phpunit-unit-test-reviewing
Internal sub-skill. Do not auto-activate. Use only when explicitly invoked by name by another skill or agent.
What this skill does
# PHPUnit Unit Test Review
Reviews a Shopware PHPUnit unit test for compliance with testing guidelines and best practices.
## Overview
Performs MCP-driven review of PHPUnit unit tests against Shopware testing conventions, organized by rule group (convention → design → unit → isolation → provider).
**Category-aware**: Rules are scoped to test categories (A: DTO, B: Service, C: Flow/Event, D: DAL, E: Exception) via MCP `mcp__plugin_test-writing_test-rules__get_rules` filtering.
**Scope-aware**: Accepts optional method names. When provided, enters scoped review mode — only violations within the named methods are reported. Class-level context (imports, `#[CoversClass]`, base class) is still read for understanding, but findings outside scoped methods are ignored.
**Output**: Structured report with code snippets and suggested fixes per references/output-format.md.
### Input
- `{test_path}` (required) — Path to the test file
- `{methods}` (optional) — List of test method names to scope the review to. When omitted, the full class is reviewed.
## Workflow
### Phase 1. Identify & Classify
1. Locate test file (by path or `Glob("tests/unit/**/*Test.php")`)
2. Verify in `tests/unit/` directory (abort if `tests/integration/`)
3. Check CoversClass covers exactly one class
4. Determine test category (A-E) per references/test-categories.md
5. Verify class structure order
6. Verify extends `TestCase` or appropriate base class
7. Count test methods (data providers, TestDox, conditionals)
8. Read source class under test (from `#[CoversClass]`) — needed by rules that analyze test-to-code-path coverage
9. If `{methods}` provided: verify each named method exists in the test class. If a method is not found, report it as a warning and continue with the remaining methods. If no methods match, abort with reason "No matching methods found."
### Phase 2. Rule Review Filters
All `mcp__plugin_test-writing_test-rules__get_rules` calls in Phases 3-7 include these shared filters: `test_type=unit, test_category={detected_category}, scoped_review={true if methods provided, omit otherwise}`.
### Scoped Review Filtering (Phases 3-7)
When `{methods}` is provided, apply this constraint to ALL rule detection in Phases 3-7:
- Apply detection logic only to the named methods and their associated data providers (identified by `#[DataProvider]` attributes on scoped methods)
- Skip methods not in the scope
- The rest of the class is available for context (e.g., checking if a data provider is shared, understanding import statements) but violations outside the scoped methods are not reported
### Phases 3-7. Review Rules by Group
For each group in the table below (in phase order), execute:
1. Call `mcp__plugin_test-writing_test-rules__get_rules(group={group})` with Phase 2 filters
2. For each rule:
a. Read the rule's Detection/Detection Algorithm sections
b. Apply the detection logic against the test code (and source class when marked below)
c. If the rule cross-references other rules, follow the cross-reference
d. Record violations with the rule's ID, title, and enforce level
3. Generate suggested fixes following each rule's Fix section
| Phase | Group | Covers | + Source class |
|-------|-------|--------|----------------|
| 3 | convention | Naming, attributes, TestDox, assertions, class structure, method ordering | |
| 4 | design | Conditionals, single behavior, test redundancy, data provider usage, coverage distribution | ✓ |
| 5 | unit | Behavior vs implementation focus, mocking strategy, call-count coupling | ✓ |
| 6 | isolation | FIRST principles (Independent, Repeatable), shared state, fixtures, feature flags | |
| 7 | provider | Data provider key quality, naming, yield patterns, TestDox parameters | |
### Phase 8. Generate Report
For output format and examples, see references/output-format.md.
Report each issue using the rule's ID and title from `mcp__plugin_test-writing_test-rules__get_rules`:
```
### [{rule_id}] {title}
```
Include for each issue:
- Current code snippet
- Suggested fix code snippet
Include full passed checks list.
### Output Contract
```yaml
scope:
mode: scoped | full
methods: [method1, method2] # only when mode=scoped
errors:
- rule_id: {from mcp__plugin_test-writing_test-rules__get_rules response}
title: {from mcp__plugin_test-writing_test-rules__get_rules response}
enforce: must-fix
location: ClassTest.php:45
current: |
# problematic code
suggested: |
# fixed code
warnings:
- rule_id: {from mcp__plugin_test-writing_test-rules__get_rules response}
title: {from mcp__plugin_test-writing_test-rules__get_rules response}
enforce: should-fix
location: ClassTest.php:78
current: |
# code
suggested: |
# improved code
```
## Troubleshooting
### Ambiguous Category Detection
When test characteristics match multiple categories:
1. Check primary class under test via `#[CoversClass]`
2. Use most restrictive category (D > C > B > A)
3. Exception tests (E) take precedence when `expectException` present
### Mixed Test Types
When a test class contains both unit and integration patterns:
- Abort with message: "Mixed test types detected - review unit test portions only"
- Flag the applicable rule if the test covers multiple classes
### MCP Tool Unavailability
If `mcp__plugin_test-writing_test-rules__get_rules` is unavailable:
- Report error: "test-rules MCP server not available — ensure the test-writing plugin is installed and Claude Code was restarted"
- Do not fall back to hardcoded checks
## Examples
### Status Values
| Status | Condition |
|--------|-----------|
| PASS | 0 errors, 0 warnings |
| NEEDS_ATTENTION | 0 errors, 1+ warnings |
| ISSUES_FOUND | 1+ errors |
### Output Format
For complete report structure and templates, see references/output-format.md.
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.