quality-engineering-zephyr-test-generation
Generate Zephyr test cases from Jira stories: parse AC, identify platform and market, impact-analyze existing TCs (update vs create new), draft test cases with correct naming/metadata/preconditions, and link back via Create Test Case Issue Link. Use when converting a Jira story into Zephyr TCs, or when requirement changes require updating existing TCs rather than creating duplicates.
What this skill does
# Zephyr Test Generation Standards
## **Priority: P1 (HIGH)**
## Workflow: Jira → Zephyr
1. **Analyze Requirements**:
- Extract: Summary, ACs, Platform per AC row, Market, Components.
- Fetch Jira with `?expand=renderedFields` — HTML authoritative for platform colors:
`#00B8D9` = Web · `#36B37E` = Mobile · `#FF991F` = Web+Mobile
- See [Actor/Permission Matrix](../quality-engineering-business-analysis/references/analysis_patterns.md) for role/market logic.
2. **Impact Analysis** (run before any TC creation)
- **Step — Direct Lookup**: Call `Get Issue Link Test Cases` with Jira issue key (e.g., `{PROJECT}-{ID}`).
- **Step B — Supplemental**: If Step 0, search by `[Module]` and `[Screen]` keywords + check sibling issue links.
- See [Discovery Protocol](references/impact_analysis.md) for full chain.
- Map each AC to coverage status:
- **Covered** → ask user: skip or update to current format?
- **Partial** → always propose NEW TC.
- **Not Covered** → always create NEW TC.
3. **Draft Artifact**:
- Delete any existing `zephyr_test_plan.md` before writing.
- Follow 4-section format in [TC Format Reference](references/tc_format.md) exactly.
- After writing: read back file and print full content in chat so user can review without opening it.
- Ask for: review approval, handling of Covered ACs, and Zephyr Folder ID.
4. **Create in Zephyr** (after explicit user approval)
- `Create Test Case` (with `customFields` included — no separate Update needed) → `Create Test Case Steps` → `Create Test Case Issue Link`
- For **updates** to existing TCs: fetch current steps via `Get Test Case Steps`, show before/after diff, wait for explicit approval, then `Update Test Case`.
## Platform Rules
| AC row | Action |
| ------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Single row `[ WEB + MOBILE ]` | ONE TC, Platform = "Web and Mobile", no platform prefix in name |
| Two rows same behavior, different platforms | TWO TCs with `Web_` / `Mobile_` prefix — never merge |
## Naming & Filing
- **Name**: Prefix `Web_` / `Mobile_` only when platform-exclusive; omit prefix for Web and Mobile.
- **Folder**: Use exact Folder ID provided by user or specified in Technical Impact.
### Role Mapping Rule
- **CRITICAL**: If Acceptance Criteria uses generic terms like "user", "buyer", or "customer" in ordering/checkout context, it MUST mapped to ALL purchasing roles: `["Client user", "Client admin", "Internal sales rep", "External sales rep"]`. not default to `Client user`.
## API Critical Notes (SmartBear MCP — `@smartbear/smartbear-mcp`)
- **`Create Test Case`** requires `projectKey="{PROJECT}"` and supports `customFields` directly (no separate Update needed for Roles/Platform).
- **`Create Test Case Steps`** uses `testCaseKey` + `mode` (APPEND/OVERWRITE) + `items[]`.
- **`Create Test Case Issue Link`** uses `testCaseKey` + `issueId` (numeric Jira issue ID — get from ticket's `id` field, not key string).
- **`Get Issue Link Test Cases`** uses `issueKey` (e.g., `{PROJECT}-{ID}`) — returns linked TC keys directly.
- **`Update Test Case`** uses `testCaseKey` — only needed when modifying existing TCs, not for new creation.
## Anti-Patterns
- **No prefix omission**: TC name sent to Zephyr API must include `Web_` or `Mobile_` prefix for platform-exclusive TCs — copy verbatim from artifact draft; omit prefix only when Platform = "Web and Mobile".
- **No Draft skip**: Always set status = Draft; never auto-approve.
- **No flat folderId**: Use `"folder": {"id": X}` in all PUT payloads.
- **No WEB+MOBILE split**: One AC row = one TC with Platform "Web and Mobile".
- **No platform merge**: Two AC rows, different platforms = two separate TCs.
- **No silent update**: Show before/after diff; wait for explicit approval.
- **No lookup skip**: Always run Step direct link lookup before supplemental search.
- **No stale artifact**: Delete existing `zephyr_test_plan.md` before each run.
- **No coverage skip**: Coverage Analysis table must open every artifact.
- **No ghost update**: Update Zephyr TC whenever matching code changes.
- **No vague steps**: Use specific observable outcomes — e.g., `"System works"` → `"Banner 'Success' is visible"`.Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.