payment-provider-protocol
Apply when implementing a VTEX Payment Provider Protocol (PPP) connector or working with payment/connector endpoint files. Covers all nine required endpoints: Manifest, Create Payment, Cancel, Capture/Settle, Refund, Inbound Request, Create Auth Token, Provider Auth Redirect, and Get Credentials. Use for building or debugging any payment connector that integrates with the VTEX Payment Gateway.
What this skill does
# PPP Endpoint Implementation
## When this skill applies
Use this skill when:
- Building a new payment connector middleware that integrates a PSP with the VTEX Payment Gateway
- Implementing, debugging, or extending any of the 9 PPP endpoints
- Preparing a connector for VTEX Payment Provider Test Suite homologation
Do not use this skill for:
- Idempotency and duplicate prevention logic — use [`payment-idempotency`](../payment-idempotency/SKILL.md)
- Async payment flows and callback URLs — use [`payment-async-flow`](../payment-async-flow/SKILL.md)
- PCI compliance and Secure Proxy card handling — use [`payment-pci-security`](../payment-pci-security/SKILL.md)
## Decision rules
- The connector MUST implement all 6 payment-flow endpoints: Manifest, Create Payment, Cancel, Capture/Settle, Refund, Inbound Request.
- The configuration flow (3 endpoints: Create Auth Token, Provider Auth Redirect, Get Credentials) is optional but recommended for merchant onboarding.
- All endpoints must be served over HTTPS on port 443 with TLS 1.2.
- The connector must respond in under 5 seconds during homologation tests and under 20 seconds in production.
- The provider must be PCI-DSS certified or use Secure Proxy for card payments.
- The Gateway initiates all calls. The middleware never calls the Gateway except via `callbackUrl` (async notifications) and Secure Proxy (card data forwarding).
## Hard constraints
### Constraint: Implement all required payment flow endpoints
The connector MUST implement all six payment-flow endpoints: GET `/manifest`, POST `/payments`, POST `/payments/{paymentId}/cancellations`, POST `/payments/{paymentId}/settlements`, POST `/payments/{paymentId}/refunds`, and POST `/payments/{paymentId}/inbound-request/{action}`.
**Why this matters**
The VTEX Payment Provider Test Suite validates every endpoint during homologation. Missing endpoints cause test failures and the connector will not be approved. At runtime, the Gateway expects all endpoints — a missing cancel endpoint means payments cannot be voided.
**Detection**
If the connector router/handler file does not define handlers for all 6 payment-flow paths, STOP and add the missing endpoints before proceeding.
**Correct**
```typescript
import { Router } from "express";
const router = Router();
// All 6 payment-flow endpoints implemented
router.get("/manifest", manifestHandler);
router.post("/payments", createPaymentHandler);
router.post("/payments/:paymentId/cancellations", cancelPaymentHandler);
router.post("/payments/:paymentId/settlements", capturePaymentHandler);
router.post("/payments/:paymentId/refunds", refundPaymentHandler);
router.post("/payments/:paymentId/inbound-request/:action", inboundRequestHandler);
export default router;
```
**Wrong**
```typescript
import { Router } from "express";
const router = Router();
// Missing manifest, inbound-request, and refund endpoints
// This will fail homologation and break runtime operations
router.post("/payments", createPaymentHandler);
router.post("/payments/:paymentId/cancellations", cancelPaymentHandler);
router.post("/payments/:paymentId/settlements", capturePaymentHandler);
export default router;
```
### Constraint: Return correct HTTP status codes and response shapes
Each endpoint MUST return the exact response shape documented in the PPP API. Create Payment MUST return `paymentId`, `status`, `authorizationId`, `tid`, `nsu`, `acquirer`, `code`, `message`, `delayToAutoSettle`, `delayToAutoSettleAfterAntifraud`, and `delayToCancel`. Cancel MUST return `paymentId`, `cancellationId`, `code`, `message`, `requestId`. Capture MUST return `paymentId`, `settleId`, `value`, `code`, `message`, `requestId`. Refund MUST return `paymentId`, `refundId`, `value`, `code`, `message`, `requestId`.
**Why this matters**
The Gateway parses these fields programmatically. Missing fields cause deserialization errors and the Gateway treats the payment as failed. Incorrect `delayToAutoSettle` values cause payments to auto-cancel or auto-capture at wrong times.
**Detection**
If a response object is missing any of the required fields for its endpoint, STOP and add the missing fields.
