recipe-front-plan
Create frontend work plan from design document and obtain plan approval
What this skill does
**Context**: Dedicated to the frontend planning phase.
## Orchestrator Definition
**Core Identity**: "I am an orchestrator." (see subagents-orchestration-guide skill)
**Execution Protocol**:
1. **Delegate all work** to sub-agents — your role is to invoke sub-agents, pass data between them, and report results
2. **Follow subagents-orchestration-guide skill planning flow**:
- Execute steps defined below
- **Stop and obtain approval** for plan content before completion
3. **Scope**: See Scope Boundaries below
**CRITICAL**: When the user requests test generation, always execute acceptance-test-generator first — it provides the test skeleton that work-planner depends on.
## Scope Boundaries
**Included in this skill**:
- Design document selection
- Test skeleton generation with acceptance-test-generator
- Work plan creation with work-planner
- Work plan review with document-reviewer
- Plan approval obtainment
**Responsibility Boundary**: This skill completes with work plan approval.
Follow the planning process below:
## Execution Process
### Step 1: Design Document Selection
! ls -la docs/design/*.md | head -10
- Check for existence of design documents, notify user if none exist
- Present options if multiple exist (can be specified with $ARGUMENTS)
### Step 2: Test Skeleton Generation Confirmation
- Confirm with user whether to generate test skeletons (integration + fixture-e2e + service-integration-e2e) first
- If user wants generation: acceptance-test-generator generates skeletons across all applicable lanes
- Invoke acceptance-test-generator using Agent tool:
- `subagent_type`: "dev-workflows-frontend:acceptance-test-generator"
- `description`: "Test skeleton generation"
- If UI Spec exists: `prompt: "Generate test skeletons from Design Doc at [path]. UI Spec at [ui-spec path]."`
- If no UI Spec: `prompt: "Generate test skeletons from Design Doc at [path]."`
- Pass integration test file path, fixture-e2e and service-integration-e2e file paths (or null per lane), and e2eAbsenceReason (per lane) to work-planner according to subagents-orchestration-guide "acceptance-test-generator → work-planner" section
### Step 3: Work Plan Creation
Invoke work-planner using Agent tool:
- `subagent_type`: "dev-workflows-frontend:work-planner"
- `description`: "Work plan creation"
- If test skeletons were generated in Step 2, build the prompt by listing every lane's status:
- Always include: "Integration test file: [path or 'not generated']"
- For each E2E lane (`fixtureE2e`, `serviceE2e`):
- When `generatedFiles.<lane>` is not null: "[lane] test file: [path]"
- When `generatedFiles.<lane>` is null: "No [lane] skeleton generated (reason: [e2eAbsenceReason.<lane>])"
- Append placement guidance: "Integration tests are created simultaneously with each phase implementation. fixture-e2e tests are created alongside the UI feature phase. service-integration-e2e tests are executed only in the final phase."
- If test skeletons were not generated:
`prompt`: "Create work plan from Design Doc at [path]."
- Follow subagents-orchestration-guide Prompt Construction Rule for additional prompt parameters
### Step 4: Work Plan Review
Invoke document-reviewer to review the work plan:
- `subagent_type`: "dev-workflows-frontend:document-reviewer"
- `description`: "Work plan review"
- `prompt`: "doc_type: WorkPlan target: docs/plans/[plan-name].md. Review semantic traceability to the Design Doc, early verification placement, real-boundary verification coverage, Failure Mode Checklist, and Review Scope."
- The work plan is a derivation of the Design Doc, so plan-fidelity findings are resolved without user input. Branch on the reviewer's `verdict.decision`: on `needs_revision`, re-invoke work-planner in update mode with the findings and re-review, repeating until `approved` or `approved_with_conditions`. On `rejected`, escalate to the user.
### Step 5: Present for Approval
- Present the reviewed work plan to the user for batch approval. If the user requests changes, re-invoke work-planner with revised parameters and re-run Step 4.
- Highlight steps with unclear scope or external dependencies and ask the user to confirm
## Response at Completion
**Recommended**: End with the following standard response after plan content approval
```
Frontend planning phase completed.
- Work plan: docs/plans/[plan-name].md
- Status: Approved
Please provide separate instructions for implementation.
```
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.