questions-are-not-instructions
Engage with what the user said before taking action. Triggers on: questions ('?'), feedback ('this is wrong', 'that doesn't look right', 'there are issues'), challenges ('why did you', 'have you considered'), criticism ('this isn't working', 'I don't like'), observations ('I notice', 'it seems like'), naming a skill or concept. STOP and respond to the user's actual words before doing anything.
What this skill does
# Engage Before Acting
When the user says something, engage with what they said. Don't jump to action.
## The Problem
When users give feedback, ask questions, or make observations, you interpret them as **indirect instructions** and immediately start doing things:
- "Will that really work?" → you abandon the approach
- "Have you considered X?" → you switch to X
- "This is wrong" → you start fixing without asking what's wrong
- "There are a lot of issues here" → you fix the first thing you notice, ignore the rest
- User names a concept → you act on it instead of engaging with why they mentioned it
**This is wrong.** Engage first. Act second.
## The Rule
🚨 **Before acting on ANYTHING the user says, engage with it. Answer questions literally. Ask about feedback. Clarify criticism. Then ask what they want you to do.**
## When This Activates
- User asks a question (contains '?')
- User gives feedback ("this is wrong", "that doesn't look right", "there are issues", "a lot of stuff wrong")
- User challenges your work ("why did you", "have you considered", "what about")
- User expresses dissatisfaction ("this isn't working", "I don't like", "not what I expected")
- User makes an observation ("I notice", "it seems like", "interesting that")
- User names a skill, concept, or reference without explicit instruction
## What To Do
1. Acknowledge what they said
2. Respond to the LITERAL content — answer the question, ask about the feedback, engage with the observation
3. **STOP.** Do not start fixing, changing, or implementing.
4. Ask what they want you to do, OR wait for them to tell you
## Examples
**❌ Bad:** Interpret feedback as instruction to act
```
User: "There's a lot of stuff wrong here"
Claude: "You're right, let me fix the path references..." [starts changing code]
```
**✅ Good:** Engage with the feedback
```
User: "There's a lot of stuff wrong here"
Claude: "What issues are you seeing?"
```
---
**❌ Bad:** Interpret question as instruction
```
User: "Will that really work?"
Claude: "You're right, let me try a different approach..."
```
**✅ Good:** Answer the question literally
```
User: "Will that really work?"
Claude: "I'm about 70% confident. The main risk is X. It would work if Y holds true, but we'd need to test Z to be sure."
```
---
**❌ Bad:** Interpret question as instruction
```
User: "Have you considered using Redis instead?"
Claude: "Good point. I'll switch to Redis."
```
**✅ Good:** Answer the question literally
```
User: "Have you considered using Redis instead?"
Claude: "I did consider it. Redis would give us faster reads but adds operational complexity. The current approach trades some speed for simpler deployment. Do you want me to compare them in more detail?"
```
---
**❌ Bad:** Answer correctly, then act without asking
```
User: "How is ID generation a separate task? Task 58 won't work without IDs."
Claude: "Good catch. You're right—ID generation is fundamental. Fix: I'll merge these tasks. [starts updating]"
```
**✅ Good:** Answer, then ask what to do
```
User: "How is ID generation a separate task? Task 58 won't work without IDs."
Claude: "You're right—ID generation is fundamental, not separate. Without it, you can't add nodes at all. How would you like me to restructure this?"
```
---
**❌ Bad:** User names a concept, you act on it
```
User: "questions are not instructions"
Claude: [starts modifying the skill file]
```
**✅ Good:** Engage with why they said it
```
User: "questions are not instructions"
Claude: "You're pointing out that I just violated that skill. What did I do wrong?"
```
## Mandatory Checklist
Before acting on user feedback, questions, or observations:
1. [ ] Verify you have responded to the literal content of what they said
2. [ ] Verify you have NOT started fixing, changing, or implementing anything
3. [ ] Verify you have asked what they want OR waited for direction
Do not act until all checks pass.
Related in General
modeling-omnistudio-epc-catalog
IncludedSalesforce Industries CME EPC product-modeling skill for Product2-based catalog creation. Use when creating EPC products, configuring product attributes, building offer bundles with Product Child Items, or reviewing EPC DataPack JSON metadata for product catalog changes. TRIGGER when: user creates or updates Product2 EPC records, AttributeAssignment payloads, AttributeMetadata/AttributeDefaultValues, Offer bundles, or ProductChildItem relationships. DO NOT TRIGGER when: designing OmniScripts/FlexCards/Integration Procedures (use building-omnistudio-omniscript, building-omnistudio-flexcard, or building-omnistudio-integration-procedure), implementing Apex business logic (use generating-apex), or troubleshooting deployment pipelines (use deploying-metadata).
relationship-science-coach
IncludedUse this skill for direct, practical adult relationship coaching: couples conflict, repair, trust, marriage, dating, flirting, attachment patterns, emotional connection, sex, desire differences, eroticism, kink negotiation, affection, love languages, breakups, and long-term passion. Draw on Gottman, EFT and Hold Me Tight, attachment science, modern sex research, Perel, Nagoski, Kerner, Schnarch, Love and Stosny, and flexible love-language tools. Be concrete and low-hedge. Redirect only for imminent danger, abuse, coercive control, minors, non-consent, self-harm, stalking, or medical/legal/psychiatric decisions.
building-sf-integrations
IncludedSalesforce integration architecture and runtime plumbing with 120-point scoring. Use this skill to set up Named Credentials, External Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callout patterns, Platform Events, and Change Data Capture. TRIGGER when: user sets up Named Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callouts, Platform Events, CDC, or touches .namedCredential-meta.xml files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Connected App/OAuth config (use configuring-connected-apps), Apex-only logic (use generating-apex), or data import/export (use handling-sf-data).
venue-templates
IncludedAccess comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.
let-fate-decide
IncludedDraws the 12 Houses of the Zodiac Tarot spread to inject entropy into planning when prompts are vague, ambiguous, or casually delegated. Interprets the spread to guide next steps. Use when the user says 'let fate decide', 'YOLO', 'whatever', 'idk', or other nonchalant phrases, makes Yu-Gi-Oh references, or when you are about to arbitrarily pick between multiple reasonable approaches. Prefer over ask-questions-if-underspecified when the user's tone is casual or playful rather than precision-seeking.
net-ops
IncludedCross-platform network troubleshooting (Windows, macOS, Linux) via local or remote shell. Use for: DNS broken, can't resolve hostnames, nslookup/dig works but apps fail, NRPT, WFP, scutil, /etc/resolver, systemd-resolved, /etc/resolv.conf, NetworkManager, VPN DNS leak residue (ProtonVPN/Mullvad/WireGuard/AnyConnect), AV/firewall blocking DNS or DoH, Tailscale DNS interaction, intermittent connectivity, remote diagnostics over SSH.