product-design
Design MVPs for web, mobile, and SaaS applications through adaptive interviews that achieve buildable clarity. Use when a user wants to define, scope, or document an application idea, or when they mention MVP, product requirements, PRD, app idea, or need help turning a concept into something implementable.
What this skill does
# Product Design
Interview users to extract implementation-ready requirements, then produce a PRD with enough detail to build with minimal ambiguity.
## Interview Workflow
### Phase 1: Core Concept (always)
Start here. Get the essential shape of the product.
1. **What is it?** One sentence describing what the app does
2. **Who uses it?** Primary user roles (2-4 max for MVP)
3. **Core actions?** What can each role do? (aim for 3-5 key actions per role)
4. **Platform?** Web, mobile, both? Any platform constraints?
Exit when: You can explain the app to someone in 30 seconds.
### Phase 2: User Scenarios (always)
For each role, define concrete scenarios at the feature level.
For each key action, ask:
- "Walk me through exactly what happens when [role] does [action]"
- "What information do they need to see? What do they input?"
- "What happens after? Where do they end up?"
Probe for edge cases:
- "What if [input is missing/invalid]?"
- "What if [user cancels midway]?"
- "Are there limits? (max items, required fields, etc.)"
Exit when: You could sketch every screen and know what each button does.
### Phase 3: Technical Context (always)
Nail down the tech stack. The PRD should specify exactly what to build with.
| Topic | Key questions |
|-------|---------------|
| **Frontend** | Web app, mobile (React Native, Flutter, native), or both? Which framework (React, Vue, Next.js, etc.)? |
| **Backend** | BaaS (Supabase, Firebase, Convex)? Custom API (Node, Python, Go)? Serverless functions? |
| **Database** | Postgres, MongoDB, SQLite? Managed by BaaS or self-hosted? |
| **Deployment** | Vercel, Netlify, Railway, Fly.io? App stores for mobile? |
| **Auth** | Built-in (Supabase Auth, Firebase Auth)? Third-party (Auth0, Clerk)? Social providers needed? |
| **Integrations** | Which external services? What data flows between? |
| **Payments** | Stripe, RevenueCat? Subscription vs one-time? |
| **Notifications** | Email (Resend, SendGrid)? Push? What triggers them? |
| **Files/Media** | Upload types? Size limits? Storage (S3, Supabase Storage, Cloudinary)? |
Exit when: You could set up the project and install dependencies with no ambiguity.
### Phase 4: Scope Boundaries (always)
Explicitly define the MVP boundary.
Ask:
- "What's the one thing this MVP absolutely must do well?"
- "What features are you tempted to include but could wait for v2?"
- "Any hard constraints? (timeline, budget, must use X technology)"
Create explicit IN/OUT lists. Push back on scope creep:
- "That sounds like a v2 feature. For MVP, could we [simpler alternative]?"
Exit when: Clear line between MVP and future work.
### Interview Principles
**Go deeper when:**
- Answer is vague ("users can manage their stuff")
- Multiple interpretations possible
- Edge cases not addressed
- Implementation would require guessing
**Move on when:**
- Answer is concrete and specific
- You could write the code/design the screen
- Edge cases covered or explicitly deferred
**Phrase questions as:**
- "Walk me through..." (gets concrete steps)
- "What exactly happens when..." (forces specificity)
- "Show me an example of..." (grounds in reality)
- "What if..." (surfaces edge cases)
## PRD Template
After the interview, produce this document:
```markdown
# [Product Name] - MVP PRD
## Overview
[2-3 sentences: what it is, who it's for, core value proposition]
## Roles
| Role | Description | Key Permissions |
|------|-------------|-----------------|
| [Role 1] | [Who they are] | [What they can do] |
## User Scenarios
### [Scenario Name]
**Role:** [Which role]
**Goal:** [What they're trying to accomplish]
**Flow:**
1. [Step with specific UI/action]
2. [Next step]
3. [Outcome]
**Edge Cases:**
- [Edge case]: [How it's handled]
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion]
- [ ] [Another criterion]
[Repeat for each scenario]
## Scope
### In Scope (MVP)
- [Feature/capability 1]
- [Feature/capability 2]
### Out of Scope (Future)
- [Deferred feature 1] - [brief reason why deferred]
- [Deferred feature 2]
## Technical Context
### Tech Stack
| Layer | Choice | Notes |
|-------|--------|-------|
| **Frontend** | [Framework - e.g., Next.js, React Native] | [Any specific libraries] |
| **Backend** | [e.g., Supabase, custom Node API] | [Architecture notes] |
| **Database** | [e.g., Postgres via Supabase] | [Key considerations] |
| **Auth** | [e.g., Supabase Auth with Google] | [Providers needed] |
| **Deployment** | [e.g., Vercel, App Store] | [Environments] |
### Integrations
| Service | Purpose | Data Flow |
|---------|---------|-----------|
| [Service] | [Why needed] | [What data, which direction] |
### Key Entities
[Only if helpful - brief description of core data objects and relationships]
### Constraints
- [Any technical constraints, required technologies, etc.]
## Open Questions
- [Any unresolved items that need answers before/during implementation]
```
### Before Generating
Before writing the PRD, confirm with the user:
- Summarize what you've learned from the interview
- Ask if they're ready to generate the PRD or if anything needs clarification
- Write the PRD to `docs/PRD.md` (create the directory if needed)
## Workflow Summary
```
START
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 1: Core Concept │ ◄── Always. Get the 30-second pitch.
└──────────┬──────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 2: User Scenarios │ ◄── Always. Could you sketch every screen?
└──────────┬──────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 3: Technical Ctx │ ◄── Always. Nail down the tech stack.
└──────────┬──────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 4: Scope Boundary │ ◄── Always. Clear MVP vs future line.
└──────────┬──────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ Confirm with user │ ◄── Ask if ready to generate PRD
└──────────┬──────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ Generate PRD │ ◄── Write to docs/PRD.md
└─────────────────────────┘
```
## Exit Criteria
Ready to produce PRD when ALL are true:
- [ ] Can explain the app in 30 seconds
- [ ] Could sketch every screen for MVP
- [ ] Know what every button/action does
- [ ] Edge cases addressed or explicitly deferred
- [ ] Clear MVP boundary established
- [ ] Tech stack fully specified (frontend, backend, database, auth, deployment)
- [ ] No technical unknowns that block implementation
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.