payment-idempotency
Apply when implementing idempotency logic in payment connector code or handling duplicate payment requests. Covers paymentId as idempotency key, payment state machine transitions, retry semantics for cancellation and refund operations, and requestId handling. Use for preventing duplicate charges and ensuring correct Gateway retry behavior across Create Payment, Cancel, Capture, and Refund endpoints.
What this skill does
# Idempotency & Duplicate Prevention
## When this skill applies
Use this skill when:
- Implementing any PPP endpoint handler that processes payments, cancellations, captures, or refunds
- Ensuring repeated Gateway calls with the same identifiers produce identical results without re-processing
- Building a payment state machine to prevent invalid transitions (e.g., capturing a cancelled payment)
- Handling the Gateway's 7-day retry window for `undefined` status payments
Do not use this skill for:
- PPP endpoint response shapes and HTTP methods — use [`payment-provider-protocol`](../payment-provider-protocol/SKILL.md)
- Async callback URL notification logic — use [`payment-async-flow`](../payment-async-flow/SKILL.md)
- PCI compliance and Secure Proxy — use [`payment-pci-security`](../payment-pci-security/SKILL.md)
## Decision rules
- Use `paymentId` as the idempotency key for Create Payment — every call with the same `paymentId` must return the same result.
- Use `requestId` as the idempotency key for Cancel, Capture, and Refund operations.
- If the Gateway sends a second Create Payment with the same `paymentId`, return the stored response without calling the acquirer again.
- Async payment methods (Boleto, Pix) MUST return `status: "undefined"` — never `"approved"` until the acquirer confirms.
- A payment moves through defined states: `undefined` → `approved` → `settled`, or `undefined` → `denied`, or `approved` → `cancelled`. Enforce valid transitions only.
- Use a persistent data store (PostgreSQL, DynamoDB, VBase for VTEX IO) — never in-memory storage that is lost on restart.
## Hard constraints
### Constraint: MUST use paymentId as idempotency key for Create Payment
The connector MUST check for an existing record with the given `paymentId` before processing a new payment. If a record exists, return the stored response without calling the acquirer again.
**Why this matters**
The VTEX Gateway retries Create Payment requests with `undefined` status for up to 7 days. Without idempotency on `paymentId`, each retry creates a new charge at the acquirer, resulting in duplicate charges to the customer. This is a financial loss and a critical production incident.
**Detection**
If the Create Payment handler does not check for an existing `paymentId` before processing, STOP. The handler must query the data store for the `paymentId` first.
**Correct**
```typescript
async function createPaymentHandler(req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
const { paymentId } = req.body;
// Check for existing payment — idempotency guard
const existingPayment = await paymentStore.findByPaymentId(paymentId);
if (existingPayment) {
// Return the exact same response — no new acquirer call
res.status(200).json(existingPayment.response);
return;
}
// First time seeing this paymentId — process with acquirer
const result = await acquirer.authorize(req.body);
const response = {
paymentId,
status: result.status,
authorizationId: result.authorizationId ?? null,
nsu: result.nsu ?? null,
tid: result.tid ?? null,
acquirer: "MyProvider",
code: result.code ?? null,
message: result.message ?? null,
delayToAutoSettle: 21600,
delayToAutoSettleAfterAntifraud: 1800,
delayToCancel: 21600,
};
// Store the response for future idempotent lookups
await paymentStore.save(paymentId, { request: req.body, response });
res.status(200).json(response);
}
```
**Wrong**
```typescript
async function createPaymentHandler(req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
const { paymentId } = req.body;
// No idempotency check — every call hits the acquirer
// If the Gateway retries this (which it will for undefined status),
// the customer gets charged multiple times
const result = await acquirer.authorize(req.body);
res.status(200).json({
paymentId,
status: result.status,
authorizationId: result.authorizationId ?? null,
nsu: result.nsu ?? null,
tid: result.tid ?? null,
acquirer: "MyProvider",
code: null,
message: null,
delayToAutoSettle: 21600,
delayToAutoSettleAfterAntifraud: 1800,
delayToCancel: 21600,
});
}
```
### Constraint: MUST return identical response for duplicate requests
When the connector receives a Create Payment request with a `paymentId` that already exists in the data store, it MUST return the exact stored response. It MUST NOT create a new record, generate new identifiers, or re-process the payment.
