pre-client
Pre-sales intelligence system. Ingests incoming emails, analyzes sender context, clusters related conversations, detects business opportunities, builds relationship timelines, and surfaces high-potential prospects for outreach.
What this skill does
# Pre-Client Identity Skill ## Overview The Pre-Client Identity Skill is the **incoming lead intelligence engine**. It: - Ingests and analyzes incoming emails automatically - Extracts sender company, role, and background - Clusters related messages into conversation threads - Detects buying signals and business problems - Builds relationship timelines for each prospect - Surfaces high-potential opportunities for follow-up Think of it as an AI that watches your inbox and alerts you when someone valuable walks in the door. ## Core Capabilities ### 1. Email Ingestion & Analysis **What it captures:** ``` FROM SENDER: - Name and email address - Company name (extracted from email domain or signature) - Job title/role - Reporting to (if mentioned) - Company size (estimated) - Phone number (if provided) - LinkedIn URL (if signature includes) - Location/timezone FROM EMAIL CONTENT: - Subject line (intent signal) - Body text (problem statement) - Attachments (RFP, proposal, documentation) - Links clicked (if tracking enabled) - Email tone (formal, casual, urgent, desperate) FROM EMAIL METADATA: - Date received - Time of day sent (weekend? off-hours?) - Reply time (how quickly they respond) - Response rate (how many emails before reply) - Thread history (how long have they been in conversation) EXAMPLE EMAIL ANALYSIS: From: [email protected] Subject: "Looking for better project management solution" SENDER PROFILE: - Name: Sarah Chen - Company: TechStartup Inc (estimated 25-50 people) - Role: Operations Manager - Location: San Francisco, CA (timezone: PST) - LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/sarahchen - Phone: Not provided EMAIL CONTENT: - Intent: Looking for solution (high intent signal) - Problem: Current project management tool isn't meeting needs - Pain points: Visibility, team collaboration, reporting - Budget indicator: Not mentioned - Timeline: "Looking to migrate Q1 2026" - Current solution: Using Monday.com - Dissatisfaction level: MODERATE (considering switch) EMAIL TONE: - Professional, respectful - Not urgent or desperate - Exploratory (gathering information) - Open to solutions (receptive) CONTEXT: - Email sent Tuesday 9 AM (business hours) - Took 2 hours to respond (attentive) - First email in thread - No attachments SCORING: - Fit score: 8/10 (perfect ICP match) - Intent score: 7/10 (genuine interest, not urgent) - Budget score: 5/10 (not mentioned, mid-market likely) - Timeline score: 8/10 (Q1 2026 is soon) - Response likelihood: 85% (warm prospect) ``` ### 2. Thread Clustering & Organization **Automatic conversation grouping:** ``` CLUSTERING ALGORITHM: Groups emails into conversations based on: 1. Same sender + same company 2. Same topic/problem domain 3. Time proximity (within 2 weeks suggests related) 4. Reply-to-reply chains (email threading) EXAMPLE CLUSTERED THREAD: Conversation ID: SARAH_CHEN_PROJECT_MGMT_001 Email 1 (Nov 15, 9:02 AM): From: [email protected] Subject: "Looking for better project management solution" [Initial inquiry] Email 2 (Nov 15, 2:15 PM): From: [email protected] Subject: "RE: Looking for better project management solution" [Follow-up with more details] Email 3 (Nov 16, 10:30 AM): From: [email protected] Subject: "RE: Pricing and implementation timeline?" [Asking about pricing and timeline] Email 4 (Nov 18, 3:45 PM): From: [email protected] (copied from email 3) Subject: "RE: Pricing and implementation timeline?" [CTO added to conversation - buying committee expanding] THREAD SUMMARY: - Duration: 3 days (active conversation) - Participants: 2 (Sarah + John) - Message count: 4 - Response time avg: 18 hours - Engagement level: HIGH - Buying committee growing: YES (CTO added) OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENT: - This is a REAL opportunity (not just browsing) - Buying committee forming (good sign) - Timeline moving fast (3 days) - Next step probability: 65% ``` ### 3. Buying Signals Detection **Identifies high-intent indicators:** ``` TIER 1: HIGHEST INTENT (Act immediately) Signal: "We need to migrate by Q1" Signal: "We've allocated budget for this" Signal: "We're evaluating vendors this month" Signal: "Your solution solves problem X that's costing us $Y" Signal: "When can you start implementation?" Signal: "Can you do a demo tomorrow?" Action: Schedule call immediately TIER 2: HIGH INTENT (Respond within hours) Signal: "We're looking for a solution like yours" Signal: "Our current tool