Claude
Skills
Sign in
Back

reconciliation

Included with Lifetime
$97 forever

Design and operate reconciliation processes that ensure data accuracy across portfolio management custodian and clearing systems. Use when building or evaluating a daily position cash or transaction reconciliation process, investigating discrepancies between internal systems and custodian records, diagnosing recurring break patterns especially from corporate actions or pricing differences, setting tolerance thresholds for position cash or market value matching, implementing three-way reconciliation across advisor system custodian and clearing firm, designing break investigation workflows with aging and escalation, normalizing data across multi-custodian feeds from Schwab Fidelity or Pershing, reconciling cost basis tax lots or accrued income across systems, evaluating reconciliation platforms like Arcesium Duco or Advent Geneva, or preparing for regulatory examinations on books and records accuracy.

Design

What this skill does


# Reconciliation

## Purpose
Guide the design and operation of reconciliation processes in securities operations. Covers position reconciliation, cash reconciliation, transaction reconciliation, three-way reconciliation (advisor/custodian/portfolio accounting), break identification and resolution, reconciliation automation, and regulatory requirements. Enables building or operating reconciliation programs that ensure data accuracy across systems and satisfy fiduciary and regulatory obligations.

## Layer
12 — Client Operations (Account Lifecycle & Servicing)

## Direction
retrospective

## When to Use
- Designing or evaluating a daily reconciliation process for an advisory firm or broker-dealer
- Investigating position, cash, or transaction discrepancies between internal systems and custodian records
- Building or improving reconciliation automation with exception-based processing
- Diagnosing recurring break patterns (especially corporate action-related breaks)
- Establishing tolerance thresholds for position, cash, and market value matching
- Setting up three-way reconciliation across advisor system, custodian, and clearing firm
- Designing break investigation and resolution workflows with aging and escalation
- Implementing multi-custodian reconciliation with data normalization across feeds
- Evaluating reconciliation software platforms or matching engines
- Preparing for regulatory examinations involving books and records accuracy
- Addressing fiduciary obligations related to data accuracy in client reporting and billing
- Reconciling cost basis, accrued income, or market values across systems
- Integrating corporate action processing into the reconciliation workflow

## Core Concepts

### 1. Reconciliation Types and Hierarchy

Reconciliation is the systematic comparison of records across two or more systems to identify and resolve discrepancies. In securities operations, reconciliation ensures that the firm's internal records (the investment book of record, or IBOR) match the custodian's official records (the official book of record, or OBOR) and, where applicable, the clearing firm's records. The reconciliation hierarchy proceeds from the most fundamental data element (positions) through increasingly derived data elements.

**Position Reconciliation.** The foundational reconciliation. Compares the number of shares or units held for each security in each account between the firm's portfolio management system (PMS) and the custodian. Position reconciliation is typically zero-tolerance: any share count difference, no matter how small, constitutes a break. Fractional share differences (common with dividend reinvestment plans) must also be identified and resolved. Position reconciliation is performed daily, using end-of-day files from the custodian compared against the PMS position ledger.

**Cash Reconciliation.** Compares cash balances between the PMS and the custodian, accounting for settled cash, pending settlements, accrued income, and pending fee debits. Cash reconciliation is more nuanced than position reconciliation because timing differences are inherent — a trade executed on day T settles on T+1, and the PMS and custodian may record the cash impact on different dates. Cash tolerance thresholds are common, typically a small dollar amount (e.g., $0.50 to $5.00) to accommodate rounding differences across systems. Balances outside the tolerance require investigation.

**Transaction Reconciliation.** Compares individual transactions (trades, dividends, interest payments, transfers, fees) recorded in the PMS against the custodian's transaction ledger. Transaction reconciliation operates at the trade level, matching on security, quantity, price, trade date, and settlement date. Unmatched transactions on either side constitute breaks. Transaction reconciliation is typically performed on a T+1 basis — comparing yesterday's activity after the custodian's end-of-day file is received.

**Market Value Reconciliation.** Compares the total market value of each position and each account between systems. Market value breaks often result from pricing differences — the PMS and custodian may source prices from different vendors or apply different pricing hierarchies for thinly traded or illiquid securities. Market value tolerance is typically expressed in basis points (e.g., 5-10 bps of account value) rather than absolute dollars, because a $100 difference on a $50,000 account is more significant than a $100 difference on a $5,000,000 account.

**Accrued Income Reconciliation.** Compares accrued interest on fixed-income holdings and declared-but-unpaid dividends. Accrued income differences frequently arise from day-count convention differences (actual/actual vs. 30/360), ex-date vs. record-date timing, or different treatment of defaulted bonds. This reconciliation is particularly important for fixed-income-heavy portfolios where accrued income is a material component of total value.

**Cost Basis Reconciliation.** Compares the tax lot-level cost basis for each position between the PMS and the custodian. Cost basis discrepancies are among the most difficult to resolve because they may originate from historical corporate actions (splits, mergers, spin-offs, return of capital adjustments) that were processed differently in each system. Since the custodian reports cost basis to the IRS on Form 1099-B, cost basis discrepancies can result in incorrect tax reporting if not resolved. Cost basis reconciliation is typically performed less frequently than position reconciliation — monthly or quarterly — but with zero tolerance for discrepancies.

### 2. Three-Way Reconciliation

For advisory firms that use a portfolio management system separate from both the custodian and any clearing firm, three-way reconciliation is the standard of practice. The three records being compared are:

**Advisor System (PMS / Portfolio Accounting).** The firm's investment book of record (IBOR), maintained in the portfolio management system (Orion, Black Diamond, Tamarac, Addepar, or similar). This is the record the firm uses for performance reporting, billing, rebalancing, and client-facing communications. The advisor system reflects the firm's understanding of what each client owns.

**Custodian Records.** The official book of record (OBOR), maintained by the custodian (Schwab, Fidelity, Pershing, or similar). This is the legally authoritative record of client assets. The custodian is responsible for safekeeping assets, settling transactions, and reporting to the IRS. When the advisor system and custodian disagree, the custodian record is presumed correct unless the firm can demonstrate otherwise.

**Clearing Firm Records.** For firms that clear through a separate entity (introducing broker-dealers that clear through a correspondent clearing firm), the clearing firm maintains its own record of positions and transactions. The clearing firm processes settlements, maintains margin calculations, and generates customer statements. In a fully disclosed arrangement, the clearing firm's records should match the custodian's, but discrepancies can arise from timing, corporate action processing, or data feed errors.

**Authoritative Source by Data Element.** Different systems serve as the authoritative source for different data elements:

| Data Element | Authoritative Source | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Share/unit count | Custodian | Custodian holds the securities in legal custody |
| Settled cash balance | Custodian | Custodian controls the cash account |
| Trade execution details | Executing broker / custodian | Trade occurred on their platform |
| Cost basis (for tax reporting) | Custodian | Custodian reports 1099-B to IRS |
| Performance returns | Advisor system (PMS) | PMS maintains the calculation methodology |
| Model assignment and drift | Advisor system (PMS) | PMS manages the investment process |
| Fee schedule and billing | Advisor system (PMS) | PMS calculates fees per advisory agreemen

Related in Design