philosophical-writing-argumentation
Compose clear, rigorous philosophical prose with well-structured arguments, anticipation of objections, and proper scholarly engagement with existing literature
What this skill does
# Philosophical Writing and Argumentation Skill Compose rigorous philosophical prose with clear arguments, systematic objection handling, and scholarly engagement. ## Overview The Philosophical Writing and Argumentation skill enables composition of clear, rigorous philosophical prose with well-structured arguments, systematic anticipation of objections, proper scholarly engagement with existing literature, and adherence to discipline conventions. ## Capabilities ### Argument Construction - Build clear argument structures - Develop premises systematically - Support conclusions adequately - Maintain logical validity - Ensure argument soundness ### Objection Handling - Anticipate potential objections - Address counterarguments fairly - Develop responses - Strengthen original position - Acknowledge limitations ### Scholarly Engagement - Survey relevant literature - Position within debates - Cite appropriately - Build on existing work - Make original contributions ### Prose Quality - Write clearly and precisely - Avoid unnecessary jargon - Structure effectively - Maintain appropriate style - Edit carefully ### Publication Preparation - Follow journal conventions - Prepare abstracts - Navigate peer review - Respond to reviewers - Manage revision process ## Usage Guidelines ### When to Use - Writing philosophical papers - Preparing publications - Developing dissertations - Teaching philosophical writing - Reviewing manuscripts ### Best Practices - Plan argument structure first - Write clearly for target audience - Engage literature thoroughly - Anticipate objections - Revise extensively ### Integration Points - Argument Mapping and Reconstruction skill - Scholarly Literature Synthesis skill - Conceptual Analysis skill - Formal Logic Analysis skill ## References - Philosophical Paper Drafting process - Peer Review and Scholarly Critique process - Philosophical Literature Review process - Academic Philosophy Writer Agent - Logic Analyst Agent
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.