rewrite-plan

Included with Lifetime

$97 forever

Author a long-running multi-file rewrite plan that subsequent patch-edit + diff-review + build-test stages will execute, with explicit ownership boundaries and patch-safety guarantees.

Code Review

What this skill does


# Rewrite plan

Spec §20.3 / §21.3.2: scenario 4 (design → deliverable production
code) requires a contract-shaped rewrite plan before the agent
starts editing files. The plan is **the audit trail** every
subsequent stage references; without it the patch path slides into
"refactor everything that looks wrong" and the build breaks in
unreviewable ways.

## Inputs

- `code/index.json` from `code-import`.
- `token-map/*.json` from `token-map`.
- The active design system DESIGN.md (already in prompt).
- The user's tune intent (typically a short brief).

## Output

```text
project-cwd/
└── plan/
    ├── plan.md           # human-readable narrative
    ├── ownership.json    # { file: '...', layer: 'leaf' | 'shared' | 'route' | 'shell' }
    ├── steps.json        # ordered { id, files[], rationale, risk: 'low' | 'medium' | 'high' }[]
    └── meta.json         # { generatedAt, atomDigest, tokenMapDigest }
```

`steps.json` is the input `patch-edit` reads one entry per
iteration. `ownership.json` is the source of truth for "which
files belong to a single component vs. shared infrastructure";
`patch-edit` refuses to touch a `shell`-tier file unless the
matching step has `risk: 'high'` and the user explicitly confirmed.

## Convergence

The atom completes when `plan.md` is non-empty AND `steps.json`
contains at least one step.

## Anti-patterns the prompt fragment forbids

- Plans that include "rewrite the whole component library" as a
  single step. Break into per-component steps.
- Plans that don't classify ownership.
- Plans that don't list a `build-test` step at the end.

## Status

Reserved id, prompt-only fragment in v1. The component-mapping
heuristic + ownership classifier land in spec §16 Phase 7.

Files: 2

Size: 2.8 KB

Complexity: 12/100

Category: Code Review

Source: https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design/tree/main/plugins/_official/atoms/rewrite-plan

Related in Code Review

gstack

Included

Fast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)

Code Reviewscriptsfeatured

startup-due-diligence

Included

Legal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.

Code Reviewscripts

interview-master

Included

This skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.

Code Reviewscripts

fix-issue

Included

Fixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.

Code Reviewscripts

sf-apex

Included

Generates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.

Code Reviewscripts

swift-development

Included

Comprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.

Code Reviewscripts