posthog-survey-creator
Create and configure surveys in PostHog through guided conversation. Use this skill when a user wants to create a survey, collect user feedback, run NPS/CSAT/CES/PMF surveys, gather product feedback, or understand user sentiment. The skill guides Product Managers through survey design by matching their goals to proven templates (or creating custom surveys), then configuring targeting and scheduling before creating via PostHog MCP tools.
What this skill does
# PostHog Survey Creator Guide users through creating effective surveys in PostHog via conversational flow. Target audience: Product Managers who need help with survey design, question wording, and targeting strategy. ## Critical Rules 1. **One question per message.** Wait for user response before proceeding. 2. **Use PostHog MCP first.** When MCP is available, query PostHog for information instead of asking the user. Always present findings for validation. 3. **Only ask users when MCP unavailable.** Fall back to questions only if MCP tools aren't accessible. 4. **Always create as draft.** Never offer to launch immediately. Surveys are created as drafts so users can review in PostHog before launching. ## PostHog MCP Detection At the start of conversation or when needing PostHog data, attempt to use MCP tools: - `posthog:event-definitions-list` — Get available events - `posthog:properties-list` — Get event or person properties - `posthog:surveys-get-all` — Check existing surveys - `posthog:feature-flag-get-all` — Get feature flags for linking **If MCP works:** Use data from PostHog and ask user to validate. **If MCP fails/unavailable:** Ask user directly about their PostHog setup. ## Conversation Flow ### Opening: Show the Journey When user asks to create a survey: ``` "I'll help you create a survey in PostHog. Here's what we'll figure out together: 1. **Goal** – What do you want to learn? 2. **Questions** – What to ask and how 3. **Audience** – Who should see this? 4. **Timing** – When and how often? Let's start with the goal. **What do you want to learn from this survey?**" ``` Wait for response. --- ### Step 1: Understand the Goal **Ask:** "What do you want to learn from this survey?" Listen for keywords to match templates: | Keywords | Template | |----------|----------| | "recommend", "loyalty", "NPS" | NPS | | "satisfied", "satisfaction" | CSAT | | "easy", "effort", "friction" | CES | | "disappointed", "product-market fit" | PMF | | "why signed up", "jobs to be done" | JTBD | | "price", "expensive", "value" | Pricing | | "competitor", "alternatives" | Competitive Intel | | "not using", "adoption" | Feature Adoption | | "beta", "new feature" | Beta Feedback | | "trial", "upgrade" | Trial Conversion | | "new user", "intent" | Welcome Survey | | "onboarding", "getting started" | Activation | | "inactive", "churned", "win back" | Dormant User | | "cancel", "leaving" | Churn/Exit | | "support", "ticket" | Support CSAT | **After response:** Present matching template OR explore custom, then proceed. --- ### Step 2: Present Template or Explore Custom #### If template matches: ``` "Based on what you're describing, a **Customer Effort Score (CES)** survey would work well. It measures how easy a task was—lower effort correlates with higher retention. The standard approach is: - Q1: Rating (1-7) – 'How easy was it to [task]?' - Q2: Open text (for low scores) – 'What made this difficult?' **Does this approach work for you, or would you like to customize it?**" ``` #### If no template matches: ``` "This sounds like a custom survey—I'll help you design one. **What's the single most important thing you want to learn?**" ``` --- ### Step 3: Finalize Questions If customizing, ask ONE question at a time until questions are defined. Once set, confirm: ``` "Here's what we have: [list questions] **Does this look right?**" ``` --- ### Step 4: Define Audience (MCP-First Approach) This is where PostHog MCP becomes critical. **Do not ask the user about events or properties if MCP is available.** #### With PostHog MCP available: 1. **First, ask the high-level targeting question:** ``` "Now let's decide who sees this survey. **Who should see it?** For example: - All users - Users on a specific page - A specific segment (paid users, new users, etc.) - Users who completed a specific action" ``` 2. **Based on their answer, query PostHog and present options:** **If they mention an action/event:** ``` [Use posthog:event-definitions-list to find matching events] "I found these events in your PostHog that might match: - `report_viewed` (1.2k times this month) - `report_created` (340 times this month) - `report_exported` (89 times this month) **Which event should trigger the survey?**" ``` **If they mention a user segment:** ``` [Use posthog:properties-list with type="person" to find properties] "I found these person properties you could filter by: - `plan` (values: free, pro, enterprise) - `signed_up_at` - `company_size` **Which property should we use, and what value?**" ``` **If they mention a page:** ``` "Got it—I'll target users on that page. **What's the URL or URL pattern?** (e.g., '/reports' or contains 'dashboard')" ``` 3. **If checking for existing similar surveys:** ``` [Use posthog:surveys-get-all to check for duplicates] "I noticed you already have an 'NPS Survey' running that targets the dashboard. **Should I create a new one, or would you like to modify the existing survey?**" ``` 4. **If linking to feature flags:** ``` [Use posthog:feature-flag-get-all if user mentions beta/feature flags] "I found these feature flags that might be relevant: - `new-reporting-feature` (currently 30% rollout) - `beta-dashboard-v2` (10% rollout) **Should the survey only show to users with one of these flags enabled?**" ``` #### Without PostHog MCP (fallback): If MCP tools fail or aren't available, ask the user directly: ``` "I don't have access to query your PostHog directly. **Do you know the event name for when users [complete the action]?** (If not, we can target by page URL instead)" ``` Or for properties: ``` "**What's the property name for [plan/segment] in your PostHog?** (e.g., 'plan', 'subscription_tier', etc.)" ``` --- ### Step 5: Configure Timing **Ask:** ``` "**Should this survey show once per user, or repeat over time?** - Once is good for most feedback surveys - Recurring works for NPS (e.g., every 90 days)" ``` If recurring, follow up: ``` "**How often should it repeat?**" ``` --- ### Step 6: Confirm and Create Summarize and ask for final confirmation: ``` "Here's the survey I'll create: **Name:** [name] **Questions:** 1. [Q1] 2. [Q2] **Audience:** [targeting details] **Schedule:** [once/recurring] I'll create this as a draft so you can review and adjust the styling in PostHog before launching. **Ready to create it?**" ``` Wait for confirmation, then use `posthog:survey-create` with `start_date: null` (draft). --- ### Step 7: After Creation ``` "Done! Here's your survey: [link] It's saved as a draft. From PostHog you can: - Preview how it looks - Adjust colors and styling - Launch when you're ready **Anything else you'd like help with?**" ``` --- ## MCP Query Patterns ### Finding events for targeting ``` 1. User says: "Users who created a report" 2. Query: posthog:event-definitions-list with q="report" 3. Present matches: "I found `report_created`, `report_viewed`, `report_shared`. Which one?" 4. User confirms ``` ### Finding person properties ``` 1. User says: "Paid users only" 2. Query: posthog:properties-list with type="person" 3. Look for: plan, subscription, tier, pricing-related properties 4. Present: "I found a `plan` property with values free/pro/enterprise. Should we target `plan` is not `free`?" 5. User confirms ``` ### Checking existing surveys ``` 1. Before creating, query: posthog:surveys-get-all 2. Check for similar names or targeting 3. If found: "You have an existing [survey name] with similar targeting. Create new or modify existing?" ``` ### Finding feature flags ``` 1. User mentions beta/feature rollout 2. Query: posthog:feature-flag-get-all 3. Present relevant flags: "I found `beta-feature-x`. Link the survey to this flag?" ``` --- ## Example Conversation (With MCP) **User:** "I want to create a surve
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.