product-requirements-designer
Comprehensive product requirements documentation from problem definition through launch planning. Supports both enterprise PRD (full specs, cross-functional alignment) and lean/startup style (hypothesis-driven one-pagers). Framework-agnostic with templates for Agile, Jobs-to-Be-Done, and hybrid approaches. Scaffolds related artifacts including user stories, acceptance criteria, wireframes brief, and technical handoff specs. Triggers on PRD creation, product specs, feature requirements, or product design documentation.
What this skill does
# Product Requirements Designer Transform product vision into actionable specifications. ## Mode Selection ### Document Scope **Enterprise PRD**: Full cross-functional specification - Complete problem analysis with market context - Detailed functional and non-functional requirements - Success metrics with measurement plans - Risk assessment and mitigation - Full launch and rollout plan - Stakeholder sign-off sections **Lean PRD**: Hypothesis-driven one-pager - Problem/opportunity statement - Proposed solution with key assumptions - MVP scope and success criteria - Learning goals and experiment design - Quick iteration plan ### Framework Selection **Agile/Scrum**: Epics → Features → User Stories → Acceptance Criteria **Jobs-to-Be-Done**: Job statement → Forces diagram → Solution mapping **Outcome-Driven**: Desired outcomes → Opportunity scoring → Solution requirements **Hybrid**: Mix frameworks based on product stage and team needs --- ## Enterprise PRD Structure ### 1. Executive Summary - Product/feature name - One-paragraph description - Primary stakeholders - Target release - Document status and version ### 2. Problem Definition #### 2.1 Problem Statement ``` [User type] experiences [problem] when trying to [goal], which results in [negative outcome]. ``` #### 2.2 Evidence | Evidence Type | Source | Finding | |---------------|--------|---------| | User research | [Study/interviews] | [Key insight] | | Analytics | [Data source] | [Metric showing problem] | | Support data | [Tickets/feedback] | [Pattern identified] | | Market research | [Source] | [Competitive gap] | #### 2.3 Impact of Not Solving - Business impact: [Revenue, churn, efficiency] - User impact: [Frustration, abandonment, workarounds] - Strategic impact: [Market position, competitive threat] ### 3. Goals and Success Metrics #### 3.1 Business Goals | Goal | Metric | Current | Target | Timeline | |------|--------|---------|--------|----------| | [Goal] | [KPI] | [Baseline] | [Target] | [By when] | #### 3.2 User Goals | User Segment | Goal | Success Indicator | |--------------|------|-------------------| | [Segment] | [What they want to achieve] | [How we know they succeeded] | #### 3.3 Success Metrics (HEART Framework) - **Happiness**: [User satisfaction measure] - **Engagement**: [Usage depth measure] - **Adoption**: [New user/feature uptake] - **Retention**: [Return usage measure] - **Task Success**: [Completion rate, time, errors] ### 4. User Analysis #### 4.1 Target Users | Persona | Description | Primary Need | Usage Context | |---------|-------------|--------------|---------------| | [Name] | [Who they are] | [Core need] | [When/where/how] | #### 4.2 User Journey (Current State) ``` [Trigger] → [Step 1] → [Pain Point] → [Step 2] → [Pain Point] → [Outcome] ``` #### 4.3 User Journey (Future State) ``` [Trigger] → [Improved Step 1] → [Step 2] → [Desired Outcome] ``` ### 5. Solution Overview #### 5.1 Proposed Solution [High-level description of what we're building] #### 5.2 Key Capabilities 1. [Capability 1]: [What it enables] 2. [Capability 2]: [What it enables] 3. [Capability 3]: [What it enables] #### 5.3 Solution Principles - [Principle 1]: [Why it matters] - [Principle 2]: [Why it matters] #### 5.4 Out of Scope - [Explicitly excluded item 1] - [Explicitly excluded item 2] ### 6. Detailed Requirements #### 6.1 Functional Requirements | ID | Requirement | Priority | Rationale | |----|-------------|----------|-----------| | FR-001 | [System shall...] | P0/P1/P2 | [Why needed] | | FR-002 | [System shall...] | P0/P1/P2 | [Why needed] | **Priority Definitions**: - P0: Must have for launch (blocking) - P1: Should have for launch (significant value) - P2: Nice to have (incremental