**Correct**
```typescript
interface CreatePaymentResponse {
paymentId: string;
status: "approved" | "denied" | "undefined";
authorizationId: string | null;
nsu: string | null;
tid: string | null;
acquirer: string | null;
code: string | null;
message: string | null;
delayToAutoSettle: number;
delayToAutoSettleAfterAntifraud: number;
delayToCancel: number;
paymentUrl?: string;
}
async function createPaymentHandler(req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
const { paymentId, value, currency, paymentMethod, card, callbackUrl } = req.body;
const result = await processPaymentWithAcquirer(req.body);
const response: CreatePaymentResponse = {
paymentId,
status: result.status,
authorizationId: result.authorizationId ?? null,
nsu: result.nsu ?? null,
tid: result.tid ?? null,
acquirer: "MyAcquirer",
code: result.code ?? null,
message: result.message ?? null,
delayToAutoSettle: 21600, // 6 hours in seconds
delayToAutoSettleAfterAntifraud: 1800, // 30 minutes in seconds
delayToCancel: 21600, // 6 hours in seconds
};
res.status(200).json(response);
}
```
**Wrong**
```typescript
// Missing required fields — Gateway will reject this response
async function createPaymentHandler(req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
const result = await processPaymentWithAcquirer(req.body);
// Missing: authorizationId, nsu, tid, acquirer, code, message,
// delayToAutoSettle, delayToAutoSettleAfterAntifraud, delayToCancel
res.status(200).json({
paymentId: req.body.paymentId,
status: result.status,
});
}
```
### Constraint: Manifest must declare all supported payment methods
The GET `/manifest` endpoint MUST return a `paymentMethods` array listing every payment method the connector supports, with the correct `name` and `allowsSplit` configuration for each.
**Why this matters**
The Gateway reads the manifest to determine which payment methods are available. If a method is missing, merchants cannot configure it in the VTEX Admin. An incorrect `allowsSplit` value causes split payment failures.
**Detection**
If the manifest handler returns an empty `paymentMethods` array or hardcodes methods the provider does not actually support, STOP and fix the manifest.
**Correct**
```typescript
async function manifestHandler(_req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
const manifest = {
paymentMethods: [
{ name: "Visa", allowsSplit: "onCapture" },
{ name: "Mastercard", allowsSplit: "onCapture" },
{ name: "American Express", allowsSplit: "onCapture" },
{ name: "BankInvoice", allowsSplit: "onAuthorize" },
{ name: "Pix", allowsSplit: "disabled" },
],
};
res.status(200).json(manifest);
}
```
**Wrong**
```typescript
// Empty manifest — no payment methods will appear in the Admin
async function manifestHandler(_req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
res.status(200).json({ paymentMethods: [] });
}
```
## Preferred pattern
Architecture overview:
```text
Shopper → VTEX Checkout → VTEX Payment Gateway → [Your Connector Middleware] → Acquirer/PSP
↕
Configuration Flow (Admin)
```
Recommended TypeScript interfaces for all endpoint contracts:
```typescript
// --- Manifest ---
interface ManifestResponse {
paymentMethods: Array<{
name: string;
allowsSplit: "onCapture" | "onAuthorize" | "disabled";
}>;
}
// --- Create Payment ---
interface CreatePaymentRequest {
reference: string;
orderId: string;
transactionId: string;
paymentId: string;
paymentMethod: string;
value: number;
currency: string;
installments: number;
card?: {
holder: string;
number: string;
csc: string;
expiration: { month: string; year: string };
};
miniCart: Record<string, unknRelated in Sales & CRM
process-mapper
IncludedUse when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being worked, and quantify the gap between processing time and total elapsed time. Pairs Lean / Six Sigma / Theory-of-Constraints canon with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a process map, a ranked bottleneck list (with severity + root-cause hypothesis), and a cycle-time analysis (P50, P90, value-add ratio, Little's-Law throughput). Distinct from sales-pipeline, system-reliability (SLO), and strategic-OKR work — this is tactical process documentation for internal operations.
payment-integration
IncludedIntegrate payments with SePay (VietQR), Polar, Stripe, Paddle (MoR subscriptions), Creem.io (licensing). Checkout, webhooks, subscriptions, QR codes, multi-provider orders.
customer-success-manager
IncludedMonitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success
sales-engineer
IncludedAnalyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.
customer-success-manager
IncludedMonitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success
sales-engineer
IncludedAnalyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.