performing-privileged-account-access-review
Conduct systematic reviews of privileged accounts to validate access rights, identify excessive permissions, and enforce least privilege across PAM infrastructure.
What this skill does
# Performing Privileged Account Access Review
## Overview
Privileged Account Access Review is a critical identity governance process that validates whether users with elevated permissions still require their access. This review covers domain admins, service accounts, database administrators, cloud IAM roles, and application-level privileged accounts. Regular access reviews are mandated by SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and SOX compliance frameworks, typically required quarterly for high-privilege accounts.
## When to Use
- When conducting security assessments that involve performing privileged account access review
- When following incident response procedures for related security events
- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
## Prerequisites
- PAM solution deployed (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Delinea, or equivalent)
- Identity governance platform (SailPoint, Saviynt, or equivalent)
- Complete inventory of privileged accounts across all platforms
- Defined access review policy with SLAs and escalation procedures
- Designated reviewers (account owners, managers, security team)
## Core Concepts
### Privileged Account Categories
| Category | Examples | Risk Level | Review Frequency |
|----------|----------|------------|-----------------|
| Domain Admins | Enterprise Admin, Domain Admin, Schema Admin | Critical | Monthly |
| Service Accounts | SQL service, backup agents, monitoring agents | High | Quarterly |
| Cloud IAM | AWS root, Azure Global Admin, GCP Owner | Critical | Monthly |
| Database Admin | DBA accounts, sa/sys accounts | High | Quarterly |
| Application Admin | App admin roles, API keys with admin scope | Medium | Semi-annually |
| Emergency/Break-glass | Firecall accounts, emergency access | Critical | After each use |
### Four-Pillar Review Framework
```
DISCOVER VALIDATE REMEDIATE MONITOR
│ │ │ │
├─ Enumerate all ├─ Verify business ├─ Remove excess ├─ Continuous
│ privileged accounts │ justification │ privileges │ monitoring
│ │ │ │
├─ Identify orphaned ├─ Confirm account ├─ Disable orphaned ├─ Anomaly
│ accounts │ ownership │ accounts │ detection
│ │ │ │
├─ Map permissions to ├─ Check compliance ├─ Enforce password ├─ Session
│ business roles │ with policies │ rotation │ recording
│ │ │ │
└─ Classify by risk └─ Review last usage └─ Implement JIT └─ Audit
level and activity access logging
```
## Workflow
### Step 1: Account Discovery and Inventory
Enumerate all privileged accounts across the environment:
**Active Directory:**
- Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, Schema Admins groups
- Accounts with AdminCount=1 attribute
- Service accounts with SPN (Service Principal Names)
- Accounts with delegation rights (Unconstrained/Constrained)
**Cloud Platforms:**
- AWS: IAM users/roles with AdministratorAccess, PowerUserAccess, or `iam:*` permissions
- Azure: Global Administrator, Privileged Role Administrator, Security Administrator roles
- GCP: Owner, Editor roles at organization/project level
**Databases:**
- SQL Server: sysadmin, db_owner, securityadmin fixed roles
- Oracle: DBA, SYSDBA, SYSOPER privileges
- PostgreSQL: superuser, createrole, createdb attributes
### Step 2: Establish Review Criteria
Each privileged account must be evaluated against:
1. **Business Justification**: Does the user's current role require this privilege?
2. **Least Privilege**: Can the task be performed with lower privileges?
3. **Account Activity**: Has the account been active in the last 90 days?
4. **Compliance Status**: Does the account meet password policy, MFA requirements?
5. **Separation of Duties**: Does the access create SoD conflicts?
6. **Ownership**: Is a responsible owner assigned and active?
### Step 3: Conduct the Review
For each account, the designated reviewer must:
1. Review the account details, permissions, and last activity date
2. Approve (certify) the access if still required with documented justification
3. Revoke access if no longer needed or the reviewer cannot justify the privilege
4. Flag for investigation if anomalous activity or policy violations are detected
5. Escalate if the reviewer cannot make a determination
Decision matrix:
| Condition | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| Active user, justified privilege | Certify - maintain access |
| Active user, excessive privilege | Remediate - reduce to least privilege |
| Inactive > 90 days | Disable account, notify owner |
| No owner identified | Disable account, escalate to security |
| SoD conflict detected | Remediate - reassign or add compensating controls |
| Break-glass account | Verify last use was authorized, reset credentials |
### Step 4: Remediation and Enforcement
After reviews are completed:
- Revoke access for accounts that were not certified within the SLA period
- Implement automatic revocation for accounts not reviewed within 14 days
- Rotate credentials for all certified privileged accounts
- Convert standing privileges to just-in-time (JIT) access where possible
- Update PAM vault with current account inventory
### Step 5: Reporting and Documentation
Generate review reports including:
- Total accounts reviewed vs. total in scope
- Certification rate (approved vs. revoked)
- Average review completion time
- Overdue reviews and escalations
- Remediation actions taken
- Comparison with previous review cycle
## Validation Checklist
- [ ] Complete inventory of all privileged accounts documented
- [ ] All accounts assigned to a responsible owner/reviewer
- [ ] Review criteria and decision matrix defined
- [ ] Reviewers completed certification within SLA (14 days)
- [ ] Revoked accounts disabled and credentials rotated
- [ ] Orphaned accounts identified and disabled
- [ ] Service accounts reviewed for least privilege
- [ ] Break-glass accounts audited for authorized use only
- [ ] Review report generated with metrics and trends
- [ ] Remediation tickets created and tracked to completion
- [ ] Evidence preserved for compliance audit
## References
- [NIST SP 800-53 AC-2: Account Management](https://csf.tools/reference/nist-sp-800-53/r5/ac/ac-2/)
- [CIS Controls v8 - Control 5: Account Management](https://www.cisecurity.org/controls/account-management)
- [Netwrix PAM Best Practices Guide](https://netwrix.com/en/resources/guides/privileged-account-management-best-practices/)
- [StrongDM PAM Best Practices 2025](https://www.strongdm.com/blog/privileged-access-management-best-practices)
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.