value) #### 6.2 Non-Functional Requirements | Category | Requirement | Target | Rationale | |----------|-------------|--------|-----------| | Performance | [Response time, throughput] | [Specific target] | [Why] | | Scalability | [Load, growth capacity] | [Specific target] | [Why] | | Security | [Auth, data protection] | [Standard/compliance] | [Why] | | Accessibility | [WCAG level, devices] | [Specific target] | [Why] | | Reliability | [Uptime, recovery] | [Specific target] | [Why] | #### 6.3 Constraints - Technical: [Platform, integration, legacy constraints] - Business: [Budget, timeline, resource constraints] - Regulatory: [Compliance, legal constraints] ### 7. User Experience #### 7.1 UX Principles for This Feature 1. [Principle]: [Application] 2. [Principle]: [Application] #### 7.2 Key Interactions | Interaction | User Action | System Response | Success State | |-------------|-------------|-----------------|---------------| | [Name] | [What user does] | [What happens] | [Result] | #### 7.3 Edge Cases and Error States | Scenario | Handling | User Message | |----------|----------|--------------| | [Edge case] | [How handled] | [What user sees] | ### 8. Technical Considerations #### 8.1 Architecture Impact - [System/component affected]: [Type of change] #### 8.2 Dependencies | Dependency | Type | Owner | Status | |------------|------|-------|--------| | [System/API/Team] | Blocking/Informational | [Who] | [Status] | #### 8.3 Data Requirements - New data entities: [List] - Data migrations: [Required/Not required] - Privacy considerations: [PII handling, retention] #### 8.4 Integration Points | System | Integration Type | Data Flow | |--------|------------------|-----------| | [System] | [API/Event/Batch] | [In/Out/Bidirectional] | ### 9. Risk Assessment | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | |------|------------|--------|------------| | [Risk description] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Mitigation plan] | ### 10. Launch Plan #### 10.1 Rollout Strategy - [ ] Internal dogfood: [Date] - [ ] Beta/Limited release: [Date, criteria] - [ ] General availability: [Date] #### 10.2 Feature Flags | Flag | Purpose | Default | Rollout Plan | |------|---------|---------|--------------| | [Flag name] | [What it controls] | Off/On | [% ramp plan] | #### 10.3 Success Criteria for Each Phase | Phase | Success Criteria | Go/No-Go Decision | |-------|------------------|-------------------| | Beta | [Criteria] | [Who decides] | | GA | [Criteria] | [Who decides] | #### 10.4 Rollback Plan [Conditions and process for rollback] ### 11. Cross-Functional Requirements #### 11.1 Marketing - Positioning: [Key message] - Launch activities: [Required support] #### 11.2 Sales/CS - Training needs: [What teams need to know] - Documentation: [Customer-facing docs needed] #### 11.3 Legal/Compliance - Reviews required: [List] - Approvals needed: [List] ### 12. Timeline and Milestones | Milestone | Date | Owner | Dependencies | |-----------|------|-------|--------------| | PRD approved | [Date] | [PM] | Stakeholder review | | Design complete | [Date] | [Design] | PRD | | Dev complete | [Date] | [Eng] | Design | | QA complete | [Date] | [QA] | Dev | | Launch | [Date] | [PM] | All | ### 13. Open Questions | Question | Owner | Due Date | Status | |----------|-------|----------|--------| | [Question] | [Who answers] | [When] | Open/Resolved | ### 14. Appendix - A: User Research Summary - B: Competitive Analysis - C: Technical Design Doc (link) - D: Design Specs (link) ### 15. Sign-Off | Role | Name | Date | Signature | |------|------|------|-----------| | Product | | | | | Engineering | | | | | Design | | | | | [Other stakeholders] | | | | --- ## Lean PRD Structure (One-Pager) ### Header **Feature**: [Name] **Owner**: [PM] **Date**: [Date] **Status**: Draft/In Review/Approved ### Problem [2-3 sentences: Who has the problem, what is it, why does it matter] ### Hypothesis ``` We believe that [solution/change] for [user segment] will achieve [outcome] We will know this is true when [measurable signal] ``` ### Proposed Solution [Brief description with key capabilities—keep to 3-5 bullets] ### Key Assumptions | Assumption | Risk if Wrong | How to Validate | |------------|--
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.