retrospecting
Mines recent agent conversations and git history for struggles, repeated corrections, rework patterns, and taste signals — then turns findings into new skills or updates to existing ones. Use when you want to retrospect on recent coding sessions to extract learnings, identify skill gaps, improve existing skills based on real usage patterns, or codify preferences that keep coming up in conversations.
What this skill does
# Retro Retrospective analysis of recent agent sessions and code changes to continuously improve the skill library. ## Current context - Branch: !`git branch --show-current` - Project: !`basename $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)` ## Decision tree - What do you want to do? - **Full retro** (conversations + git) -> follow "Running a full retro" below - **Just mine conversations** -> run `tools/conversation-miner.ts --project $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)` and review findings - **Just check git rework** -> run `tools/rework-detector.ts` and review findings - **Create skills from findings** -> follow "Acting on findings" below ## Running a full retro A full retro has two phases: gathering data and cross-referencing existing skills. For larger skill libraries or longer time ranges, offer to use agents — a Miner to gather and cluster, and a Cross-Referrer to classify findings against existing skills. For smaller retros, single-agent is fine. Let the user decide. ### Single-agent flow #### 1. Gather data Run both tools in parallel to collect findings: ```bash tools/conversation-miner.ts --project $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) --days 7 --json tools/rework-detector.ts --days 7 --json ``` Adjust `--days` based on how far back the user wants to look (default: 7 days). #### 2. Review and cluster Read the JSON output from both tools. Look for clusters — multiple findings that point to the same underlying issue or preference. Group them by theme: - **Repeated struggles** — the same kind of correction or retry across multiple conversations - **Taste patterns** — consistent preferences that aren't yet codified in a skill - **Rework hotspots** — files or areas where git shows repeated churn alongside conversation struggles - **Skill gaps** — tasks that required many turns but could be streamlined with a skill #### 3. Cross-reference existing skills Before proposing new skills, check what already exists: Use Glob to list existing skills: ``` Glob pattern: plugins/*/skills/*/SKILL.md ``` For each cluster, search existing skills for overlap: ``` Grep pattern: "<keyword>" in plugins/*/skills/*/SKILL.md ``` Classify each cluster as: - **New skill needed** — no existing skill covers this area - **Existing skill update** — a skill exists but misses this pattern - **AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md addition** — too small for a skill, better as a project instruction - **Memory entry** — a personal preference that should be saved to memory ### Agent flow (optional) When the skill library is large or the retro covers many days, agents keep context focused: **Miner** (general-purpose agent) — runs both tools, clusters raw findings by theme, produces a structured findings document with clusters, evidence, and frequency counts. **Cross-Referrer** (Explore agent, read-only) — receives the Miner's clusters, reads all existing skills in the repo (Glob for `plugins/*/skills/*/SKILL.md`), searches for overlap, and classifies each cluster as new skill / skill update / project-instructions addition / memory entry. Returns an annotated report. Flow: spawn Miner → read its clusters → spawn Cross-Referrer with clusters → read its classifications → format the report below. ### 4. Present the retro report Present findings to the user as a structured report: ```markdown ## Retro Report — [date range] ### Struggles Found For each struggle: - **Pattern**: what kept going wrong - **Evidence**: quotes from conversations, git commits - **Frequency**: how many times it appeared - **Suggested action**: new skill / skill update / project instructions / memory ### Taste Signals Found For each taste: - **Preference**: what the user consistently wants - **Evidence**: quotes showing the pattern - **Suggested action**: where to codify this ### Rework Hotspots For each hotspot: - **Files**: which files had high churn - **Pattern**: what kind of rework (fix-after-feat, reverts, etc.) - **Suggested action**: skill that could prevent this ``` Wait for user input before acting on any findings. ## Acting on findings For each approved finding: - **New skill** -> use the authoring skill to create it. Pass the finding's evidence as context for intent capture — the struggle patterns become the skill's decision tree branches, the taste signals become its conventions. - **Skill update** -> read the existing SKILL.md, identify where the new pattern fits, and edit it in. Add new decision tree branches, conventions, or tool behaviors as needed. - **AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md addition** -> append the preference or rule to the project's agent instruction file. - **Memory entry** -> save to memory using the appropriate memory type (feedback for corrections, user for preferences). ## Key references |File|What it covers| |---|---| |`references/pattern-catalog.md`|Catalog of recognizable struggle and taste patterns with detection heuristics|
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.