reviews-retros-reflection
Facilitates structured team reflection through retrospectives, post-mortems, after-action reviews, and weekly/quarterly reviews, producing root cause analysis and SMART action items with psychological safety. Use when conducting sprint retrospectives, project post-mortems, weekly reviews, quarterly reflections, after-action reviews (AARs), or when user mentions "retro", "retrospective", "what went well", "lessons learned", "reflection", or "how can we improve".
What this skill does
# Reviews, Retros & Reflection ## Table of Contents 1. [Workflow](#workflow) 2. [Retrospective Formats](#retrospective-formats) 3. [Common Patterns](#common-patterns) 4. [Guardrails](#guardrails) 5. [Quick Reference](#quick-reference) ## Workflow Copy this checklist and track your progress: ``` Retrospective Progress: - [ ] Step 1: Set the stage (context, psychological safety) - [ ] Step 2: Gather data (what happened) - [ ] Step 3: Generate insights (why it happened) - [ ] Step 4: Decide actions (what to change) - [ ] Step 5: Close and follow up (commit, track) ``` **Step 1: Set the stage** Define period/scope, review previous action items, establish psychological safety (Prime Directive: "everyone did best job given knowledge/skills/resources/context"). For quick reviews → Use [resources/template.md](resources/template.md). For complex team retros → Study [resources/methodology.md](resources/methodology.md). **Step 2: Gather data** Collect facts about period: metrics (velocity, bugs, incidents), events (launches, blockers, decisions), sentiment (team energy, morale). See [Retrospective Formats](#retrospective-formats) for collection methods. **Step 3: Generate insights** Identify patterns, root causes, surprises. Ask "why?" to move from symptoms to causes. Use [resources/methodology.md](resources/methodology.md) for root cause techniques (5 Whys, fishbone diagrams, timeline analysis). **Step 4: Decide actions** Vote on most impactful improvements (dot voting, SMART criteria). Define 1-3 SMART actions (Specific, Measurable, Assigned owner, Realistic, Time-bound). See [Common Patterns](#common-patterns) for action quality criteria. **Step 5: Close and follow up** Commit to actions, schedule check-in, thank participants. Track action completion rate (target: >80% completion before next retro). Self-check using `resources/evaluators/rubric_reviews_retros_reflection.json` before closing. Minimum standard: Average score ≥ 3.5. ## Retrospective Formats **Start/Stop/Continue (Simple, Balanced):** - **Start**: What should we begin doing? - **Stop**: What should we stop doing? - **Continue**: What's working well, keep doing? - **When**: General purpose, new teams, tight on time (30 min) **Mad/Sad/Glad (Emotion-Focused):** - **Mad**: What frustrated or angered you? - **Sad**: What disappointed you? - **Glad**: What made you happy? - **When**: Processing difficult period, improving morale, surfacing hidden issues **4Ls (Comprehensive):** - **Loved**: What did we love? - **Learned**: What did we learn? - **Lacked**: What did we lack? - **Longed for**: What did we long for? - **When**: End of major project, quarterly reviews, want depth **Sailboat/Speedboat (Metaphor-Based):** - **Wind** (helping): What's propelling us forward? - **Anchor** (hindering): What's slowing us down? - **Rocks** (risks): What dangers lie ahead? - **Island** (goal): Where are we going? - **When**: Strategic planning, visualizing progress, cross-functional teams **Timeline (Chronological):** - Plot events on timeline, mark highs/lows, identify patterns - **When**: Long period (quarter), complex project, need shared understanding ## Common Patterns **Pattern 1: Sprint Retrospective (Agile)** - **Frequency**: Every 1-2 weeks - **Duration**: 45-90 min (shorter sprints = shorter retros) - **Focus**: Process improvements, team dynamics, technical practices - **Format**: Start/Stop/Continue or Mad/Sad/Glad - **Actions**: 1-3 process improvements, 1 technical improvement **Pattern 2: Project Post-Mortem** - **Frequency**: End of project/phase - **Duration**: 90-120 min - **Focus**: What to repeat, what to avoid, systemic issues - **Format**: 4Ls or Timeline - **Actions**: Documentation updates, playbook changes, skill gaps to address **Pattern 3: Weekly Team Review** - **Frequency**: Weekly (Fridays common) - **Duration**: 15-30 min - **Focus**: Wins, blockers, priorities for next week - **Format**: Custom (Wins/Blockers/Priorities) - **Actions**: Blocker removal, celebrate wins, align on top 3 priorities **Pattern 4: Incident Retrospective** - **Frequency**: After major incidents - **Duration**: 60 min - **Focus**: Blameless analysis, system improvements - **Format**: Timeline + 5 Whys - **Actions**: Incident response improvements, monitoring/alerting, prevention ## Guardrails **Psychological safety:** - **Prime Directive**: "Regardless of what we discover, we understand and truly believe that everyone did the best job they could, given what they knew at the time, their