respond-pr-feedback
Respond to review comments on a PR after evaluation and fixes
What this skill does
# Respond to PR Feedback
Post replies to review comments after you've evaluated the feedback and made fixes. Resolves conversation threads by default.
## Usage
Invoke the **respond-pr-feedback** skill, optionally passing these flags:
```
respond-pr-feedback [--pr <number>] [--no-resolve]
```
**Flags:**
- `--pr <number>` - PR number to target (default: current branch's PR)
- `--no-resolve` - Skip thread resolution after posting replies (default: resolve all)
## Prerequisites
Run the [fetch-pr-feedback](../fetch-pr-feedback/SKILL.md) skill first to evaluate the feedback and make any necessary fixes.
## Hard gates (sequenced)
Advance only after each pass condition is met (objective checks—not assumed completion).
1. **Prerequisite satisfied:** You have already run the [fetch-pr-feedback](../fetch-pr-feedback/SKILL.md) skill, evaluated each thread, and applied fixes or chosen an explicit response strategy per thread (no posting blind).
2. **Context loaded:** Step 2 commands exit `0`; values parsed from `gh pr view`, `gh repo view`, and `gh api user` are non-empty and assigned to `$PR_NUMBER`, `$PR_AUTHOR`, `$OWNER`, `$REPO`, `$CURRENT_USER`—never invent owner, repo, or PR number.
3. **Queue decided:** Step 3a `jq` exits `0`. If the filtered list is empty, output exactly `All review comments have been addressed.` and **stop** (do not call reply or GraphQL resolve APIs).
4. **Reply before resolve:** For each target comment, Step 4 `gh api .../replies` exits `0` before Step 5 attempts resolution for that item (unless `--no-resolve`).
5. **Resolve with mapping:** Step 5 calls `resolveReviewThread` only when Step 3b provides a `threadId` for that comment’s id; if there is no mapping, skip resolution for that item without treating it as failure.
## Instructions
### 1. Parse Arguments
Extract flags from `$ARGUMENTS`:
- `--pr <number>` or detect from current branch
- `--no-resolve` flag (boolean, default false)
### 2. Get PR Context
```bash
# Get PR info (if --pr not specified, uses current branch)
gh pr view --json number,author --jq '{number, author: .author.login}'
# Get repo owner/name
gh repo view --json owner,name --jq '{owner: .owner.login, name: .name}'
# Get current authenticated user
gh api user --jq '.login'
```
Store as `$PR_NUMBER`, `$PR_AUTHOR`, `$OWNER`, `$REPO`, `$CURRENT_USER`.
**Note:** `$OWNER`, `$REPO`, etc. are placeholders. Substitute actual values from previous steps.
### 3. Fetch Unreplied Comments and Thread Data
#### 3a. Unreplied Review Comments
Fetch review comments, excluding PR author and current user, filtering to root comments that haven't been replied to.
Write the jq filter to a temp file using a heredoc with single-quoted delimiter (prevents shell escaping issues with `!=`, regex patterns, and angle brackets):
```bash
cat > /tmp/unreplied_comments.jq << 'JQEOF'
add // [] |
# Root comments from reviewers (not replies, not PR author, not current user)
[.[] | select(
.in_reply_to_id == null and
.user.login != $pr_author and
.user.login != $current_user
)] as $roots |
# IDs that current user has already replied to
[.[] | select(.user.login == $current_user) | .in_reply_to_id] as $replied |
# Filter to unreplied only
$roots | map(select(. as $c | $replied | index($c.id) == null)) |
# Dedup: group by path + line + reviewer, pick newest per group
group_by({
p: .path,
l: (.line // .original_line),
u: .user.login
}) |
map(sort_by(.created_at) | last) |
# Output needed fields
map({
id,
user: .user.login,
path,
line_display: (
.line as $end | .start_line as $start |
if $start and $start != $end then "\($start)-\($end)"
else "\($end // .original_line)" end
),
body
})
JQEOF
```
```bash
gh api --paginate "repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/comments" | \
jq -s --arg pr_author "$PR_AUTHOR" --arg current_user "$CURRENT_USER" \
-f /tmp/unreplied_comments.jq
```
If no unreplied comments found, output: "All review comments have been addressed." and stop.
#### 3b. Pre-fetch Thread Data
Fetch review thread IDs to enable resolution after posting replies:
```bash
gh api graphql -f query="
query {
repository(owner: \"$OWNER\", name: \"$REPO\") {
pullRequest(number: $PR_NUMBER) {
reviewThreads(first: 100) {
nodes {
id
isResolved
comments(first: 1) {
nodes { databaseId }
}
}
}
}
}
}
"
```
Build a lookup map: comment `databaseId` → thread `id` (unresolved threads only). This enables immediate resolution after posting each reply.
### 4. Generate and Post Replies
For each unreplied comment, determine the appropriate response based on your evaluation:
| Evaluation Outcome | Response |
|--------------------|----------|
| Feedback was incorrect/unfounded | Explain why the current code is correct |
| Feedback lacked context | Explain the design decision |
| Feedback was valid and fixed | "Fixed in `$COMMIT_SHA`" or brief description of change |
| Feedback was valid but won't fix | Explain the tradeoff/decision |
**Tagging guideline:** `@`-tag bot reviewers (e.g., `@coderabbitai`) to trigger their processing. Do not `@`-tag human reviewers.
Post reply to each comment:
```bash
gh api "repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/comments/$COMMENT_ID/replies" \
-X POST --raw-field body="$RESPONSE"
```
### 5. Resolve Threads
**This step runs by default.** Skip only if `--no-resolve` was passed.
After posting each reply, look up the `$THREAD_ID` from the step 3b mapping using the comment's `$COMMENT_ID`:
```bash
gh api graphql -f query="
mutation {
resolveReviewThread(input: {threadId: \"$THREAD_ID\"}) {
thread { isResolved }
}
}
"
```
- If a comment's `$COMMENT_ID` has a matching thread ID in the lookup, resolve it
- If no thread ID found (e.g., issue comment rather than review thread), skip resolution for that comment
### 6. Output Summary
Group by reviewer:
```markdown
### Reviewer: coderabbitai[bot]
| File:Line | Response Type | Thread |
|-----------|---------------|--------|
| `src/foo.ts:42` | Fixed in `abc1234` | Resolved |
| `src/bar.ts:15` | Explained design | Resolved |
### Reviewer: octocat
| File:Line | Response Type | Thread |
|-----------|---------------|--------|
| `src/baz.ts:7` | Won't fix | Resolved |
```
Footer:
```markdown
**Threads resolved: 3/3**
```
## Response Guidelines
- `@`-tag bot reviewers to trigger re-processing; do not tag human reviewers
- Keep responses concise and technical
- No performative agreement ("Great point!", "You're right!")
- Reference specific code/design when explaining decisions
- If fixed: state what changed, no gratitude
## Example
```
# Respond to all reviewers on current PR (resolves threads)
respond-pr-feedback
# Respond on a specific PR
respond-pr-feedback --pr 123
# Respond without resolving threads
respond-pr-feedback --no-resolve
```
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.