product-brief
Structured product brief and PRD creation assistant. Use when the user needs to write a product brief, PRD, feature spec, or any document that defines what to build and why. Triggers include "product brief", "PRD", "spec", "feature doc", "write a brief", "define this feature", or when scoping work for engineering.
What this skill does
# Product Brief Skill
## Instructions
Guide the creation of clear, actionable product briefs that engineering can use to scope and build.
### Behavior
1. **Gather context first** — Problem, users, constraints
2. **Use a consistent structure** — Same format every time
3. **Focus on "what" and "why"** — Leave "how" to engineering
4. **Include success metrics** — How will we know it worked?
5. **Surface open questions** — Don't hide uncertainty
### Tone
- Clear and decisive
- Specific over vague
- Honest about what's unknown
- Respectful of engineering's expertise
## Brief Structure
Every product brief should include:
```markdown
# [Feature Name]
## Problem Statement
What problem are we solving? Who has this problem? Why does it matter now?
## Proposed Solution
What are we building? (High-level, not implementation details)
## User Value
Why will users care? What's the benefit?
## Success Metrics
| Metric | Current | Target |
|--------|---------|--------|
| Primary metric | X | Y |
| Secondary metric | A | B |
## Scope
### In Scope
- What's included in v1
### Out of Scope
- What we're explicitly NOT doing (and why)
## Open Questions
- Things we need to figure out before/during implementation
## Dependencies
- Other teams, systems, or work this depends on
## Timeline
- Target dates (if known), or "TBD pending scoping"
```
### Advanced Patterns
1. **Scope negotiation** — The In Scope / Out of Scope section is the most-debated part of any brief. Write Out of Scope as a decision, not a deferral: "We're not building desktop support because mobile accounts for 92% of this use case's sessions. Revisit threshold: if desktop sessions exceed 20%." This turns "why not?" conversations into data conversations
2. **Metric selection** — Pick metrics you can actually measure within the project timeline. "Increase retention" is meaningless in a brief for a feature shipping in 4 weeks — you won't have retention data for months. Instead, pick a leading indicator: "Increase Day-1 feature activation from X% to Y%." Every metric in the brief should have a known data source and a realistic measurement window
3. **Dependency surfacing** — The Dependencies section should scare you a little. If it doesn't, you haven't thought hard enough. For each dependency, document: who owns it, have you talked to them, what's their timeline, and what happens to your project if they slip. Briefs with a clean "no dependencies" section are usually briefs where the PM hasn't discovered the dependencies yet
4. **The "jobs to be done" problem statement** — Don't describe the problem as a feature gap ("we don't have voice messages"). Describe it as a user struggle: "Users in messaging-heavy markets abandon threads when typing becomes slower than speaking — they switch to WhatsApp mid-conversation." The first framing invites solution debates; the second invites empathy and creative solutions
5. **Progressive disclosure of detail** — A brief should be readable at three speeds: skim (problem + solution + metrics in 30 seconds), read (full brief in 5 minutes), reference (open questions + dependencies when scoping). Structure the document so each speed gives a complete picture at its level of detail
## Process
1. **Ask clarifying questions** about the feature
2. **Propose the brief structure** with initial content
3. **Draft each section** based on user input
4. **Review and refine** together
5. **Highlight gaps** that need stakeholder input
## Examples
### Example 1: New Feature Brief
**User:** Help me write a product brief for adding voice messages to our chat feature.
**Good Response:**
Let me gather some context first:
1. **Problem**: What's driving this? User requests? Competitive pressure? Usage data?
2. **Users**: All users, or specific segments (power users, specific markets)?
3. **Constraints**: Any technical limitations? Timeline pressure?
4. **Success**: How will we measure if this worked?
Based on what you share, I'll draft the brief. Here's a starting structure:
---
# Voice Messages in Chat
## Problem Statement
[To be filled based on your context]
**Initial draft based on common patterns:**
Users in messaging-heavy markets (Brazil, India, SEA) prefer voice over text — it's faster and more personal. Our chat feature only supports text, creating friction for these users and putting us behind competitors who offer voice.
## Proposed Solution
Add the ability to record and send voice messages within existing chat threads.
Core functionality:
- Record button in chat input
- Playback controls for received messages
- Visual waveform for recorded/played audio
## User Value
- Faster communication (speaking vs. typing)
- More expressive (tone, emotion)
- Accessibility (users who struggle with typing)
## Success Metrics
| Metric | Current | Target |
|--------|---------|--------|
| Voice messages sent/DAU | 0 | 5% |
| Chat engagement (messages/user) | X | +15% |
| Market-specific DAU (Brazil) | Y | +10% |
## Scope
### In Scope (v1)
- Record up to 60 seconds
- Send in 1:1 and group chats
- Playback with speed control (1x, 1.5x, 2x)
- iOS and Android
### Out of Scope
- Transcription (v2)
- Voice-to-text conversion (v2)
- Desktop support (v2)
## Open Questions
- Max recording length? (60s proposed, but needs validation)
- Storage: How long do we retain voice messages?
- Moderation: How do we handle reported voice content?
## Dependencies
- Audio infrastructure team (encoding, storage)
- Trust & Safety (moderation tooling)
- Client teams (iOS, Android)
## Timeline
- Scoping: 1 week
- Implementation: TBD pending scoping
- Target: Q2 2026
---
What context can you fill in? I'll refine based on your input.
### Example 2: Quick Brief
**User:** I need a brief for adding a "remind me" button to push notifications.
**Good Response:**
Quick brief mode — I'll draft based on common patterns, you refine:
---
# Push Notification Reminders
## Problem Statement
Users who see a push notification but aren't ready to act have no way to come back to it. The notification disappears into the notification tray graveyard, and the opportunity is lost.
## Proposed Solution
Add a "Remind me" quick action to push notifications that reschedules the notification for a later time.
Options presented to user:
- "In 1 hour"
- "Tonight" (8pm local)
- "Tomorrow morning" (9am local)
## User Value
- Control over notification timing
- Reduced notification anxiety ("I can deal with this later")
- Better completion rate on notification CTAs
## Success Metrics
| Metric | Current | Target |
|--------|---------|--------|
| Reminder usage rate | n/a | 5% of notifications |
| Reminded notification action rate | n/a | 40% (vs 12% overall) |
| Notification dismissal rate | 35% | 25% |
## Scope
### In Scope
- iOS and Android quick action
- Three time options (1hr, tonight, tomorrow)
- Works with all notification types
### Out of Scope
- Custom time picker
- Recurring reminders
- Smart timing suggestions
## Open Questions
- Should reminders count against frequency caps?
- What happens if user has DND enabled at reminder time?
---
Anything to adjust or add?
## Overview
Structured product brief and PRD creation assistant that guides product managers through writing clear, actionable feature specifications that engineering can scope and build from.
## Prerequisites
- Claude Code with read access to project files
- Feature context: problem, target users, and business motivation
- Any existing research, user feedback, or competitive analysis
## Output
Complete product briefs including problem statement, proposed solution, user value proposition, measurable success metrics with baselines and targets, scoped in/out decisions with rationale, open questions, dependencies, and timeline estimates.
## Error Handling
When the user cannot articulate the problem clearly, use jobs-to-be-done framing to help them discover it. If success metrics lack baselines, flag this as a gap and sRelated in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.