price-target-consensus
Retrieve consensus price targets for any stock using Octagon MCP. Use when you need the average, median, high, and low analyst price targets to evaluate upside/downside potential and analyst agreement.
What this skill does
# Price Target Consensus
Retrieve consensus price target metrics including average, median, high, and low targets using the Octagon MCP server.
## Prerequisites
Ensure Octagon MCP is configured in your AI agent (Cursor, Claude Desktop, Windsurf, etc.). See [references/mcp-setup.md](references/mcp-setup.md) for installation instructions.
## Workflow
### 1. Identify the Stock
Determine the ticker symbol for the company you want to analyze (e.g., AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL).
### 2. Execute Query via Octagon MCP
Use the `octagon-agent` tool with a natural language prompt:
```
Retrieve consensus price targets for the stock symbol <TICKER>.
```
**MCP Call Format:**
```json
{
"server": "octagon-mcp",
"toolName": "octagon-agent",
"arguments": {
"prompt": "Retrieve consensus price targets for the stock symbol AAPL."
}
}
```
### 3. Expected Output
The agent returns consensus price target data:
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Consensus Target | $303.11 |
| Median Target | $315.00 |
| Target High | $350.00 |
| Target Low | $220.00 |
**Data Sources**: octagon-stock-data-agent
### 4. Interpret Results
See [references/interpreting-results.md](references/interpreting-results.md) for guidance on:
- Understanding consensus vs. median
- Analyzing the target range
- Calculating upside/downside
- Evaluating analyst agreement
## Example Queries
**Basic Query:**
```
Retrieve consensus price targets for the stock symbol AAPL.
```
**With Price Context:**
```
What is the consensus price target for TSLA and how does it compare to current price?
```
**Range Focus:**
```
What are the highest and lowest analyst price targets for NVDA?
```
**Comparison:**
```
Compare consensus price targets for AAPL, MSFT, and GOOGL.
```
**Upside Analysis:**
```
What upside does the consensus target imply for AMZN?
```
## Understanding the Metrics
### Consensus Target
| Aspect | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| Definition | Average of all analyst targets |
| Calculation | Sum of targets / Number of analysts |
| Use | General market expectation |
| Limitation | Skewed by outliers |
### Median Target
| Aspect | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| Definition | Middle value of all targets |
| Calculation | 50th percentile |
| Use | Central tendency, outlier-resistant |
| Advantage | Less affected by extremes |
### Target High
| Aspect | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| Definition | Most bullish analyst target |
| Represents | Best-case scenario |
| Use | Maximum upside potential |
| Caution | May be overly optimistic |
### Target Low
| Aspect | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| Definition | Most bearish analyst target |
| Represents | Worst-case scenario |
| Use | Downside risk assessment |
| Caution | May be overly pessimistic |
## Calculating Potential
### Upside/Downside Formulas
```
Consensus Upside = (Consensus Target - Current Price) / Current Price × 100%
Maximum Upside = (Target High - Current Price) / Current Price × 100%
Downside Risk = (Target Low - Current Price) / Current Price × 100%
```
### Example Calculations
If AAPL trades at $270.01:
| Metric | Target | Potential |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Consensus | $303.11 | +12.3% upside |
| Median | $315.00 | +16.7% upside |
| High | $350.00 | +29.6% upside |
| Low | $220.00 | -18.5% downside |
## Range Analysis
### Spread Calculation
```
Range = Target High - Target Low
Spread % = Range / Consensus Target × 100%
```
### Interpreting Spread
| Spread % | Interpretation |
|----------|----------------|
| <20% | Strong consensus |
| 20-40% | Normal range |
| 40-60% | Moderate disagreement |
| >60% | High uncertainty |
### Example Range Analysis
From AAPL data:
- High: $350.00
- Low: $220.00
- Range: $130.00
- Consensus: $303.11
- Spread: 42.9%
**Interpretation**: Moderate disagreement among analysts, with significant difference between bulls and bears.
## Consensus vs. Median
### When to Use Each
| Scenario | Prefer |
|----------|--------|
| Normal distribution | Consensus (average) |
| Outliers present | Median |
| Skewed targets | Median |
| General expectation | Consensus |
### Identifying Skew
| Condition | Indicates |
|-----------|-----------|
| Consensus > Median | Right skew (bullish outliers) |
| Consensus < Median | Left skew (bearish outliers) |
| Consensus ≈ Median | Symmetric distribution |
### Example
From AAPL data:
- Consensus: $303.11
- Median: $315.00
- Consensus < Median → Left skew (some bearish outliers pulling average down)
## Bull vs. Bear Cases
### Understanding Extremes
| Target | Represents |
|--------|------------|
| High | Bull case assumptions |
| Low | Bear case assumptions |
| Gap | Range of outcomes |
### Scenario Analysis
| Scenario | Assumptions |
|----------|-------------|
| Bull Case | Strong growth, expanding margins, favorable macro |
| Base Case | Consensus expectations |
| Bear Case | Challenges, competition, risks materialize |
## Practical Applications
### Investment Decision
| Finding | Consideration |
|---------|---------------|
| Price < Low Target | Potential deep value or concerns |
| Price near Consensus | Fairly valued |
| Price > High Target | Potentially overvalued |
### Risk Assessment
| Metric | Use For |
|--------|---------|
| Downside to Low | Worst-case loss |
| Upside to High | Best-case gain |
| Risk/Reward | Low upside / High downside |
### Position Sizing
| Consensus View | Position Approach |
|----------------|-------------------|
| Strong upside, tight range | Larger position |
| Moderate upside, wide range | Standard position |
| Limited upside, wide range | Smaller position |
## Common Use Cases
### Quick Valuation Check
```
Is AAPL fairly valued based on analyst targets?
```
### Upside Screening
```
Which tech stocks have the highest consensus upside?
```
### Risk Assessment
```
What's the downside risk to the lowest analyst target for TSLA?
```
### Sentiment Check
```
How wide is the range between bull and bear cases for NVDA?
```
## Analysis Tips
1. **Compare to current price**: Calculate actual upside/downside.
2. **Use median when skewed**: More reliable central tendency.
3. **Analyze the range**: Wide = uncertainty, tight = agreement.
4. **Consider timing**: Targets are typically 12-month forward.
5. **Track changes**: Rising consensus = improving sentiment.
6. **Combine with fundamentals**: Targets are opinions, verify with data.
## Integration with Other Skills
| Skill | Combined Use |
|-------|--------------|
| stock-quote | Current price for potential calculation |
| price-target-summary | Historical target trends |
| analyst-estimates | Earnings behind the targets |
| financial-metrics-analysis | Fundamental validation |
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.