perplexity-known-pitfalls
Identify and avoid Perplexity anti-patterns and common integration mistakes. Use when reviewing Perplexity code, onboarding new developers, or auditing existing integrations for best practices violations. Trigger with phrases like "perplexity mistakes", "perplexity anti-patterns", "perplexity pitfalls", "perplexity code review", "perplexity gotchas".
What this skill does
# Perplexity Known Pitfalls
## Overview
Real gotchas when integrating Perplexity Sonar API. Perplexity uses an OpenAI-compatible chat endpoint but performs live web searches -- a fundamentally different paradigm from standard LLM completions. These pitfalls come from treating it like a regular chatbot.
## Prerequisites
- Perplexity API key configured
- Understanding of OpenAI-compatible chat API format
## Pitfalls
### 1. Using It as a Generic Chatbot
Perplexity searches the web per request. Using it for tasks that don't need web search wastes money.
```python
# BAD: general chatbot (wastes a search query)
response = call_perplexity("Write me a haiku about cats")
# Costs $0.005+ for something any LLM can do offline
# GOOD: leverage web search capability
response = call_perplexity(
"What are the latest Next.js 15 features released this month?",
search_recency_filter="month"
)
```
### 2. Ignoring Citations
Perplexity returns `[1]`, `[2]` markers in text with a separate `citations` array. Ignoring them loses the key value prop.
```python
data = response.model_dump() # or response.json() for raw HTTP
answer = data["choices"][0]["message"]["content"]
citations = data.get("citations", []) # NOT in choices — top-level field
# BAD: displaying raw markers
print(answer) # "According to [1], Node.js 22 adds..."
# GOOD: replace markers with links
import re
for i, url in enumerate(citations, 1):
answer = answer.replace(f"[{i}]", f"{i}")
```
### 3. Using Wrong SDK Import
There is no `@perplexity/sdk` or `perplexity` Python package. Use the standard OpenAI client.
```typescript
// BAD — this package doesn't exist
import { PerplexityClient } from "@perplexity/sdk";
// GOOD — use OpenAI client with Perplexity base URL
import OpenAI from "openai";
const client = new OpenAI({
apiKey: process.env.PERPLEXITY_API_KEY,
baseURL: "https://api.perplexity.ai",
});
```
### 4. Not Setting max_tokens
Without `max_tokens`, responses can be arbitrarily long, increasing costs unpredictably.
```typescript
// BAD: no token limit — output cost can spike
await client.chat.completions.create({
model: "sonar-pro", // $15/M output tokens!
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "Tell me about AI" }],
});
// GOOD: always set max_tokens
await client.chat.completions.create({
model: "sonar-pro",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "Tell me about AI" }],
max_tokens: 1024,
});
```
### 5. No Recency Filter for Time-Sensitive Queries
Without `search_recency_filter`, Perplexity may cite outdated articles.
```python
# BAD: may return articles from any time period
response = call_perplexity("current Bitcoin price")
# GOOD: constrain to recent results
response = call_perplexity(
"current Bitcoin price",
search_recency_filter="day" # hour | day | week | month
)
```
### 6. Sending Full Conversation History
Each message in the conversation may trigger new search queries. Sending 20 turns of history is expensive and slow.
```python
# BAD: 20 turns of history = many search queries
messages = long_history + [{"role": "user", "content": "summarize"}]
# GOOD: summarize context, send focused query
messages = [
{"role": "system", "content": "Answer based on web search."},
{"role": "user", "content": f"Context: {summary}\nQuestion: {question}"}
]
```
### 7. Using sonar-pro for Simple Queries
`sonar-pro` costs 3-15x more than `sonar`. Using it for simple factual lookups wastes budget.
```typescript
// BAD: sonar-pro for a trivial question
await client.chat.completions.create({
model: "sonar-pro", // $3 input + $15 output per M tokens
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "What is the capital of France?" }],
});
// GOOD: match model to complexity
const model = isComplexQuery(query) ? "sonar-pro" : "sonar";
```
### 8. Mixing Allowlist and Denylist in Domain Filter
`search_domain_filter` supports either allowlist (include) or denylist (exclude with `-` prefix), but not both in the same request.
```typescript
// BAD: mixing modes
search_domain_filter: ["python.org", "-reddit.com"] // ERROR
// GOOD: pick one mode
search_domain_filter: ["python.org", "docs.python.org"] // Allowlist
// OR
search_domain_filter: ["-reddit.com", "-quora.com"] // Denylist
```
### 9. Not Caching Search Results
Every uncached call performs a web search. At scale, duplicate queries burn budget.
```typescript
// BAD: same query hits API every time
app.get("/search", (req, res) => {
const result = await client.chat.completions.create({ ... });
res.json(result);
});
// GOOD: cache by query hash
const cache = new LRUCache({ max: 1000, ttl: 3600_000 });
app.get("/search", (req, res) => {
const key = hash(req.query.q);
if (cache.has(key)) return res.json(cache.get(key));
const result = await client.chat.completions.create({ ... });
cache.set(key, result);
res.json(result);
});
```
### 10. Wrong Base URL
The API is at `api.perplexity.ai`, not `api.perplexity.com`.
```typescript
// BAD
baseURL: "https://api.perplexity.com" // Wrong domain
// GOOD
baseURL: "https://api.perplexity.ai" // Correct
```
## Code Review Checklist
- [ ] Uses `openai` package, not fake `@perplexity/sdk`
- [ ] Base URL is `https://api.perplexity.ai`
- [ ] `max_tokens` set on every request
- [ ] Citations parsed from `response.citations` array
- [ ] `search_recency_filter` used for time-sensitive queries
- [ ] Caching implemented for repeated queries
- [ ] Model routing: sonar for simple, sonar-pro for complex
- [ ] Conversation history trimmed before sending
- [ ] PII sanitized from queries
- [ ] Domain filter uses only allowlist OR denylist, not both
## Error Handling
| Pitfall | Impact | Detection |
|---------|--------|-----------|
| No caching | 3-5x cost overrun | Check cache hit rate metric |
| Wrong model | Budget waste | Grep for `sonar-pro` in simple query paths |
| No max_tokens | Unpredictable costs | Grep for `create()` calls without `max_tokens` |
| PII in queries | Privacy violation | Run sanitization check in CI |
## Output
- Identified anti-patterns in existing code
- Applied fixes for each pitfall
- Code review checklist for ongoing quality
## Resources
- [Perplexity API Documentation](https://docs.perplexity.ai)
- [Perplexity Model Guide](https://docs.perplexity.ai/getting-started/models)
- [OpenAI Compatibility](https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/chat-completions-guide)
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.