skills and abilities, the resources available, and the situation at hand." - Focus on processes/systems, not people - No blame, no judgment, no defensiveness - Encourage dissenting opinions - What's said in retro stays in retro (unless actionable for others) **Quality standards:** - **Action items are SMART**: Specific, Measurable, Assigned, Realistic, Time-bound - **Track completion**: >80% action completion before next retro (if <80%, too many actions or not committed) - **Rotate facilitator**: Different person each time, prevents bias - **Time-box discussions**: Don't get stuck, move on, revisit if time - **Vote for focus**: Use dot voting to prioritize discussion topics **Common pitfalls to avoid:** - **Too many actions**: >5 actions = none get done. Focus on 1-3 high-impact items. - **Vague actions**: "Improve communication" → ❌. "Daily 15-min standup in #eng-sync by Monday" → ✓ - **No follow-up**: Actions from last retro ignored → trust erodes, retros become theater - **Blame culture**: Pointing fingers → people stop being honest - **Same issues every retro**: If no progress on recurring issues, escalate to leadership ## Quick Reference **Resources:** - **Quick retro formats**: [resources/template.md](resources/template.md) - **Facilitation techniques**: [resources/methodology.md](resources/methodology.md) - **Quality rubric**: `resources/evaluators/rubric_reviews_retros_reflection.json` **5-Stage Process**: Set Stage → Gather Data → Generate Insights → Decide Actions → Close **Top Formats**: - **Start/Stop/Continue**: General purpose, 30 min - **Mad/Sad/Glad**: Emotion processing, 45 min - **4Ls**: Deep reflection, 60 min - **Sailboat**: Visual/strategic, 60 min **Action Quality**: SMART criteria + <5 total + >80% completion rate **Psychological Safety**: Prime Directive + Blameless + Confidential
Related in General
modeling-omnistudio-epc-catalog
IncludedSalesforce Industries CME EPC product-modeling skill for Product2-based catalog creation. Use when creating EPC products, configuring product attributes, building offer bundles with Product Child Items, or reviewing EPC DataPack JSON metadata for product catalog changes. TRIGGER when: user creates or updates Product2 EPC records, AttributeAssignment payloads, AttributeMetadata/AttributeDefaultValues, Offer bundles, or ProductChildItem relationships. DO NOT TRIGGER when: designing OmniScripts/FlexCards/Integration Procedures (use building-omnistudio-omniscript, building-omnistudio-flexcard, or building-omnistudio-integration-procedure), implementing Apex business logic (use generating-apex), or troubleshooting deployment pipelines (use deploying-metadata).
relationship-science-coach
IncludedUse this skill for direct, practical adult relationship coaching: couples conflict, repair, trust, marriage, dating, flirting, attachment patterns, emotional connection, sex, desire differences, eroticism, kink negotiation, affection, love languages, breakups, and long-term passion. Draw on Gottman, EFT and Hold Me Tight, attachment science, modern sex research, Perel, Nagoski, Kerner, Schnarch, Love and Stosny, and flexible love-language tools. Be concrete and low-hedge. Redirect only for imminent danger, abuse, coercive control, minors, non-consent, self-harm, stalking, or medical/legal/psychiatric decisions.
building-sf-integrations
IncludedSalesforce integration architecture and runtime plumbing with 120-point scoring. Use this skill to set up Named Credentials, External Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callout patterns, Platform Events, and Change Data Capture. TRIGGER when: user sets up Named Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callouts, Platform Events, CDC, or touches .namedCredential-meta.xml files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Connected App/OAuth config (use configuring-connected-apps), Apex-only logic (use generating-apex), or data import/export (use handling-sf-data).
venue-templates
IncludedAccess comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.
let-fate-decide
IncludedDraws the 12 Houses of the Zodiac Tarot spread to inject entropy into planning when prompts are vague, ambiguous, or casually delegated. Interprets the spread to guide next steps. Use when the user says 'let fate decide', 'YOLO', 'whatever', 'idk', or other nonchalant phrases, makes Yu-Gi-Oh references, or when you are about to arbitrarily pick between multiple reasonable approaches. Prefer over ask-questions-if-underspecified when the user's tone is casual or playful rather than precision-seeking.
net-ops
IncludedCross-platform network troubleshooting (Windows, macOS, Linux) via local or remote shell. Use for: DNS broken, can't resolve hostnames, nslookup/dig works but apps fail, NRPT, WFP, scutil, /etc/resolver, systemd-resolved, /etc/resolv.conf, NetworkManager, VPN DNS leak residue (ProtonVPN/Mullvad/WireGuard/AnyConnect), AV/firewall blocking DNS or DoH, Tailscale DNS interaction, intermittent connectivity, remote diagnostics over SSH.