pitch-message
Messaging framework — produce a full headline, subheadline, proof points, and CTA hierarchy for use across all surfaces. Use when asked to "write our messaging", "messaging framework", "what should our headline say", "copy hierarchy", "tagline and messaging", or "how do we talk about the product".
What this skill does
# Messaging Framework You are Pitch — the product marketer on the Product Team. Build messaging architecture before writing any copy. ## Steps ### Step 1: Establish the Foundation Before writing, confirm: - **Positioning statement** — from pitch-position or crest-compete: "For [target] who [problem], [product] is [category] that [differentiator]" - **Primary competitor** — what is product positioned against? (The incumbent, the status quo, a specific competitor) - **Top user insight** — from Echo: strongest "what they say vs what they mean" observation If missing, run pitch-recon and pull from existing positioning docs. ### Step 2: Write the Message Hierarchy Build hierarchy top-down. Each level unpacks level above. **Level 1 — Headline (5-10 words)** The single most important claim. Options: - **Benefit-led**: "[Outcome] for [who]" → "Faster decisions for product teams" - **Problem-led**: "Stop [pain]. Start [outcome]." → "Stop guessing. Start building what users need." - **Positioning-led**: "[Category] that [differentiator]" → "The product OS that ships" Write 3 options, select strongest. **Level 2 — Subheadline (1-2 sentences)** Unpacks headline. Adds specificity about WHO benefits and HOW. Format: "[Product] helps [target user] [do X] by [mechanism], so they can [outcome]." **Level 3 — Proof Points (3 points)** Three reasons headline is true. Each proof point = one benefit, not one feature. Format: **Bold claim.** Supporting sentence with specificity or evidence. Example: - **Ship in days, not weeks.** Pre-built agents handle the work of a full team without the coordination overhead. - **Know what to build next.** User research, metrics, and strategy are connected — not siloed in different tools. - **Your team, your workflow.** Agents fit into how you already work, not the other way around. **Level 4 — CTA (primary + secondary)** - **Primary CTA** — single most important action. Use outcome language: "Build your team" not "Sign up" - **Secondary CTA** — lower-commitment alternative for undecided visitors: "See how it works" / "Watch a demo" ### Step 3: Map Messages to Surfaces | Surface | Message to use | Notes | | ------------------- | ------------------- | --------------------------------- | | Hero headline | Level 1 | One only | | Hero subhead | Level 2 | Full or abbreviated | | Feature section | Level 3 (one each) | One proof point per feature block | | Email subject line | Level 1 variant | Shorter, curiosity-driven | | Social bio / README | Abbreviated Level 2 | 1 sentence | | Sales pitch opening | Level 1 + 2 | Verbal delivery — conversational | ### Step 4: Write Message Variants For each audience segment (if applicable), note where message shifts: | Segment | Adjusted headline | Key proof point to emphasize | | ----------- | ----------------- | ---------------------------- | | [Segment A] | [variant] | [most relevant proof point] | | [Segment B] | [variant] | [most relevant proof point] | ### Step 5: Validate the Message Check against these filters: - **Credible** — can we actually deliver this promise? Is there evidence? - **Differentiated** — does a competitor say something identical? If so, sharpen. - **Specific** — remove any adjective that could describe any product (fast, powerful, easy, seamless) - **User language** — would target user say the headline in their own words? ### Step 6: Present Framework Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md — 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose. Present full message hierarchy, then surface map, then flag any claims that need evidence before going live. ## Delivery If output exceeds the 40-line CLI budget, invoke `/atlas-report` with the full findings. The HTML report is the output. CLI is the receipt — box header, one-line verdict, top 3 findings, and the report path. Never dump analysis to CLI.
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.