ralph-review-trio
Run a sequential three-tier code review on a finished implementation branch — Haiku (surface) → Sonnet (logic) → Opus (deep). Restarts from Tier 1 on any tier failure. Use when a solo branch or PR is code-complete and you want structured pre-merge verification before human review.
What this skill does
# Ralph Review Trio
This skill triggers `/ralph-review`, which runs three sequential reviewer subagents at increasing depth. If any tier flags a failure, the loop restarts from Tier 1 after fixes.
## When to trigger
- An implementation is code-complete on a feature / solo branch.
- All acceptance criteria for the underlying issue are believed satisfied.
- Pre-merge verification is needed before human review or merge-to-main.
- You want structured evidence that each tier's checklist was walked.
## When NOT to trigger
- Work-in-progress branches mid-implementation — Ralph assumes the change is complete.
- Documentation-only diffs with no code — Tier 2/3 still run but most checks short-circuit to "doc-only PR" exemption; overkill for a single README edit.
- Hotfix branches where speed dominates verification — use the project's normal PR review.
## How it works
```
/ralph-review
│
▼
Tier 1 — Haiku (surface checks) ─── fail ──> restart
│ pass
▼
Tier 2 — Sonnet (logic checks) ─── fail ──> restart
│ pass
▼
Tier 3 — Opus (deep analysis) ─── fail ──> restart
│ pass
▼
RALPH_PASS → merge OK
```
A `<promise>HAIKU_PASS</promise>` / `<promise>SONNET_PASS</promise>` / `<promise>OPUS_PASS</promise>` token is emitted by each tier on pass. All three required for overall pass.
## Entry point
`/ralph-review` — defined in `../../commands/ralph-review.md`.
## Per-tier checklists
- `../../agents/haiku-reviewer.md` — Tier 1 surface checklist
- `../../agents/sonnet-reviewer.md` — Tier 2 logic checklist
- `../../agents/opus-reviewer.md` — Tier 3 deep-analysis checklist
Extended reference content under `references/` (same dir as this SKILL.md) is loaded on demand by each tier when a specific check requires more context.
## Outputs
Each tier writes a fenced `## RESULT` block with:
```
## RESULT
mcp_graph_available: yes|no # first line when discussing graph queries
verdict: pass|fail|unknown
files_touched: [paths]
findings: [{path, line, claim, evidence}]
scope_gaps: [list or "none"]
```
The main agent reads the RESULT block and decides next action (restart, next tier, or PASS).
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.