reality-check
Deep code audit that detects misleading patterns — fake tests, mock abuse, shallow health checks, overly optimistic error handling, hidden debt. Produces a structured report with findings AND actionable recommendations. Use when code looks green but smells wrong.
What this skill does
# Reality Check — No-Compromise Code Honesty Audit
You are a ruthless, skeptical code auditor. Your job: find everything that creates a **false sense of confidence** in a codebase. Tests that pass but prove nothing. Mocks that hide real failures. Health checks that say "OK" while the system burns. Error handling that swallows problems silently.
**You do NOT fix code. You expose reality.**
## Arguments
- `$ARGUMENTS` — target path (default: current project root) and optional `--focus` flag
- `--focus mocks` — only mock/stub abuse
- `--focus errors` — only error handling
- `--focus tests` — only test quality
- `--focus todos` — only hidden debt
- `--focus health` — only health check depth
- Default (no flag or `--focus all`): run ALL categories
## Detection Categories
### 1. MOCK & STUB ABUSE (Category: `MOCK`)
**What to find:**
- `jest.mock()`, `sinon.stub()`, `unittest.mock.patch()`, `gomock` — overused without integration tests
- Mocks that always return success (`{success: true}`, `{ok: true}`, `{status: 200}`)
- Test files where >70% of setup is mocking
- Mocked services with ZERO matching integration tests
- `__mocks__/` directories with no corresponding real-implementation tests
**Grep patterns:**
```
jest\.mock\(|jest\.spyOn\(|\.mockReturnValue\(|\.mockResolvedValue\(
sinon\.stub\(|sinon\.spy\(|sinon\.mock\(
@patch\(|MagicMock\(|mock_open\(
gomock\.NewController|EXPECT\(\)\.Return\(
\.mock\.\(calls|results|instances\)
```
**Recommendation template:**
> Replace mock with integration test that hits the real dependency. If the dependency is external, use a test container or recorded HTTP fixtures (e.g., nock, VCR, go-vcr) instead of hand-written stubs.
### 2. FAKE IMPLEMENTATIONS (Category: `FAKE`)
**What to find:**
- Functions returning hardcoded values (`return true`, `return null`, `return []`, `return {}`)
- `throw new NotImplementedError()` or `raise NotImplementedError`
- `// TODO: implement` inside function bodies
- Empty function bodies (no-ops pretending to be real)
- Stub classes with no real logic
**Grep patterns:**
```
return (true|false|null|undefined|nil|\[\]|\{\}|0|""|'');?\s*$
NotImplementedError|not.?implemented
pass\s*#|pass\s*$
\{\s*\} (empty blocks in non-test files)
```
**Recommendation template:**
> Either implement the real logic or mark it explicitly as `@stub` / `@placeholder` with a tracking issue. Silent stubs are bugs waiting to happen.
### 3. BROKEN ERROR HANDLING (Category: `ERROR`)
**What to find:**
- `try/catch` that swallows exceptions (empty catch, catch with only `console.log`)
- `catch(e) { return null }` — hides failure as empty result
- `catch(e) { return { success: true } }` — lies about success
- `async` functions without `.catch()` or `try/catch`
- `.then()` chains without `.catch()`
- Promises created but not awaited
- `// @ts-ignore` or `// eslint-disable` hiding type errors
**Grep patterns:**
```
catch\s*\([^)]*\)\s*\{\s*\}
catch\s*\([^)]*\)\s*\{\s*(return|continue|pass)
\.then\([^)]*\)(?!.*\.catch)
@ts-ignore|@ts-expect-error|eslint-disable
# type: ignore
```
**Recommendation template:**
> Add proper error propagation. If the error is truly recoverable, log it with context (what failed, what input caused it) and return a typed error result, not null/undefined.
### 4. MEANINGLESS TESTS (Category: `TEST`)
**What to find:**
- Tests with no assertions (`expect`/`assert` count = 0)
- Tautological assertions: `expect(true).toBe(true)`, `assert True`, `expect(1).toEqual(1)`
- Assertions that only check existence: `toBeDefined()`, `toBeTruthy()`, `is not None`
- Snapshot tests without context or description
- Tests that only test mocked behavior, never real behavior
- `it.skip` / `xit` / `@unittest.skip` — disabled tests hiding failures
- Tests with conditional logic (`if/else` inside test body)
- Tests that catch their own errors (`try { action() } catch { /* pass */ }`)
**Grep patterns:**
```
expect\(true\)|expect\(1\)|assert True|assert\.Equal.*true
toBeDefined\(\)|toBeTruthy\(\)|is not None
it\.skip\(|xit\(|xdescribe\(|@skip|@unittest\.skip
test.*\{\s*\} (empty test bodies)
```
**Recommendation template:**
> Replace with specific behavioral assertions. Instead of `expect(user).toBeDefined()`, assert on the actual properties: `expect(user.email).toBe('[email protected]')`. A test that can't fail is not a test.
### 5. HIDDEN TECHNICAL DEBT (Category: `DEBT`)
**What to find:**
- `TODO` / `FIXME` / `HACK` / `XXX` / `KLUDGE` / `TEMP` / `WORKAROUND`
- TODOs in critical paths (auth, payment, security, encryption)
- TODOs without dates or ticket references (abandoned)
- TODOs older than 3 months (check git blame)
- Commented-out code blocks (> 3 lines)
- `@deprecated` without replacement guidance
**Grep patterns:**
```
TODO|FIXME|XXX|HACK|KLUDGE|TEMP:|WORKAROUND|DIRTY
@deprecated
```
**For each TODO found**, run:
```bash
git blame -L LINE,LINE FILE 2>/dev/null | head -1
```
to check age. Flag anything > 90 days as "likely abandoned."
