quality-assurance
Comprehensive testing and validation strategies for spec-driven development. Learn phase-specific validation techniques, quality gates, and testing approaches to ensure high-quality implementation.
What this skill does
# Quality Assurance
Ensure quality throughout the spec-driven development process with validation techniques, quality gates, and testing strategies.
## When to Use This Skill
Use quality assurance practices when:
- Completing any spec phase (requirements, design, tasks)
- Transitioning between phases
- Implementing features from specs
- Reviewing completed work
- Establishing team quality standards
## Core Principles
1. **Requirements-Driven Testing:** Every test traces to a requirement
2. **Phase-Appropriate Validation:** Different techniques for each phase
3. **Continuous Quality:** Checks throughout development
4. **Automated Where Possible:** Reduce manual effort
5. **Fast Feedback:** Catch issues early
## Phase-Specific Validation
### Requirements Phase Validation
**Quality Checklist:**
- [ ] All user stories have acceptance criteria
- [ ] Requirements are unambiguous and specific
- [ ] Each requirement can be validated/tested
- [ ] EARS format used consistently
- [ ] Requirements link to business objectives
- [ ] No conflicting requirements
**Review Process:**
1. **Self Review:** Author checks completeness
2. **Stakeholder Review:** Business validates requirements
3. **Technical Review:** Team assesses feasibility
4. **Approval:** Formal sign-off before design
**Validation Techniques:**
- **Scenario Walkthroughs:** Step through user journeys
- **Edge Case Analysis:** Identify boundary conditions
- **Conflict Detection:** Check for contradictions
- **Completeness Analysis:** Ensure all needs covered
### Design Phase Validation
**Quality Checklist:**
- [ ] Design addresses all requirements
- [ ] Scalability considerations documented
- [ ] Maintainability assessed
- [ ] Security addressed
- [ ] Performance requirements considered
- [ ] External integrations defined
**Review Process:**
1. **Architecture Review:** Senior team validates design
2. **Security Review:** Security implications assessed
3. **Performance Review:** Performance characteristics evaluated
4. **Integration Review:** External dependencies validated
**Validation Techniques:**
- **Design Walkthroughs:** Step through system interactions
- **Threat Modeling:** Identify security vulnerabilities
- **Performance Modeling:** Estimate system performance
- **Dependency Analysis:** Map external requirements
### Tasks Phase Validation
**Quality Checklist:**
- [ ] Each task has clear deliverables
- [ ] Task sequence is logical
- [ ] All design elements covered
- [ ] Each task can be validated
- [ ] Tasks appropriately sized (2-4 hours)
- [ ] Dependencies clearly defined
**Review Process:**
1. **Completeness Review:** All design elements have tasks
2. **Sequencing Review:** Task order is logical
3. **Scope Review:** Tasks are appropriately sized
4. **Dependency Review:** Dependencies clear
## Quality Gates
### Requirements Phase Exit Criteria
- [ ] All user stories follow proper format
- [ ] Acceptance criteria use EARS format
- [ ] Requirements are testable and measurable
- [ ] No conflicting requirements
- [ ] Stakeholders have approved
- [ ] Edge cases documented
### Design Phase Exit Criteria
- [ ] Architecture addresses all requirements
- [ ] Non-functional requirements addressed
- [ ] External dependencies identified
- [ ] Data models clearly defined
- [ ] Error handling documented
- [ ] Security considerations addressed
- [ ] Technical review completed
### Tasks Phase Exit Criteria
- [ ] All design elements have tasks
- [ ] Tasks properly sequenced
- [ ] Each task is actionable
- [ ] Requirements references included
- [ ] Test approach defined
- [ ] Task breakdown reviewed
### Task-Level Quality Gates
**Before Starting:**
- [ ] Task requirements understood
- [ ] Test strategy defined
- [ ] Dependencies available
- [ ] Environment ready
**During Implementation:**
- [ ] Code follows standards
- [ ] Tests written alongside code
- [ ] Coverage meets thresholds (80%+)
- [ ] No critical vulnerabilities
**Before Marking Complete:**
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] Code review completed
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] Requirements validated
## Testing Strategies
### Test Pyramid
```
/\
/ \ E2E Tests (10%)
/____\ Integration Tests (20%)
/ \
/________\ Unit Tests (70%)
```
### Unit Testing
- Fast execution (< 1 second per test)
- Test individual functions/classes
- Mock external dependencies
- Target 80%+ coverage
### Integration Testing
- Test component interactions
- Use real dependencies where practical
- Validate API contracts
- Test critical workflows
### End-to-End Testing
- Test complete user journeys
- Production-like environment
- Focus on critical business flows
- Minimal but comprehensive
### Test-Driven Development
For each task:
1. **Write tests first** based on acceptance criteria
2. **Run tests** - verify they fail (red)
3. **Write code** - minimal to pass tests (green)
4. **Refactor** - improve while keeping tests green
5. **Validate** - ensure requirements satisfied
## Quality Metrics
### Code Quality
- **Line Coverage:** % of code lines executed
- **Branch Coverage:** % of code branches tested
- **Cyclomatic Complexity:** Code complexity
- **Technical Debt:** Accumulated issues
### Testing Effectiveness
- **Test Pass Rate:** % of tests passing
- **Execution Time:** Time to run tests
- **Defect Detection Rate:** Bugs found by tests vs production
- **Test Maintenance:** Time spent maintaining tests