doesn't support feature X" Signal: "How much does this cost?" Signal: "Can you send pricing and case studies?" Signal: "Tell me more about your solution" Signal: "Does this integrate with [their tools]?" Action: Respond with valuable information TIER 3: MODERATE INTENT (Follow up within 24 hours) Signal: "We might be interested in the future" Signal: "Just exploring options" Signal: "Can you add me to your mailing list?" Signal: "Do you have any case studies?" Signal: "What's your free trial period?" Action: Provide resources, nurture TIER 4: LOW INTENT (Add to nurture sequence) Signal: "Just curious what you do" Signal: "We're not looking to change right now" Signal: "Can I learn more about your company?" Signal: "Interesting product, thanks for sharing" Action: Long-term nurture, stay in touch EXAMPLE SIGNALS IN CONTEXT: Email: "We have budget allocated for this in Q1" Tier: 1 (HIGHEST) Reasoning: Budget allocated = money reserved Action: Call them before competitors do Email: "How long is your implementation timeline?" Tier: 1-2 (HIGH) Reasoning: Specific implementation question = ready to execute Action: Provide detailed timeline, case study Email: "Can you send us pricing?" Tier: 2 (HIGH) Reasoning: Asking about price = considering buying Action: Send pricing + case study showing ROI Email: "What do you charge?" Tier: 2-3 (MODERATE-HIGH) Reasoning: Price question, but phrased casually Action: Respond quickly with pricing framework Email: "Just browsing your website" Tier: 4 (LOW) Reasoning: No specific problem mentioned Action: Add to nurture, wait for signal ``` ### 4. Business Problem Detection **Identifies pain points and opportunity triggers:** ``` OPPORTUNITY TYPES: 1. TOOL REPLACEMENT Signal: "Our current [tool] isn't meeting our needs" Problem: Existing solution inadequate Opportunity: Replace with your solution Timeline: Usually 4-8 weeks Approach: Comparison guide, migration support Example: "We use Monday.com but it doesn't support our workflow" → You have project management solution → Create comparison: Monday.com vs. Your tool → Highlight features they specifically need → Timeline: Could migrate in Q1 2. PROCESS PAIN Signal: "We're struggling with [process]" Problem: Manual process, inefficiency Opportunity: Automate with your solution Timeline: Depends on complexity Approach: ROI calculator, process improvement plan Example: "We spend 20 hours/week on manual status reports" → Your solution automates reporting → Calculate time savings: 20 hrs/week × 50 weeks = 1,000 hrs = $50k/year → ROI: Huge → Timeline: 30-60 days 3. GROWTH BLOCKER Signal: "We can't scale because [reason]" Problem: Current setup can't support growth Opportunity: Enable growth with your solution Timeline: Urgent (growth is happening now) Approach: Growth strategy, capacity planning Example: "We can't onboard more clients because we can't manage them" → Your solution supports unlimited clients → Calculate revenue impact: Each client = $10k/year → For every 10 clients: $100k new revenue → Timeline: URGENT - do this month 4. COMPETITIVE THREAT Signal: "Competitor X has feature Y" Problem: Falling behind in market Opportunity: Close gap with your solution Timeline: Medium urgency Approach: Competitive comparison, feature roadmap Example: "Competitor is offering integration we don't have" → Your solution has that integration → Risk: Losing customers to competitor → Timeline: 6-8 weeks to close gap 5. TEAM/WORKFLOW IMPROVEMENT Signal: "Our team would work better if [feature]" Problem: Sub
Related in Sales & CRM
process-mapper
IncludedUse when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being worked, and quantify the gap between processing time and total elapsed time. Pairs Lean / Six Sigma / Theory-of-Constraints canon with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a process map, a ranked bottleneck list (with severity + root-cause hypothesis), and a cycle-time analysis (P50, P90, value-add ratio, Little's-Law throughput). Distinct from sales-pipeline, system-reliability (SLO), and strategic-OKR work — this is tactical process documentation for internal operations.
payment-integration
IncludedIntegrate payments with SePay (VietQR), Polar, Stripe, Paddle (MoR subscriptions), Creem.io (licensing). Checkout, webhooks, subscriptions, QR codes, multi-provider orders.
customer-success-manager
IncludedMonitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success
sales-engineer
IncludedAnalyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.
customer-success-manager
IncludedMonitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success
sales-engineer
IncludedAnalyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.