parametrize-and-cite
Transform any data, document, deck, README, manifest, config, or report by (1) extracting every piece of dynamic information — names, links, statistics, costs, identifiers, dates, thresholds — into configurable variables instead of hard-coding, and (2) enforcing that every factual assertion carries at least two independent citations. Triggers on "remove branding," "make this reusable," "transmute this," "parametrize," "no hard-coded values," "configurable," "needs citations," "verify these claims," or any request to convert a one-off artifact into a parameterized template.
What this skill does
# Parametrize and Cite
Two universal mandates apply to any data or compilation thereof:
1. **All dynamic information is a configurable environment variable.** Names, links, statistics, costs, identifiers, dates, thresholds, contact details — never hard-coded. The structure is reusable; the particulars are injected.
2. **All assertions require multiple citations.** Every factual claim carries at least two independent sources. Single-source claims are flagged, not shipped.
These are not stylistic preferences. They are substrate disciplines that determine whether an artifact survives time (parametrization protects against drift; multi-citation protects against epistemic collapse).
## When this skill fires
Apply this skill whenever the input is a "compiled artifact" — anything that bundles structure with particulars:
- pitch decks, one-pagers, sales sheets, README files
- competitive analyses, market reports, research summaries
- configuration files, manifests, deployment templates
- onboarding docs, runbooks, SOPs, playbooks
- any document that mixes "the pattern" with "this specific instance"
- any document that makes claims (numbers, attributions, characterizations)
If the artifact has a brand-shaped surface AND reusable bones, this skill fires. If it makes assertions, this skill fires.
## The transformation pipeline
Run the artifact through five phases in order. Don't skip phases — each one catches a different class of issue.
### Phase 1: Audit
Read the artifact end-to-end before transforming anything. Build two inventories:
- **Dynamic-information inventory**: every concrete particular (see the taxonomy below).
- **Assertion inventory**: every factual claim, with its current citation count.
Note: an "assertion" is anything stated as fact that the reader is expected to believe. Opinions and recommendations are not assertions. Numbers, attributions, comparisons, and historical claims are.
### Phase 2: Identify dynamics
Categorize each particular by what makes it dynamic. Use this taxonomy:
| Category | Examples | Env var prefix |
|---|---|---|
| Identity | company name, person name, project name, brand | `IDENTITY_*` |
| Locator | URL, repo path, email, phone, address | `LINK_*` / `CONTACT_*` |
| Quantitative | revenue, count, percentage, ratio, score | `STAT_*` |
| Monetary | price, cost, budget, fee, salary | `COST_*` |
| Temporal | date, deadline, duration, period | `DATE_*` / `DURATION_*` |
| Threshold | limit, quota, target, SLA | `THRESHOLD_*` |
| Credential | API key, token, account ID | `SECRET_*` (never default) |
| Categorical | tier, plan, region, jurisdiction | `CATEGORY_*` |
Anything that *could* differ between instances of this artifact's reuse is dynamic, even if it feels permanent today. "Our company name" is dynamic — the artifact might be reused by an acquirer, a fork, a parallel project, or a customer-facing variant.
### Phase 3: Parametrize
Replace each dynamic particular with an env-var reference. Choose a template syntax that matches the artifact's medium:
- **Markdown / prose docs**: `{{ IDENTITY_COMPANY_NAME }}` (Mustache-style) or `${IDENTITY_COMPANY_NAME}` (shell-style)
- **YAML / JSON configs**: `${IDENTITY_COMPANY_NAME}` (envsubst-style) or platform-native (`!Ref`, `${{ vars.X }}`, etc.)
- **Code files**: language-idiomatic (`os.environ["IDENTITY_COMPANY_NAME"]`, `process.env.IDENTITY_COMPANY_NAME`)
Generate a paired `.env.example` (or platform-equivalent: `config.example.yaml`, `terraform.tfvars.example`, etc.) with every variable, a one-line comment describing what it controls, and a sample value drawn from the original artifact.
```
# Identity
IDENTITY_COMPANY_NAME="Example Corp" # Replaces brand references in headers, footers
IDENTITY_PRODUCT_NAME="ExampleProduct" # Used in feature descriptions
# Stats — quarterly report figures
STAT_Q4_REVENUE_USD=4200000 # Q4 top-line revenue
STAT_Q4_GROWTH_PCT=23 # YoY growth percentage
# Costs — pricing tier defaults
COST_TIER_STARTER_USD_MONTH=49 # Starter plan monthly price
```
**Never inline secrets even as examples.** For `SECRET_*` variables, the example file shows the variable name and a placeholder (`SECRET_API_KEY=changeme-in-production`), never a real key.
### Phase 4: Cite
For every assertion in the inventory, attach at least two independent citations. Define independence carefully:
- **Two sources from the same parent org are not independent.** A company's own homepage + its own blog = one source.
- **A primary source + a secondary that reports on the primary is not two independent sources.** That's one source plus its echo.
- **Two independent sources** = two organizations with no editorial or financial relationship, each having direct access to the underlying evidence (or each citing a distinct primary).
Citation format depends on the medium:
- **Prose docs**: inline footnotes `[^1]` + bibliography section
- **Slides / decks**: source line at bottom of slide, full sources in appendix
- **Data tables**: per-row source column + per-column source notes
- **Code comments**: `# Source: <url> (accessed YYYY-MM-DD); cross-checked: <url>`
Where you cannot find two independent citations, do one of the following — explicitly, never silently:
1. **Flag with `[CITATION-REQUIRED]`** in the output and list in a "Verification gap" section.
