price-target-summary
Retrieve analysts' price target summary for any stock using Octagon MCP. Use when evaluating analyst sentiment, upside/downside potential, consensus expectations, and tracking target trends over time.
What this skill does
# Price Target Summary
Retrieve aggregated analyst price target data across multiple timeframes using the Octagon MCP server.
## Prerequisites
Ensure Octagon MCP is configured in your AI agent (Cursor, Claude Desktop, Windsurf, etc.). See [references/mcp-setup.md](references/mcp-setup.md) for installation instructions.
## Workflow
### 1. Identify the Stock
Determine the ticker symbol for the company you want to analyze (e.g., AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL).
### 2. Execute Query via Octagon MCP
Use the `octagon-agent` tool with a natural language prompt:
```
Retrieve the analysts' price-target summary for the stock symbol <TICKER>.
```
**MCP Call Format:**
```json
{
"server": "octagon-mcp",
"toolName": "octagon-agent",
"arguments": {
"prompt": "Retrieve the analysts' price-target summary for the stock symbol AAPL."
}
}
```
### 3. Expected Output
The agent returns price target data across timeframes:
| Timeframe | Number of Analysts | Average Price Target |
|-----------|-------------------|---------------------|
| Last Month | 9 | $305.72 |
| Last Quarter | 16 | $312.80 |
| Last Year | 48 | $282.91 |
| All Time | 229 | $219.71 |
**Key Insights**: Trend analysis comparing timeframes
**Data Sources**: octagon-stock-data-agent (aggregating StreetInsider, TheFly, Benzinga, etc.)
### 4. Interpret Results
See [references/interpreting-results.md](references/interpreting-results.md) for guidance on:
- Analyzing target trends
- Calculating upside/downside potential
- Understanding analyst coverage
- Evaluating consensus strength
## Example Queries
**Basic Query:**
```
Retrieve the analysts' price-target summary for the stock symbol AAPL.
```
**With Current Price Context:**
```
What are the analyst price targets for TSLA compared to its current price?
```
**Trend Focus:**
```
How have analyst price targets for NVDA changed over the past year?
```
**Coverage Analysis:**
```
How many analysts cover Microsoft and what are their price targets?
```
**Range Request:**
```
What are the highest and lowest analyst price targets for AMZN?
```
## Understanding Price Targets
### What Price Targets Represent
| Aspect | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| Definition | Analyst's expected stock price |
| Timeframe | Typically 12 months forward |
| Basis | Fundamental and technical analysis |
| Purpose | Guide for fair value |
### Types of Price Targets
| Type | Description |
|------|-------------|
| Average | Mean of all targets |
| Median | Middle value |
| High | Most bullish target |
| Low | Most bearish target |
| Consensus | Weighted average |
## Timeframe Analysis
### Understanding Timeframes
| Timeframe | What It Shows |
|-----------|---------------|
| Last Month | Most recent sentiment |
| Last Quarter | Near-term trend |
| Last Year | Annual evolution |
| All Time | Historical context |
### Trend Interpretation
| Pattern | Interpretation |
|---------|----------------|
| Rising targets | Growing optimism |
| Falling targets | Increasing concern |
| Stable targets | Consensus maintained |
| Diverging targets | Uncertainty/debate |
## Calculating Potential
### Upside/Downside
```
Upside = (Target Price - Current Price) / Current Price × 100%
```
### Example Calculation
- Current Price: $270.01
- Average Target: $312.80
- Upside: ($312.80 - $270.01) / $270.01 = 15.8%
### Interpreting Potential
| Upside | Interpretation |
|--------|----------------|
| >20% | Significant upside expected |
| 10-20% | Moderate upside |
| 0-10% | Near fair value |
| <0% | Downside risk |
## Analyst Coverage
### Coverage Levels
| Analysts | Coverage Level |
|----------|----------------|
| 30+ | Heavily covered |
| 15-30 | Well covered |
| 5-15 | Moderate coverage |
| <5 | Limited coverage |
### Coverage Implications
| Level | Characteristics |
|-------|-----------------|
| Heavy | More consensus reliability |
| Moderate | Good perspective diversity |
| Light | Less reliable consensus |
| Minimal | Limited institutional interest |
## Consensus Strength
### Evaluating Consensus
| Factor | Strong Consensus | Weak Consensus |
|--------|------------------|----------------|
| Range | Tight (low to high) | Wide spread |
| Recent Changes | Aligned direction | Mixed revisions |
| Analyst Count | Many participants | Few analysts |
### Standard Deviation
| Spread | Interpretation |
|--------|----------------|
| Narrow | High agreement |
| Moderate | Normal debate |
| Wide | Significant disagreement |
## Target Revisions
### Revision Trends
| Pattern | Signal |
|---------|--------|
| Upgrades increasing | Improving outlook |
| Downgrades increasing | Deteriorating outlook |
| Mixed revisions | Uncertainty |
| No changes | Status quo |
### Revision Triggers
| Catalyst | Common Result |
|----------|---------------|
| Strong earnings | Target increases |
| Weak earnings | Target decreases |
| Guidance change | Aligned revision |
| Sector news | Coordinated moves |
## Data Sources
### Common Publishers
| Source | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| StreetInsider | Financial news aggregator |
| TheFly | Real-time news |
| Benzinga | Market intelligence |
| Sell-side Firms | Investment bank research |
### Source Considerations
| Factor | Note |
|--------|------|
| Timeliness | Recent targets more relevant |
| Reputation | Weight by analyst track record |
| Conflicts | Consider investment banking ties |
| Methodology | Different valuation approaches |
## Common Use Cases
### Investment Decision
```
Should I buy AAPL based on analyst targets?
```
### Valuation Check
```
Is MSFT overvalued relative to analyst expectations?
```
### Sentiment Tracking
```
How has analyst sentiment on GOOGL changed this year?
```
### Peer Comparison
```
Compare analyst targets for major cloud stocks.
```
## Analysis Tips
1. **Compare to current price**: Calculate upside/downside potential.
2. **Track trend direction**: Rising or falling targets over time.
3. **Consider coverage**: More analysts = more reliable consensus.
4. **Check range**: Tight = agreement, wide = uncertainty.
5. **Time weight**: Recent targets more relevant.
6. **Use with fundamentals**: Targets are opinions, not facts.
## Integration with Other Skills
| Skill | Combined Use |
|-------|--------------|
| stock-quote | Current price vs. target |
| analyst-estimates | Targets + earnings expectations |
| income-statement | Fundamentals behind targets |
| stock-performance | Price trend vs. target evolution |
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.