## Common Quality Issues
### Flaky Tests
**Symptoms:** Tests pass/fail inconsistently
**Solutions:**
- Identify timing dependencies
- Use proper wait conditions
- Isolate test data
- Fix race conditions
### Slow Test Suites
**Symptoms:** Tests take too long
**Solutions:**
- Parallelize execution
- Optimize database operations
- Use test doubles for external services
- Profile and optimize slow tests
### Low Coverage
**Symptoms:** Insufficient code coverage
**Solutions:**
- Add tests for uncovered paths
- Focus on critical business logic
- Use mutation testing
- Set coverage gates in CI
### Test Maintenance Burden
**Symptoms:** Tests require frequent updates
**Solutions:**
- Improve test design
- Use page object patterns for UI
- Reduce coupling to implementation
- Regular test refactoring
## Validation Checklists
### Requirements Validation
```markdown
## Requirements Review
**Completeness:**
- [ ] All user roles addressed
- [ ] Happy path scenarios covered
- [ ] Edge cases documented
- [ ] Error cases handled
- [ ] Business rules captured
**Clarity:**
- [ ] Precise language used
- [ ] No ambiguous terms
- [ ] Technical jargon avoided
- [ ] Behaviors are specific
**Testability:**
- [ ] Each requirement verifiable
- [ ] Success criteria observable
- [ ] Inputs/outputs specified
```
### Design Validation
```markdown
## Design Review
**Architecture:**
- [ ] Requirements addressed
- [ ] Components well-defined
- [ ] Interfaces specified
- [ ] Data flow documented
**Quality Attributes:**
- [ ] Performance considered
- [ ] Security addressed
- [ ] Scalability planned
- [ ] Maintainability assessed
**Risks:**
- [ ] Single points of failure identified
- [ ] Bottlenecks documented
- [ ] Mitigations planned
```
### Implementation Validation
```markdown
## Implementation Review
**Code Quality:**
- [ ] Follows standards
- [ ] Well-documented
- [ ] Tests included
- [ ] No security issues
**Requirements:**
- [ ] All criteria met
- [ ] Edge cases handled
- [ ] Error handling complete
**Integration:**
- [ ] Works with existing code
- [ ] APIs functioning
- [ ] Performance acceptable
```
## Best Practices
### Testing Best Practices
1. Write tests first when possible
2. Each test verifies one thing
3. Use descriptive test names
4. Maintain test independence
5. Keep tests up-to-date
### Quality Assurance Best Practices
1. Find issues early (shift left)
2. Automate everything possible
3. Use metrics to drive improvements
4. Make quality everyone's responsibility
5. Continuous learning and improvement
### ProcesRelated in General
modeling-omnistudio-epc-catalog
IncludedSalesforce Industries CME EPC product-modeling skill for Product2-based catalog creation. Use when creating EPC products, configuring product attributes, building offer bundles with Product Child Items, or reviewing EPC DataPack JSON metadata for product catalog changes. TRIGGER when: user creates or updates Product2 EPC records, AttributeAssignment payloads, AttributeMetadata/AttributeDefaultValues, Offer bundles, or ProductChildItem relationships. DO NOT TRIGGER when: designing OmniScripts/FlexCards/Integration Procedures (use building-omnistudio-omniscript, building-omnistudio-flexcard, or building-omnistudio-integration-procedure), implementing Apex business logic (use generating-apex), or troubleshooting deployment pipelines (use deploying-metadata).
relationship-science-coach
IncludedUse this skill for direct, practical adult relationship coaching: couples conflict, repair, trust, marriage, dating, flirting, attachment patterns, emotional connection, sex, desire differences, eroticism, kink negotiation, affection, love languages, breakups, and long-term passion. Draw on Gottman, EFT and Hold Me Tight, attachment science, modern sex research, Perel, Nagoski, Kerner, Schnarch, Love and Stosny, and flexible love-language tools. Be concrete and low-hedge. Redirect only for imminent danger, abuse, coercive control, minors, non-consent, self-harm, stalking, or medical/legal/psychiatric decisions.
building-sf-integrations
IncludedSalesforce integration architecture and runtime plumbing with 120-point scoring. Use this skill to set up Named Credentials, External Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callout patterns, Platform Events, and Change Data Capture. TRIGGER when: user sets up Named Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callouts, Platform Events, CDC, or touches .namedCredential-meta.xml files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Connected App/OAuth config (use configuring-connected-apps), Apex-only logic (use generating-apex), or data import/export (use handling-sf-data).
venue-templates
IncludedAccess comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.
let-fate-decide
IncludedDraws the 12 Houses of the Zodiac Tarot spread to inject entropy into planning when prompts are vague, ambiguous, or casually delegated. Interprets the spread to guide next steps. Use when the user says 'let fate decide', 'YOLO', 'whatever', 'idk', or other nonchalant phrases, makes Yu-Gi-Oh references, or when you are about to arbitrarily pick between multiple reasonable approaches. Prefer over ask-questions-if-underspecified when the user's tone is casual or playful rather than precision-seeking.
net-ops
IncludedCross-platform network troubleshooting (Windows, macOS, Linux) via local or remote shell. Use for: DNS broken, can't resolve hostnames, nslookup/dig works but apps fail, NRPT, WFP, scutil, /etc/resolver, systemd-resolved, /etc/resolv.conf, NetworkManager, VPN DNS leak residue (ProtonVPN/Mullvad/WireGuard/AnyConnect), AV/firewall blocking DNS or DoH, Tailscale DNS interaction, intermittent connectivity, remote diagnostics over SSH.