checklist:
- [ ] Directory exists: `spec/changes/{change-id}/`
- [ ] proposal.md has Why/What/Impact sections
- [ ] tasks.md has numbered task list (5-15 items)
- [ ] Spec deltas have operation headers (ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED)
- [ ] Requirements follow `### Requirement: <name>` format
- [ ] Scenarios use `#### Scenario:` format (4 hashtags)
```
**Automated checks**:
```bash
# Count delta operations (should be > 0)
grep -c "## ADDED\|MODIFIED\|REMOVED" spec/changes/{change-id}/specs/**/*.md
# Verify scenario format (should show line numbers)
grep -n "#### Scenario:" spec/changes/{change-id}/specs/**/*.md
# Check requirement headers
grep -n "### Requirement:" spec/changes/{change-id}/specs/**/*.md
```
### Step 8: Present for user approval
Summarize the proposal clearly:
```markdown
## Proposal Summary
**Change ID**: {change-id}
**Scope**: {brief description}
**Files created**:
- spec/changes/{change-id}/proposal.md
- spec/changes/{change-id}/tasks.md
- spec/changes/{change-id}/specs/{capability}/spec-delta.md
**Next steps**:
Review the proposal. If approved, say "openspec implement" or "apply the change" to begin implementation.
```
## Advanced Topics
**EARS format details**: See [reference/EARS_FORMAT.md](reference/EARS_FORMAT.md)
**Validation patterns**: See [reference/VALIDATION_PATTERNS.md](reference/VALIDATION_PATTERNS.md)
**Complete examples**: See [reference/EXAMPLES.md](reference/EXAMPLES.md)
## Common Patterns
### Pattern 1: New feature proposal
When adding net-new capability:
- Use `ADDED Requirements` delta
- Include positive scenarios AND error handling
- Consider edge cases in scenarios
### Pattern 2: Breaking change proposal
When changing existing behavior:
- Use `MODIFIED Requirements` delta
- Include complete updated requirement text
- Document what changes and why in proposal.md
- Consider migration tasks in tasks.md
### Pattern 3: Deprecation proposal
When removing features:
- Use `REMOVED Requirements` delta
- Document removal rationale in proposal.md
- Include cleanup tasks in tasks.md
- Consider user migration in impact section
## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
**Don't**:
- Skip validation checks (always run grep patterns)
- Create proposals without reviewing existing specs first
- Use vague task descriptions ("Fix the thing")
- Write requirements without scenarios
- Forget error handling scenarios
- Mix multiple unrelated changes in one proposal
**Do**:
- Check for conflicts before creating change ID
- Write concrete, testable tasks
- Include positive AND negative scenarios
- Keep one concern per proposal
- Validate structure before presenting
## File Templates
All templates are in the `templates/` directory:
- [proposal.md](templates/proposal.md) - Proposal structure
- [tasks.md](templates/tasks.md) - Task checklist format
- [spec-delta.md](templates/spec-delta.md) - Spec delta template
## Reference Materials
- [EARS_FORMAT.md](reference/EARS_FORMAT.md) - Complete EARS syntax guide
- [VALIDATION_PATTERNS.md](reference/VALIDATION_PATTERNS.md) - Grep/bash validation
- [EXAMPLES.md](reference/EXAMPLES.md) - Real-world proposal examples
---
**Token budget**: This SKILL.md is approximately 450 lines, under the 500-line recommended limit. Reference files load only when needed for progressive disclosure.
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.