2. **Demote the assertion to a conditional**: "If [source] is correct, then…"
3. **Remove the assertion** if it's load-bearing but unsupportable.
Never invent or fabricate sources. Never paper over with weasel phrases ("studies have shown," "it is widely known").
### Phase 5: Emit
Produce four artifacts as a set:
1. **The transformed artifact** — original content with dynamics parametrized and assertions cited.
2. **`.env.example`** (or platform equivalent) — every variable with comment and sample value.
3. **`CITATIONS.md`** — full bibliography organized by section, with accessed-dates and brief notes on independence.
4. **`TRANSFORMATION_LOG.md`** — what was changed, what was flagged, what was removed, with rationale.
The four-artifact emission is non-negotiable. Shipping the transformed artifact without the `.env.example` strands the user; without `CITATIONS.md` the citations are unverifiable; without the log the user can't audit what you changed.
## What counts as dynamic — edge cases
Some particulars feel permanent but are dynamic on reuse. Treat each as a variable:
- **"The current year"** — `DATE_PUBLICATION_YEAR`, not literal `2026`
- **"Our team size"** — `STAT_TEAM_HEADCOUNT`, even if it changes annually
- **License names** — `IDENTITY_LICENSE_TYPE`, in case the template is reused under different terms
- **Tone-of-voice phrases unique to a brand** — these are dynamic; the structure of the sentence is reusable
- **Compliance thresholds tied to a jurisdiction** — `THRESHOLD_GDPR_RETENTION_DAYS`, in case the template moves to another regime
If you're unsure whether something is dynamic, parametrize it. The cost of an extra env var is near-zero. The cost of a hard-coded value that needed to vary is reissuing the whole artifact.
## What counts as an assertion — edge cases
These are assertions and require citation:
- "X is the largest provider in Y market"
- "23% of users churn within 30 days"
- "This complies with regulation Z"
- "Method A is faster than method B"
- "The acquisition closed on date D for price P"
These are NOT assertions (no citation needed):
- "We recommend X because…" (recommendation)
- "Consider whether Y applies to your context" (advice)
- "This document describes our approach to Z" (descriptive)
- "Section 3 covers configuration" (structural)
If a sentence both recommends AND asserts, split it: "Adopt approach X (recommendation). Approach X has been measured at 40% lower latency [^1][^2] (assertion)."
## Output verification checklist
Before declaring the transformation complete, verify:
- [ ] Every concrete paRelated in General
modeling-omnistudio-epc-catalog
IncludedSalesforce Industries CME EPC product-modeling skill for Product2-based catalog creation. Use when creating EPC products, configuring product attributes, building offer bundles with Product Child Items, or reviewing EPC DataPack JSON metadata for product catalog changes. TRIGGER when: user creates or updates Product2 EPC records, AttributeAssignment payloads, AttributeMetadata/AttributeDefaultValues, Offer bundles, or ProductChildItem relationships. DO NOT TRIGGER when: designing OmniScripts/FlexCards/Integration Procedures (use building-omnistudio-omniscript, building-omnistudio-flexcard, or building-omnistudio-integration-procedure), implementing Apex business logic (use generating-apex), or troubleshooting deployment pipelines (use deploying-metadata).
relationship-science-coach
IncludedUse this skill for direct, practical adult relationship coaching: couples conflict, repair, trust, marriage, dating, flirting, attachment patterns, emotional connection, sex, desire differences, eroticism, kink negotiation, affection, love languages, breakups, and long-term passion. Draw on Gottman, EFT and Hold Me Tight, attachment science, modern sex research, Perel, Nagoski, Kerner, Schnarch, Love and Stosny, and flexible love-language tools. Be concrete and low-hedge. Redirect only for imminent danger, abuse, coercive control, minors, non-consent, self-harm, stalking, or medical/legal/psychiatric decisions.
building-sf-integrations
IncludedSalesforce integration architecture and runtime plumbing with 120-point scoring. Use this skill to set up Named Credentials, External Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callout patterns, Platform Events, and Change Data Capture. TRIGGER when: user sets up Named Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callouts, Platform Events, CDC, or touches .namedCredential-meta.xml files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Connected App/OAuth config (use configuring-connected-apps), Apex-only logic (use generating-apex), or data import/export (use handling-sf-data).
venue-templates
IncludedAccess comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.
let-fate-decide
IncludedDraws the 12 Houses of the Zodiac Tarot spread to inject entropy into planning when prompts are vague, ambiguous, or casually delegated. Interprets the spread to guide next steps. Use when the user says 'let fate decide', 'YOLO', 'whatever', 'idk', or other nonchalant phrases, makes Yu-Gi-Oh references, or when you are about to arbitrarily pick between multiple reasonable approaches. Prefer over ask-questions-if-underspecified when the user's tone is casual or playful rather than precision-seeking.
net-ops
IncludedCross-platform network troubleshooting (Windows, macOS, Linux) via local or remote shell. Use for: DNS broken, can't resolve hostnames, nslookup/dig works but apps fail, NRPT, WFP, scutil, /etc/resolver, systemd-resolved, /etc/resolv.conf, NetworkManager, VPN DNS leak residue (ProtonVPN/Mullvad/WireGuard/AnyConnect), AV/firewall blocking DNS or DoH, Tailscale DNS interaction, intermittent connectivity, remote diagnostics over SSH.