**Why this matters**
The Gateway uses the response fields (`authorizationId`, `tid`, `nsu`, `status`) to track the transaction. If a retry returns different values, the Gateway loses track of the original transaction, causing reconciliation failures and potential double settlements.
**Detection**
If the handler creates a new database record or generates new identifiers when it finds an existing `paymentId`, STOP. The handler must return the previously stored response verbatim.
**Correct**
```typescript
async function createPaymentHandler(req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
const { paymentId } = req.body;
const existing = await paymentStore.findByPaymentId(paymentId);
if (existing) {
// Return the EXACT stored response — same authorizationId, tid, nsu, status
res.status(200).json(existing.response);
return;
}
// ... process new payment and store response
}
```
**Wrong**
```typescript
async function createPaymentHandler(req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
const { paymentId } = req.body;
const existing = await paymentStore.findByPaymentId(paymentId);
if (existing) {
// WRONG: Generating new identifiers for an existing payment
// The Gateway will see different tid/nsu and lose track of the transaction
const newTid = generateNewTid();
res.status(200).json({
...existing.response,
tid: newTid, // Different from original — breaks reconciliation
nsu: generateNewNsu(),
});
return;
}
// ... process new payment
}
```
### Constraint: MUST NOT approve async payments synchronously
If a payment method is asynchronous (e.g., Boleto, Pix, bank redirect), the Create Payment response MUST return `status: "undefined"`. It MUST NOT return `status: "approved"` or `status: "denied"` until the payment is actually confirmed or rejected by the acquirer.
**Why this matters**
Returning `approved` for an async method tells the Gateway the payment is confirmed before the customer has actually paid. The order ships, but no money was collected. The merchant loses the product and the revenue. The correct flow is to return `undefined` and use the `callbackUrl` to notify the Gateway when the payment is confirmed.
**Detection**
If the Create Payment handler returns `status: "approved"` or `status: "denied"` for an asynchronous payment method (Boleto, Pix, bank transfer, redirect-based), STOP. Async methods must return `"undefined"` and use callbacks.
**Correct**
```typescript
async function createPaymentHandler(req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
const { paymentId, paymentMethod, callbackUrl } = req.body;
const isAsyncMethod = ["BankInvoice", "Pix"].includes(paymentMethod);
if (isAsyncMethod) {
const pending = await acquirer.initiateAsyncPayment(req.body);
await paymentStore.save(paymentId, {
status: "undefined",
callbackUrl,
acquirerRef: pending.reference,
});
res.status(200).json({
paymentId,
status: "undefined", // Correct for async
authorizationId: pending.authorizationId ?? null,
nsu: pending.nsu ?? null,
tid: pending.tid ?? null,
acquirer: "MyProvider",
code: "ASYNC-PENDING",
message: "Awaiting customer payment",
delayToAutoSettle: 21600,
delayToAutoSettleAfterAntifraud: 1800,
delayToCancel: 604800, // 7 days for async
paymentUrl: pending.paymentUrl,
});
return;
}
// Sync methods can return approved/denied immediately
// ..Related in Sales & CRM
process-mapper
IncludedUse when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being worked, and quantify the gap between processing time and total elapsed time. Pairs Lean / Six Sigma / Theory-of-Constraints canon with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a process map, a ranked bottleneck list (with severity + root-cause hypothesis), and a cycle-time analysis (P50, P90, value-add ratio, Little's-Law throughput). Distinct from sales-pipeline, system-reliability (SLO), and strategic-OKR work — this is tactical process documentation for internal operations.
payment-integration
IncludedIntegrate payments with SePay (VietQR), Polar, Stripe, Paddle (MoR subscriptions), Creem.io (licensing). Checkout, webhooks, subscriptions, QR codes, multi-provider orders.
customer-success-manager
IncludedMonitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success
sales-engineer
IncludedAnalyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.
customer-success-manager
IncludedMonitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success
sales-engineer
IncludedAnalyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.