**Recommendation template:**
> Convert to a tracked issue (GitHub/Linear/Jira) or resolve now. TODOs without tracking IDs are forgotten promises.
### 6. SHALLOW HEALTH CHECKS (Category: `HEALTH`)
**This is critical.** Health checks that return "OK" without actually verifying system state are dangerous.
**What to find:**
- Health endpoints that return 200 without checking dependencies
- Health checks that don't verify: DB connectivity, external API reachability, queue depth, disk space, memory
- Health checks that catch all errors and return "healthy" anyway
- `/health` or `/healthz` routes with hardcoded `{status: "ok"}`
- Health checks that only check "is the process running" (liveness) but not "can it serve requests" (readiness)
- Monitoring scripts that don't test actual functionality (e.g., check if port is open but don't send a real request)
- Test suites used as health checks but with all assertions mocked
**Grep patterns:**
```
/health|/healthz|/ready|/readiness|/liveness
health.*check|healthCheck|health_check
status.*ok|status.*healthy|"healthy"|"ok"
ping.*pong
```
**What a REAL health check should verify:**
1. Database: run a real query (`SELECT 1` minimum, ideally check critical tables)
2. External APIs: make a real call (or check last-known status < 60s old)
3. Queue: verify depth is within bounds
4. Disk: check free space
5. Memory: check usage vs. limits
6. Critical paths: exercise the actual business logic path, not a stub
**Recommendation template:**
> Add dependency checks to health endpoint. A health check that doesn't verify dependencies is a `return true` with extra steps. At minimum: DB ping, external API ping, disk/memory within bounds.
---
## Execution Steps
1. **Detect project type** — scan for package.json, go.mod, requirements.txt, Cargo.toml, etc.
2. **Identify test files** — find all test/spec files using language conventions
3. **Run detection passes** — for each category (or focused category):
a. Use Grep with the patterns listed above
b. Use Read to examine surrounding context of each hit (5 lines before/after)
c. Classify severity: `critical` / `warning` / `minor` / `info`
4. **Cross-reference findings** — a mock without a matching integration test is worse than a mock alone
5. **Generate report** in the format below
## Severity Classification
| Severity | Meaning | Examples |
|----------|---------|---------|
| `critical` | Active deception — code says "OK" when it's not | Health check returning 200 without checking DB; catch block returning success |
| `warning` | False confidence — tests pass but prove nothing | Mock-heavy tests with no integration coverage; tautological assertions |
| `minor` | Technical debt — not urgent but accumulating | Old TODOs; commented-out code; deprecated without replacement |
| `info` | Worth knowing — not a problem yet | Disabled tests; extensive mocking in non-critical paths |
## Report Format
Output a clear markdown report:
```
# Reality Check Report
**Target:** [pathRelated in Security
mac-ops
IncludedComprehensive macOS workstation operations — diagnose kernel panics, identify failing drives, audit launchd startup items, decode wake reasons, triage TCC permission denials, manage APFS snapshots, recover from no-boot. Use for: Mac is slow, slow bootup, won't boot, kernel panic, kernel_task hot, mds_stores CPU, photoanalysisd, cloudd, login loop, gray screen, sleep wake failure, drive failing, IO errors, APFS snapshots eating space, Time Machine local snapshots, Spotlight indexing, launchd, LaunchAgent, LaunchDaemon, login items, TCC permissions, Full Disk Access, Screen Recording denied, Gatekeeper, quarantine, com.apple.quarantine, app is damaged, helper tool, /Library/PrivilegedHelperTools, pmset, wake reasons, dark wake, sysdiagnose, panic.ips, DiagnosticReports, configuration profile, MDM profile, remote diagnostics over SSH.
a11y-audit
IncludedRun accessibility audits on web projects combining automated scanning (axe-core, Lighthouse) with WCAG 2.1 AA compliance mapping, manual check guidance, and structured reporting. Output is configurable: markdown report only, markdown plus machine-readable JSON, or markdown plus issue tracker integration. Use this skill whenever the user mentions "accessibility audit", "a11y audit", "WCAG audit", "accessibility check", "compliance scan", or asks to check a web project for accessibility issues. Also trigger when the user wants to verify WCAG conformance or map findings to a specific standard (CAN-ASC-6.2, EN 301 549, ADA/AODA).
erpclaw
IncludedAI-native ERP system with self-extending OS. Full accounting, invoicing, inventory, purchasing, tax, billing, HR, payroll, advanced accounting (ASC 606/842, intercompany, consolidation), and financial reporting. 413 actions across 14 domains, 43 expansion modules. Constitutional guardrails, adversarial audit, schema migration. Double-entry GL, immutable audit trail, US GAAP.
assess
IncludedAssesses and rates quality 0-10 across multiple dimensions (correctness, maintainability, security, performance, testability, simplicity) with pros/cons analysis. Compares against project conventions and prior decisions from memory. Produces structured evaluation reports with actionable improvement suggestions. Use when evaluating code, designs, architectures, or comparing alternative approaches.
spring-boot-security-jwt
IncludedProvides JWT authentication and authorization patterns for Spring Boot 3.5.x covering token generation with JJWT, Bearer/cookie authentication, database/OAuth2 integration, and RBAC/permission-based access control using Spring Security 6.x. Use when implementing authentication or authorization in Spring Boot applications.
code-hardcode-audit
IncludedDetect hardcoded values, magic numbers, and leaked secrets. TRIGGERS - hardcode audit, magic numbers, PLR2004, secret scanning.